tarlhawk wrote:Excellent staffing and scouting resources to have prepared our draft once again.
RiverDog wrote:Once again? It's the first decent draft we've had in 7-8 years.
NorthHawk wrote:But like River said we can't afford to go into another draft drought like we did before and expect to contend.
I hope PC/JS learned a big lesson in those 7 or 8 years and will continue like last year even if we can't expect 4 or 5 starters from each draft.
Aseahawkfan wrote:Russ's fall may be unprecedented barring a major injury. His lowest QBR was 54 prior to this year. This year it is 33. Russ's fall is almost supernatural.
We're going to end up with a nice top five pick because of Russell's fall into the abyss.
RiverDog wrote:I don't want to be counting our chickens just yet, but given the Bronco's remaining schedule, it looks damn good for getting at least a top 10 pick, if not top 5.
We'll have to start watching teams below Denver and hoping that they win so as to rank them ahead of the Donkeys, ie Steelers, Browns, Jags, Rams, Saints, and Packers.
obiken wrote:The Broncos lost again today. Russ was up 7-0 missed a guy wide open, I mean Wide open down the middle and went for a fade route in the corner. He missed that and had to settle for a FG. Moral of all that, our Draft pick just got better!
RiverDog wrote:I don't want to be counting our chickens just yet, but given the Bronco's remaining schedule, it looks damn good for getting at least a top 10 pick, if not top 5.
We'll have to start watching teams below Denver and hoping that they win so as to rank them ahead of the Donkeys, ie Steelers, Browns, Jags, Rams, Saints, and Packers.
Aseahawkfan wrote:Houston is going for number one again.
What are the rest?
Cleveland 3-7
Pittsburgh 3-7
Jacksonville 3-7
Houston 1-8
Las Vegas 3-7
Denver 3-7
Chicago 3-8
Carolina 3-8
Los Angeles 3-7
Damn. I guess likely top 10 at best. Too many bad teams this year and a few more teams are on the edge of being worse.
Old but Slow wrote:I would not say we will have top 10 at best, but rather top ten at least. At best, would be maybe 2d, although that is highly unlikely. I would guess between 5 and 8. Still a few games to go, though, so it is all conjecture anyway.
Hawktawk wrote:Don't underestimate the ability of Wilson and Hackett to suck. Hackett may be on the chopping block as early as this morning though but who would want to sign up for that dumpster fire. It would surely be some interim with less pull over Wilson and that's the problem . Hackett confided to insiders over a month ago Russell isn't running the plays as called if he doesn't feel like it. He wanted Wilson to insure the clock continued to run on the final throwaway that allowed the Raiders time to tie the game.
This isn't getting better.
Meanwhile Geno is PFF #4 ranked passer in the league #5 ranked rushing QB in the league, #4 PFF DVOA QB . NUIMBER ONE IN COMPLETION PERCENTAGE AND ALSO NUMBER ONE RATING PFF IN THROWS OVER TWENTY AIR YARDS IN THE NFL.(Thatys for all of the dink and dunk accusation guys from a few months ago![]()
Only other guy with those types of numbers across all those categories is Pat...
10 year argument over who held who back, Pete or Russ is about over.
Aseahawkfan wrote:It's not even close to over. It will go on for years. This whole thing could flip in a year. The Seattle fan base is living proof of how fast an entire group of fans can turn on a player or coach or anyone. Geno goes back to bad play and Russ returns to form, they entire argument will shift overnight. Pete fails in the playoffs and you'll see the cries to get rid of him return. Everything can change in a flash. So you claiming something is over is laughable. There's only one thing that ends anything and that is a Super Bowl.
Seattle fan base has tasted the trophy. Once your fan base has the trophy, anything else becomes a failure. Pete has been getting to the playoffs and failing in them since 2014. If that continues with Geno, be assured the Seattle fan base will turn on Pete and Geno just like they turned on Russ.
You want it to be over because you love shouting about being right and this and that. It ain't over, not in the least. Not until Russ or Pete win a Super Bowl or retire. Only thing that will be over is us getting some nice draft picks from Denver. Whether or not Pete and John turn those into trophies is not over. Or whether Russ gets turned around with a new coach which is going to happen at the end of this year. Hackett is done in Denver. He's dead man walking. Denver to salvage this will likely spend big to bring in a coaching name. They can't afford another no name coach like Hackett coming in and failing.
You're a very impatient person. This whole thing can flip and quick. Both Pete and John and Russ have years to make this argument. Year 1 goes to Pete and John with some nice draft picks. But Russ is signed to four more years and Pete and John hopefully will stick around for a couple. This is what you call an ongoing argument.
