RiverDog wrote:The Raiders 3 wins came against teams with a combined record of 4-15-1. They are virtually eliminated from playoff contention and rumors have been circulating about the future of their first year head coach. It will be at home in front of the 12's, and we're coming off a bye so we'll have had plenty of time to rest. There will be no time zone change, no crappy field conditions, and the moon phase for this Sunday is a waxing gibbous.
Hawks 31, Raiders 21.
Aseahawkfan wrote:If we lose to Vegas, not even sure what to think.
Old but Slow wrote:I am a little wary of the "waxing gibbous".
Hawktawk wrote:yeah it’s not 6:30 pacific time thank goodness . No jello field , good old field turf . No excuses . But I’ll always stand up for my Seahawks if the playing field isn’t level .
Hawktawk wrote:yeah it’s not 6:30 pacific time thank goodness . No jello field , good old field turf . No excuses . But I’ll always stand up for my Seahawks if the playing field isn’t level .
Hawktawk wrote:I intentionally left it out because of you but you brought it up so Ill respond. Officiating was critical in our loss to Atlanta and much more so vs the Saints, that was so bad I almost turned it off. 2 of our 4 losses. then we had 4 weeks of great officiating, one week the mariners got more penalties than us.
Then last game a crew I trust and said so to my son pre game picks up 2 critical flags including a game winning TD after a pretty even performance up to that point. there was no justification for picking either up based on video. Haven't heard you weigh in on our QB getting smashed on a slide and the guy rips at the ball too, flag picked up. Not a no call. A conference call. Then another on the GWTD. Pick play but away from the point of attack they said.
Its not a rule in the book. The flag was on the ground. We got wrung up several times vs Atlanta on calls like that, one 60 yards from the play. Not a hold, man downfield engaged with nobody.
What are your thoughts? Geno fumbled? Brady got picked. the trick got picked. Geno had better stats and same amount of turnovers. We couldn't stop them first half. They couldn't stop our passing game second half . The field was terrible, terrible game to watch. as the game was tightening up 2 pickups of big calls benefitting a guy who was already handed the game on a silver platter, anything the league could do to help. We can speculate on the reasons but its just a fact.
. But suck it up hawks. RD wants tough hawks from his couch, not excuse makers. Doesn't care about bad calls or sloppy unsafe fields that negate a quicker team on both sides of the ball.
XL. Maybe I can troll the troll into defending it again like I've seen in the past. Its remarkable .
Your an odd fan, blame your team every time, your coach. Strange. Criticize 13 years of mostly excellence, attack someone who was dead right about our QB along with Pete if he dare bring that up but troll opinions on officials.
I'm here to talk football, predict a game . Any reasonable fan knows we have been screwed with game losing calls or non calls in the past, been helped sometimes in the past and that either is an option Sunday.
Its a real thing, officiating .
Old but Slow wrote:While this could be seen as a "trap game", I think it is offset by the loss in Germany. The team will likely be wanting to prove the loss was an aberation , and so will not let down against the Raidahs.
Aseahawkfan wrote:Losing to the Raiders would be an embarrassment at this point and clearly show we're not real contenders. That's how I'll feel.
Losing to the Bucs and Brady who have a great defense is one thing, losing to a woefully sad Raiders team would be lame.
I don't expect to lose. Carroll plans to contend this year, so I expect him to have the team ready.
Aseahawkfan wrote:Hmmm. We really need to draft some D-line next year. This cannot continue into next year.
mykc14 wrote:Yeah our run D is terrible again and we cannot get pressure on a QB all of the sudden. Also what the heck was up with our OL? We couldn't run and I know Crosby is a dude and Lucas was sick but they were getting pressure up the kid at times too. Really bad defensive performance again and that is a huge issue that needs to be fixed. Interior DL help would be nice for sure!
Aseahawkfan wrote:They scored 40 points. They been scoring on us all year save for a few games.
I've been beating this drum for years: we need better talent on the D-line. We need to add to the D-line similar talent to what we added to the O-line.
You should not lose a game at home putting up 34 points. 34 points put up by your offense should be a blowout in Seattle against most teams.
Our D-line has been shredded all year but for a handful of games. People thought it was fixed, but it wasn't. It won't be fixed until we draft better D-line guys and at least one pass rusher who can get consistent pressure.
Hawktawk wrote:Geno wasn’t great . Not the problem not the solution. Out line got ate up probably the worst all year in both run and pass . Asking a sick Lucas to face Max Crosby with no help killed us in crucial 3rd down situations including overtime . As for forum genius / antagonist suggesting we go Russell Wilson and bomb away news flash . When you can’t run and your line can’t block you have no time .besides our air yards is far from the bottom. Geno had a chance for a signature moment and didn’t get it . Like an obviously pist off Carroll said after it was right there and everyone had a hand losing it . That would include him. We’ve taken a premature victory lap . It’s far from a lock now . I guess let’s see . If we lose to Carolina add Pete to the hot seat.
obiken wrote:River, how many times over the years as Hawk Fans, have went into a game thinking that a bad team would be an easy win on the table, and the hunted became the hunter. This was one of those games. I was off, but now it looks like so was HT. It looks like ASHF predicting 8 wins was about right. I am looking down the road and wondering what to do at QB. Geno is a good stop gap but he cannot be the franchise QB 7 years from now. Man, did you see where our RT got pushed right back to GS, I want that guy on our DL!
obiken wrote:River, how many times over the years as Hawk Fans, have went into a game thinking that a bad team would be an easy win on the table, and the hunted became the hunter. This was one of those games. I was off, but now it looks like so was HT. It looks like ASHF predicting 8 wins was about right. I am looking down the road and wondering what to do at QB. Geno is a good stop gap but he cannot be the franchise QB 7 years from now. Man, did you see where our RT got pushed right back to GS, I want that guy on our DL!
NorthHawk wrote:Pete's been talking about improving the Pass rush since before trading for Clowney so that would put it around 2017 or so.
So 5 drafts and only Darrell Taylor added as a pass rusher, and he's not doing as well as we hoped this year. The addition of Nwosu looks promising at times, but he disappears and with nobody else providing push up the middle, he
is often eliminated as a threat. For years we've had problems along the LoS and this is just a continuation of the same old thing.
They need to get the run stop figured out and if they don't we will be hard pressed to be competitive if we even make the playoffs. It had a feeling like we were sliding back into old habits and that's worrying.
obiken wrote:River, how many times over the years as Hawk Fans, have went into a game thinking that a bad team would be an easy win on the table, and the hunted became the hunter. This was one of those games. I was off, but now it looks like so was HT. It looks like ASHF predicting 8 wins was about right. I am looking down the road and wondering what to do at QB. Geno is a good stop gap but he cannot be the franchise QB 7 years from now. Man, did you see where our RT got pushed right back to GS, I want that guy on our DL!
NorthHawk wrote:So you are telling us that Vegas with 2 of their 3 best receivers on IR, the game plan wasn’t to stop the run?
If so, someone needs to step away from the decision making process. That’s a troubling scenario if true.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 45 guests