Old but Slow wrote:Guilty, I guess, and not proud of it. However, I am not saying "don't compete". I would like to see Lock get some playing time, give us more of Mafe, Muse, Rhattigan, Blount, Tareke Young, Curhan, and Adams. Sit some older players like Irvin, Woods, Diggs, Jackson, and Ford. Or at least rotate them out more.
Use this time constructively to discover what the depth is up to. Then tell them to play their asses off, and if they happen to win one, that's alright, too.
Old but Slow wrote:Guilty, I guess, and not proud of it. However, I am not saying "don't compete". I would like to see Lock get some playing time, give us more of Mafe, Muse, Rhattigan, Blount, Tareke Young, Curhan, and Adams. Sit some older players like Irvin, Woods, Diggs, Jackson, and Ford. Or at least rotate them out more.
Use this time constructively to discover what the depth is up to. Then tell them to play their asses off, and if they happen to win one, that's alright, too.
RiverDog wrote:I have to differ. We do all of what you're saying AFTER we are mathematically eliminated. There's always the chance that we could catch lightning in a bottle.
Old but Slow wrote:As I am a bit of a draftnik, I may value a spot or two in the draft order more than most do. It appears that there is a talent drop-off in the early teens, which is where our native pick is or can be. That is why I see value in not winning at this point. If I felt that the team was capable of "lightning in a bottle" I might have a different view, but I do not think that the talent is there yet.
That said, when the whistle blows, I will be pulling hard for a Seahawk win. So I'm crazy, confused, addlepated, and over the hill, but I can still want them to win and still want them to lose. Or something.
I happen to be O K with delayed gratification if it will make us better in seasons to come. This just is not our year.
Old but Slow wrote:As I am a bit of a draftnik, I may value a spot or two in the draft order more than most do. It appears that there is a talent drop-off in the early teens, which is where our native pick is or can be. That is why I see value in not winning at this point. If I felt that the team was capable of "lightning in a bottle" I might have a different view, but I do not think that the talent is there yet.
That said, when the whistle blows, I will be pulling hard for a Seahawk win. So I'm crazy, confused, addlepated, and over the hill, but I can still want them to win and still want them to lose. Or something.
I happen to be O K with delayed gratification if it will make us better in seasons to come. This just is not our year.
RiverDog wrote:I have to differ. We do all of what you're saying AFTER we are mathematically eliminated. There's always the chance that we could catch lightning in a bottle.
RiverDog wrote:I have to differ. We do all of what you're saying AFTER we are mathematically eliminated. There's always the chance that we could catch lightning in a bottle.
Aseahawkfan wrote:No bottled lightning is happening. But we're probably going to win the last two games and might make the playoffs.
Aseahawkfan wrote:Looks like Green Bay is back in the mix too.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 44 guests