I-5 wrote:One, it's over. Seattle won the trade, just based on what we have now in multiple players that you need to build a team that all came from the trade. Even if Wilson did well, the worst would be a tie, but he is spectacularly average to below average now, and his regression is not hugely surprising to me based on how frustrating it was to watch him last year. He was playing the same kind of desperation football for us the past couple years, just with better results. Yesterday was by far Russ' best game of the year, and they still couldn't score enough points. He made some good throws and also made some awful throws to no one.
As for Seattle fans' ire towards Russ, I don't see it flipping because just like A-Rod, it was the way he talked and behaved on his way out as much as anything, and that's not going to change no matter if he turns it around at Denver (he wont'). Geno isn't going to suddenly not be able to play well, since the things he's doing are things he's been honing for years in practice and in the gym. He's not playing out of his mind.
RiverDog wrote:I disagree with the first paragraph, agree with the second.
There is no way we can appraise this trade halfway through the first season. Someone pointed out in another thread that if the Broncos could have scored just 18 points in every game, they'd be 9-1. They have lost just one game by more than one score. Depending on your POV, they aren't that far away. If they come back next season, Russell has a good year and they go deep into the playoffs...
Hawktawk wrote:Meanwhile I think I may have been the only guy calling Geno a starter after 1 quarter vs the Rams .
Hawktawk wrote:Meanwhile I think I may have been the only guy calling Geno a starter after 1 quarter vs the Rams .
Hawktawk wrote:Oh no I don’t but this thread fit . I’m being berated by a guy who has yet to say “ Geno is a starter caliber qb”. A very obviously missing signatory along with lots of others to aseas man up conciliation. He was harder on me than anyone . But facts are facts. You seem quite sensitive about being as wrong as humanly possible about this whole thing . Of all the points I made in the post you latched on to this . Some people are never wrong . At least on the Internet .
Aseahawkfan wrote:I am not with Geno unless he shows he can be a playoff QB because some guy that can put regular season stats while losing in the playoffs might as well be Andy Dalton or Matt Ryan with lots of great regular seasons stats and bupkis in the playoffs.
The main criticism of Russell and Pete since we lost the SB in 2014 was no progress in the playoffs. If Geno is just more of that, he won't have people singing his praises for long. Neither will Pete.
Aseahawkfan wrote:I am not with Geno unless he shows he can be a playoff QB because some guy that can put regular season stats while losing in the playoffs might as well be Andy Dalton or Matt Ryan with lots of great regular seasons stats and bupkis in the playoffs.
The main criticism of Russell and Pete since we lost the SB in 2014 was no progress in the playoffs. If Geno is just more of that, he won't have people singing his praises for long. Neither will Pete.
Aseahawkfan wrote:I am not with Geno unless he shows he can be a playoff QB because some guy that can put regular season stats while losing in the playoffs might as well be Andy Dalton or Matt Ryan with lots of great regular seasons stats and bupkis in the playoffs.
The main criticism of Russell and Pete since we lost the SB in 2014 was no progress in the playoffs. If Geno is just more of that, he won't have people singing his praises for long. Neither will Pete.
RiverDog wrote:
Truth.
No longer is simply making the playoffs a standard of acceptable performance. Especially nowadays where 14 of the 32 teams qualify, that's a low bar to clear. All it does is to reward mediocrity.
[/quote]RiverDog wrote:Truth.
No longer is simply making the playoffs a standard of acceptable performance. Especially nowadays where 14 of the 32 teams qualify, that's a low bar to clear. All it does is to reward mediocrity.
idhawkman wrote:Unfortunately, our entire society is more interested in rewarding effort and not results so don't be too surprised at the rewards even if a collapse happens.
Personally, I see us winning 12 games this year and maybe even 13.
RiverDog wrote:
Do you realize what you're saying? We'd have to run the table to get to 13 wins, and that would include beating both the Chiefs and the Niners, two of the hottest teams in the league. You're a bigger optimist than Hawktawk.
TriCitySam wrote:Anyone who thinks Seattle has been a poor drafting team needs to take a hard look at actual results: Seattle vs other teams drafting in the bottom 1/3. Seattle stacks up well with any of them. When taken as a whole vs low drafting teams, the facts do not support the claim of poor drafting. Period.
NorthHawk wrote: Dickson will probably get an extension offer.
That's 6 players out of 58 that were drafted that played more than the original first contract.
Of those only 3 got 2nd contracts outside of an extra year at a time.
You can't say it's been a good patch of selecting players and it set us up for a big loss of talent.
The players were often there at positions of need but we either traded down past them or didn't select them - it wasn't a matter of drafting in the last part of the draft as many Pro Bowl/ All Pro players are selected in the 2nd or later.
Not every draft is going to be like 2022, but we should expect to improve the talent level. We didn't during this period of time.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 76 guests