NorthHawk wrote:The writer makes a good point that PC/JS might never get another shot at a top QB prospect, so that might be something
they are thinking. I’m sure they are considering it even if they eventually go in another direction.
Levi’s from Kentucky has a lightning release like Dan Marino had and the size and attitude of Josh Allen. He’s been under a lotof pressure this year which you can’t say for the other top rated QBs.
From what I’ve seen from the DL, they all seem to be inconsistent and disappear at times, unlike players in previous years.
But at times they are dominant and take over a series.
Aseahawkfan wrote:Find us a great D-line beast.
Old but Slow wrote:Actually, Staten has Jalen Carter DT as the #1 pick, and not likely to fall to 3d pick. True, not as dominant as some, but very disruptive.
If we pick 3d, we would be able to get Carter, Levis, or Richardson. Any of those would make me happy. My first choice is for a QB. It is the most important position on the team, picking in the top 5 is rare, and we have a situation in which a new guy would not need to play too soon.
Will Levis has declared as eligible and is skipping Kentucky's bowl game, so we won't get a chance to watch him. He's been pretty inconsistent, and his team is just 7-5 with him as a starter this season
Old but Slow wrote:Actually, Staten has Jalen Carter DT as the #1 pick, and not likely to fall to 3d pick. True, not as dominant as some, but very disruptive.
If we pick 3d, we would be able to get Carter, Levis, or Richardson. Any of those would make me happy. My first choice is for a QB. It is the most important position on the team, picking in the top 5 is rare, and we have a situation in which a new guy would not need to play too soon.
RiverDog wrote:Will Levis has declared as eligible and is skipping Kentucky's bowl game, so we won't get a chance to watch him. He's been pretty inconsistent, and his team is just 7-5 with him as a starter this season. That's not necessarily a deal breaker as there's been other QB's that have succeeded despite their lack of a good college W/L record, just that he's not a slam dunk first overall. He's back from C-Bob's neck of the woods, so maybe we can prod him into giving us his take.
I'm not adverse to trading down if the price is right. I don't think we could expect the type of deal Miami got out of the Niners, but if we could get a get two first rounders for the price of one, I'd take it.
“He’s 10 out of 10 in toughness,” UK offensive coordinator Rich Scangarello said after UK’s Governor’s Cup rivalry win over Louisville. “I don’t think people realize how injured he was this year. He played for five or six weeks where literally he would sprint out in practice and fall down. Like, his toe would give out on him. Bad habits can come from that with not transitioning your weight and your shoulder.”
https://www.kentucky.com/sports/college ... rylink=cpy
Quarterback has been the downfall of Matt Rhule’s tenure as they tried reclamation projects on Sam Darnold and Baker Mayfield. The team isn’t bad but you have to have a quarterback to win in this league. CJ Stroud, Bryce Young and Will Levis will all be in consideration. My first mock had Stroud going first, but the more I watch Levis the more I think he’s the first quarterback taken. Not only does he have the size and arm talent, but he’s played in the Shanahan/McVay offense the last two years. You cannot look past that.
RiverDog wrote:Thanks for the insider stuff on Levis, Cbob!
If UK was in a major bowl game or playoff that Levis was skipping, then I'd be highly critical of him as I feel that those guys owe something to their schools. But the Music City bowl? That's CFB's equivalent of CBK's NIT.
RiverDog wrote:Thanks for the insider stuff on Levis, Cbob!
If UK was in a major bowl game or playoff that Levis was skipping, then I'd be highly critical of him as I feel that those guys owe something to their schools. But the Music City bowl? That's CFB's equivalent of CBK's NIT.
Hawktawk wrote:I’m not too impressed with 19-10 TDs to picks . Something like low 60s completing ?
Skipping his bowl and abandoning his teammates is my cherry on top . No thanks . Subject to Pete and John of course . I trust their decision . I just think these money grubbing walking franchises are ruining the college game .
Aseahawkfan wrote:Screw that if Levis is already beat up in college. If you can't handle the college beating, it only gets worse in the NFL. It doesn't get easier.
I'd rather take someone with a good health profile so they can at least come in with some chance of taking the NFL beating.
RiverDog wrote:I'm not sure how relevant his injury history is. We have to note that he's been playing through the injuries, so that has to count for something.
They've been using analytics for a lot of different things, and I'm wondering if they have some kind of algorithm that they can use to predict a player's injury risk based on their experience in college.
NorthHawk wrote:I don't think Levis is injury prone, rather he played behind an OL that was suspect in pass protection. He also plays the game a little like Josh Allen and he runs the ball.
