At the risk of being thought of as a stat monkey
Hawktawk wrote:It’s bad. But I’ve developed a theory or theories about why this particular one is the most rancid display of ineptitude I’ve ever witnessed , really in the entire league . #1 the new scheme . We had 1 interior linemen who can occupy enough space and be powerful enough to hold up . Al woods . The biggest drop off as a result is linebacker play . Barton and Brooks started last year a couple games and looked good in the 4-3. We held the Tards to 16 in our last game although Russ gave up 14 basically with a blown hot read and then an overthrow for a pick to the 1 for line so the defense got charged with that . We lost games in Nortons defense giving up 13(saints ) 15( commmanders) 17 (packers when hero returned to save us from Geno ). Carrol defenses haven’t been lockdown for years . But they have been clutch in the past , were against Denver this year then the wheels came off . With a lot of the same people we are way worse . I’d argue we’re better at corner .
#2 injuries to safeties . Adams was being expected to be a backstop and game wrecker and counting on him lasting was as foolish as expecting penny to play all year but week one . Ouch . Diggs is not right yet either . Slow and weak .
_#3. Hurrt . What a swindler . I was ready to make him Pete’s successor he sold it so good . Yeah Pete’s defense blah blah blah . Yeah it’s his concept and players but Hurrt is making the calls . He’s panicking and sending people crashing upfield seemingly non stop . I get the lack of a dominant edge . But when Hill is lined up at qb? If I were the coach I’d rush zero . Stay in your lanes and gang tackle . I watched some film on the long TD run and 3 linemen had run themselves out of the play by 2 yards before Hill broke the line of scrimmage . Diggs was the only chance ….
I’d give one more game to Hurrt and if it’s another 200 yard game fire his ass . We have an offense that gives us a chance with even a mediocre defense and an opportunity to far overachieve is being squandered . If it’s like this all year fire Pete too . Some of the in game decisions are baffling anyway . Mite be time . He’s hit on enough of the plan to earn this year but imo he’s coaching for his job .
Stream Hawk wrote:Great summary, River. I have been harping on Pete the last few seasons. In fact, I wanted BOTH he and Russ tossed last year. It is not an outdated scheme, it's a lack of talent combined with lack of in-game adjustments. That can't be the DC; we have gone through three in five years now.
Edit: I do want Pete to finish out the season and do expect an improvement. I like Ryan Neal at Safety; some thought he was better for our defense than Jamal anyways. Hopefully, Taylor and Brooks will harness their talents and improve the linebacking. Boya can emulate Avril. There is hope, it will just take time.
Hawktawk wrote:It’s bad. But I’ve developed a theory or theories about why this particular one is the most rancid display of ineptitude I’ve ever witnessed , really in the entire league . #1 the new scheme . We had 1 interior linemen who can occupy enough space and be powerful enough to hold up . Al woods . The biggest drop off as a result is linebacker play . Barton and Brooks started last year a couple games and looked good in the 4-3. We held the Tards to 16 in our last game although Russ gave up 14 basically with a blown hot read and then an overthrow for a pick to the 1 for line so the defense got charged with that . We lost games in Nortons defense giving up 13(saints ) 15( commmanders) 17 (packers when hero returned to save us from Geno ). Carrol defenses haven’t been lockdown for years . But they have been clutch in the past , were against Denver this year then the wheels came off . With a lot of the same people we are way worse . I’d argue we’re better at corner .
#2 injuries to safeties . Adams was being expected to be a backstop and game wrecker and counting on him lasting was as foolish as expecting penny to play all year but week one . Ouch . Diggs is not right yet either . Slow and weak .
_#3. Hurrt . What a swindler . I was ready to make him Pete’s successor he sold it so good . Yeah Pete’s defense blah blah blah . Yeah it’s his concept and players but Hurrt is making the calls . He’s panicking and sending people crashing upfield seemingly non stop . I get the lack of a dominant edge . But when Hill is lined up at qb? If I were the coach I’d rush zero . Stay in your lanes and gang tackle . I watched some film on the long TD run and 3 linemen had run themselves out of the play by 2 yards before Hill broke the line of scrimmage . Diggs was the only chance ….
I’d give one more game to Hurrt and if it’s another 200 yard game fire his ass . We have an offense that gives us a chance with even a mediocre defense and an opportunity to far overachieve is being squandered . If it’s like this all year fire Pete too . Some of the in game decisions are baffling anyway . Mite be time . He’s hit on enough of the plan to earn this year but imo he’s coaching for his job .
Hawktawk wrote:I meant rush yards obviously . And where did you get it’s all Hurrts fault ? You can’t fire the players . They won’t fire Pete mid season . It’s like changing QBs . Maybe it works . Maybe it doesn’t . Listening to Pete yesterday he’s a polite guy but anger at the performance was in the tone of voice .
Yeah I fire Hurrt . He’s the defensive version of Hackett . Sweating like a drug mule in customs , wide eyed and overmatched by opposing OCs . Same players . Way worse results .
