Hawktawk wrote:I think this is a real gut check for Geno . A fork in the road . He doesn’t have to win but he has to play well to keep the feel good story going . Last week was the first real downer against a shell of this defense .
I pull for him for his sake as well as ours but there is real money on the line now .
RiverDog wrote:Another stupid arse personal foul on Metcalf for taunting. When will it stop?
RiverDog wrote:Another stupid arse personal foul on Metcalf for taunting. When will it stop?
Hawktawk wrote:Sure but the no call on Geno getting slammed 4 yards out of bonds was ridiculous . You may be right about DK never growing up
RiverDog wrote:Well, Terry McCaulay thought it was a good call because contact was made in the field of play, but I agree that it could have been called. But it wasn't an egregious oversight.
Not only will Metcalf never grow up, but Pete will not even attempt to intervene.
Aseahawkfan wrote:Another five years, hawktawk will be blaming everything on DK and he was the downfall of the team and the usual.
trents wrote:This game played out exactly as I expected. Not a lot of offense from either team.
Our defense played better than I expected but made some critical mistakes that, had they not been made, could have turned the outcome. Diggs drop of a ball that should have been an easy interception. Brooks' blown coverage on Kittle's touchdown. Homer's funble. Mistakes will be made but in a game like that, they just seem to carry more weight. To some extent, we beat ourselves. It was a game we might have won if we had played a cleaner game. I will say the defense tackled better tonight than they have in several games, however. Maybe that was because they felt they could focus on the run with Purdy at QB.
The next game with KC will not be nearly this close.
trents wrote:This game played out exactly as I expected. Not a lot of offense from either team.
Our defense played better than I expected but made some critical mistakes that, had they not been made, could have turned the outcome. Diggs drop of a ball that should have been an easy interception. Brooks' blown coverage on Kittle's touchdown. Homer's funble. Mistakes will be made but in a game like that, they just seem to carry more weight. To some extent, we beat ourselves. It was a game we might have won if we had played a cleaner game. I will say the defense tackled better tonight than they have in several games, however. Maybe that was because they felt they could focus on the run with Purdy at QB.
The next game with KC will not be nearly this close.
Aseahawkfan wrote: And a good interior O-line guy at center or guard.
NorthHawk wrote:Last night just showcased the talent disparity between SF and Seattle.
We just don't have the talent to consistently compete with the better teams. Some of us have been saying that for years and others have just pointed to the win loss record as evidence it's not true but seeing what we
saw last night and previously against the Rams in the playoffs, I don't think anyone can look at this team and think we are anywhere near being a contender.
Geno did OK. He threw some real good passes but also threw some real questionable balls. I think I counted 3 passes that should have been intercepted but weren't. At some point that is going to turn around those INT's
are going to be caught. I hope we don't sign him to a long contract and move on from selecting one of the better QBs in the draft in the mistaken belief that Geno is the answer for the next 5 years. It'll bite us in the butt
if we do, I'm pretty sure. Having said that, this loss wasn't Geno's fault. We were again embarrassed along the LoS and were dominated all game long. That's the reason we lost, plain and simple and it's been a problem for
the last 5 or more years.
NorthHawk wrote:A big Vita Vea type is needed in the middle for a 3-4 to properly work if I understand it properly.
There is a player in the draft that could fit that profile in Siaki Ika, a DT from Baylor. 6’5 and about 360 lbs who can also move well. He’s constantly double teamed but still gets some pressure up the middle. Basically he’s a giant fireplug who can move.
I’m not sure where he’ll eventually be drafted but many big boards and mock drafts have him as an early 2nd to early 3rd pick.
obiken wrote:Or the big dude from GA. However, we have to use the Denver pick for a Qb long term. Geno is capable but not special, we have to cover ourselves IF this was an outlier year.
NorthHawk wrote:I get the feeling that Geno's good play is a limited event. Meaning he's going to crash back to earth as soon as maybe next year.
I wouldn't sign him to more than a 3 year contract with $50M Guaranteed but I think his offers will be less than that in FA.
If we bypass a top QB this year we will never get another chance as we have the people on board to be good enough to keep us from the top 10 but not good enough to make any noise in the playoffs.
Levis is the most pro ready at the moment and may be the first QB off the board, but as ObS said there are others that are good but they might take a year or two to catch up.
QBs are team changers. They can be either good or bad, but the real good ones are rarely found outside the top ten. Occasionally there is Brady or Wilson or Brees, but that's quite rare so it's hard to bypass a player that
could be the leader we need for the next decade in favor of short term expediency.
But we don't know where Denver's pick will end up. I think they could win 2 of their last 3 games giving them 5 wins which might put that pick in the 6 or 7 range. The options then become interesting as we could trade right
out of that spot altogether for a 1st next year plus a couple more this year or if no trade partner is interested take someone that might be expected to go in the later part of the 1st round. A lot is riding on the private workouts
and the Combine results and it's going to be interesting come draft day for us.
c_hawkbob wrote:Whether Geno's play current level of is sustainable or not I don't think we pass on a franchise QB if the right one is available. Will may not be the next Josh Allen or Carson Wentz as McShay says GM's are comparing him to but then again ... he might just be. That's a roll of the dice you take if you have the chance isn't it?
c_hawkbob wrote:Whether Geno's play current level of is sustainable or not I don't think we pass on a franchise QB if the right one is available. Will may not be the next Josh Allen or Carson Wentz as McShay says GM's are comparing him to but then again ... he might just be. That's a roll of the dice you take if you have the chance isn't it?
Aseahawkfan wrote:I don't know if you take your shot with a top 5 pick. In the past ten years or so the number of top 5 pick QBs that have done well is almost pretty small. I wouldn't mind a QB pick with a later draft pick, but a top 5 pick on a QB is one of the most risky, least rewarding picks in the draft.
In the past ten years, I think only Andrew Luck of Top 5 QB has worked out well and even he eventually retired with no ring.
Patrick Mahomes was picked 10th.
Josh Allen was picked 7th.
It seems if you draft a QB later on than the top 5, then there is no pressure and you can take time to develop him.
Let's look. Of the Top 5 QBs picked, who do you consider great?
2022: No one picked high.
2021: Trevor Lawrence number one overall, Zach Wilson number 2, Trey Lance 3
2020: Joe Burow number one overall, Tua number 5, Justin Herbert 6
2019: Daniel Jones number 6, Kyler Murray 1st overall,
2018: Sam Darnold 3rd overall, Josh Allen 7th overall, Baker Mayfield 1st overall, Josh Rosen 10th
2017: Mitchell Trubisky 2nd overall, Patrick Mahomes 10th, Desaun Watson 12th
2016: Jared Goff 1st overall, Carson Wentz 2nd overall,
2015: Jameis Winston 1st overall, Marcus Mariota 2nd overall
2014: Blake Bortles 3rd overall.
The book is out on quite a few of these guys. Some are big hits like Allen and Mahomes. It's a real crapshoot picking a high first round QB. 2020 is looking pretty good, but it will depend on how long they all last.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 47 guests