He should scale that back in the NFL if he wants a long career but he's a physical player with great physical tools. The Seahawks OL isn't as bad as his OL in college from
a relative point of view, so he wouldn't get hit as much in the NFL. As well the Refs don't protect the QBs as much in college as they do in the NFL.
RiverDog wrote:I'm not sure how relevant his injury history is. We have to note that he's been playing through the injuries, so that has to count for something.
They've been using analytics for a lot of different things, and I'm wondering if they have some kind of algorithm that they can use to predict a player's injury risk based on their experience in college.
Hawktawk wrote:Penny wasn’t ever seriously hurt till his 2nd year in the pros . Science is no help . It’s luck .
Second point is Levis or any of the boy wonders isn’t coming in the league and producing like Geno right away so you’re taking a step backwards to put your chips in the “ franchise qb “ sweepstakes “. Rivers article admits as much .
If we can win now and we know it why go backwards on the crapshoot of maybe hitting a first round qb and maybe not
obiken wrote:We need an Edge guy with the high pick and a project QB with upside for our second. Bennett out of GA or the kid outta Fl would be 2 that come to mind.
Old but Slow wrote:Attempting to evaluate QBs at the college level is chancy. Levis, playing behind a poor line and with no good receivers, is injury prone because he gets beat up a lot? And, we are to compare them even though they have an uneven playing field. For example, much is made. of C J Stroud at Ohio State and Bryce Young of Bama, but both come from big strong programs with plenty of talent all over the place. Stroud is playing behind 3 offensive linemen who are listed in PFFs top 100 for this draft, and Young, playing with an always loaded Alabama has been injured anyway.
It is about tools. Physical tools, such as arm strength, accuracy, maneuverability, and so on, as well as mental acuity to run a pro offense. Some college systems take away the decision making from the QB, while others use a more pro system where the QB can make audible calls and read the defense. It is the mental game that determines when a player is ready to start, so a player that comes from a pro oriented system is likely to start earlier. In a way that reflects the difference between Levis and Richardson, both with great physical tools, but Levis has played more in a pro style, while Richardson has less experience and a more traditional college system.
There are several good arms in this draft but I only see 2 that warrant a top 5 pick, Levis and Richardson. Just my take.
Old but Slow wrote:
There are several good arms in this draft but I only see 2 that warrant a top 5 pick, Levis and Richardson. Just my take.
Aseahawkfan wrote:The number of top draft pick QBs that have flamed out including the coveted number ones is a long list. I fear to take a QB with a high pick because you are pot committed at that point. I don't want to get caught up in taking a guy who gets hyped up but he's not that great or isn't well-suited to what we do.
govandals wrote:I'm all in on Levis or Richardson. With PCJS in charge, we may never have a top five(ish) pick again, so you've got to take the shot. I think Richardson will have a Kyler Murray type late rise in the pre-draft process. His combine and pro-day will be important. His upside is so high I wound not be surprised if he goes #1. To me, his floor is top ten barring any injury or character red flags.
I'm bracing for our first pick to be in the 5-8 range. I think RW squeezes out a few more wins. I really hope I'm wrong. Denver cannot be this bad, can they?
I want to like CJ Stroud but I just can't. His system, scheme and quality players all around him make it easy for him to thrive. Same for Penix if he was coming out. I would not hate it if we drafted Stroud, I just think he sits for a year.
I'm out on Bryce Young unless he shows up at the combine at 200lbs. His frame is just too small. My gut says PCJS aren't doing short QB's anymore, especially, given how Geno sees the field nowadays. It's refreshing.
govandals wrote:I'm all in on Levis or Richardson. With PCJS in charge, we may never have a top five(ish) pick again, so you've got to take the shot. I think Richardson will have a Kyler Murray type late rise in the pre-draft process. His combine and pro-day will be important. His upside is so high I wound not be surprised if he goes #1. To me, his floor is top ten barring any injury or character red flags.
I'm bracing for our first pick to be in the 5-8 range. I think RW squeezes out a few more wins. I really hope I'm wrong. Denver cannot be this bad, can they?
I want to like CJ Stroud but I just can't. His system, scheme and quality players all around him make it easy for him to thrive. Same for Penix if he was coming out. I would not hate it if we drafted Stroud, I just think he sits for a year.
I'm out on Bryce Young unless he shows up at the combine at 200lbs. His frame is just too small. My gut says PCJS aren't doing short QB's anymore, especially, given how Geno sees the field nowadays. It's refreshing.
Hawktawk wrote:Are you saying if we drafted Levis he would start ? In that case why pay Geno ?
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 68 guests