Hawktawk wrote:I’ve read 2 articles today saying we miss Ken Norton . Nobody adressed Nortons good games last year that I pointed out . I forgot 17 in a loss to the Rams . You say the roster is garbage . Fine then . Kenny didn’t draft them . But he’s lapped Hurrt . Hurrt is incompetent , overpromoted . Our defensive players are frustrated . As I say this same group of guys minus Reed and Dunlap held this little midget coming to town to 16 and hit him hard . In the roaster . If he comes to our town and smokes us I’ll be ready for the explanation of almost the same rosters on both teams and way different results . Kinda like our D giving up 13 in a loss to the saints last year and we got 10 with Geno . This year we get 32, should have easily been 40+ and give up 39. You have no leg to stand on .
Aseahawkfan wrote:I've been saying it's the talent for years and will continue to say it is the talent. We don't have the D-line talent to be a good defense. The defensive line affects both the run and pass defense. You cannot dictate defensively without a strong defensive line that first stops the run, then pressures the passer. Until they rebuild the defensive line so that can make teams one dimensional, I don't expect to improve much on defense.
This is on Pete. Pete is a defensive guru. He is the expert. He hires and fires the DCs. He knows defense better than anyone in the organization. He has a hand in picking the players. He's the reason the defense is bad right now.
Geno playing well is just more proof that it was not Russell's fault for the team failing to contend again, but Carroll's inability to rebuild the defense. I'm glad that fans like Hawktawk can no longer hide behind Russ as to why this team is bad. He was blaming Russ this whole time, but it has been Pete not rebuilding the defense making this team bad for years.
Even with Geno playing the best he's played in his career. Geno playing like a Pro Bowler. Geno balling out as well as Geno can ball out. We're still losing because Pete Carroll and John Schneider have let this defense fall into the gutter.
Hawktawk wrote:Talent looked ok Sunday . Amazing what making tackles and playing with discipline can do . Hats off to Clint Hurrt . Quentin Jefferson has already proclaimed the Freak as “ a walking gold jacket “
There’s enough talent on both sides of thr ball to make noise this year . Doesn’t mean they will but it’s not primarily a talent issue Imo .
Hawktawk wrote:Talent looked ok Sunday . Amazing what making tackles and playing with discipline can do . Hats off to Clint Hurrt . Quentin Jefferson has already proclaimed the Freak as “ a walking gold jacket “
There’s enough talent on both sides of thr ball to make noise this year . Doesn’t mean they will but it’s not primarily a talent issue Imo .
Aseahawkfan wrote:Bruce Irvin is about to start or get time. He at least knows how to set an edge, which should help the run defense. From what I understand the Chargers don't have much of a run game. Shouldn't have to worry about getting gouged as much with runs, but we'll see.
I don't care how much someone tries to sell me we don't need more talent, they're full of it. We need to draft better D-line and at least one strong pass rush backer/DE to be elite again. Might have to draft another safety as well with Jamal Adams an injury bust. Our LBs and D-line are weak right now. If we want an elite defense again, some of those draft picks are going to need to be spent on 3-4 OLBs and at least DE and NT to make us strong up front. CB seems to be in a good place.
Hawktawk wrote:Fast forward 3 weeks . #1 scoring defense last month . Leading league in sacks last month . The edge guy from the chargers is a top ten edge guy , our interior D line has made adjustments to basically pick a gap and go instead of having to read and react . This occurred as a result of a meeting between Hurrt and the players where they requested the change . We are also playing more nickel and dime on early downs but it’s a fip of switch to LOB performance . The talent is fine . It’s a top defensive unit . My apologies to the DC. Coaching his ass off .
Hawktawk wrote:I’d give one more game to Hurrt and if it’s another 200 yard game fire his ass .....Yeah I fire Hurrt . He’s the defensive version of Hackett . Sweating like a drug mule in customs , wide eyed and overmatched by opposing OCs . Same players . Way worse results .
Hawktawk wrote:I’d give one more game to Hurrt and if it’s another 200 yard game fire his ass .....Yeah I fire Hurrt . He’s the defensive version of Hackett . Sweating like a drug mule in customs , wide eyed and overmatched by opposing OCs . Same players . Way worse results .
Aseahawkfan wrote:I'm glad the defense is performing better. But I do play good and bad team as that is an important factor in evaluating team needs and talents. No one cares if you're wracking up sacks against Kyler Murry and his depleted O-line when they won't be in the playoffs. We care about how you perform against the slot Eagles or the Chiefs who you will see in the post-season. You can have a crap team that performs well against other weak teams, then run into a quality team and get smoked because your talent level was an illusion based on performance against terrible teams. I'm not interested in that. I want a real elite defense with a brutal front four, not some best of the non-contenders defense or team.
Hawktawk wrote:We are playing lights out in every phase .Vegas had us underdogs in 6 of our 9 games . You’re wrong about our talent . Bring on these supposed juggernauts. We’re one of the hottest teams in the league .,it’s ok to have been wrong about how good we could be. Just be happy . We’re really good.
Hawktawk wrote:We are playing lights out in every phase .Vegas had us underdogs in 6 of our 9 games . You’re wrong about our talent . Bring on these supposed juggernauts. We’re one of the hottest teams in the league .,it’s ok to have been wrong about how good we could be. Just be happy . We’re really good.
Aseahawkfan wrote:We got smoked by the 49ers.
Our best win is the Chargers or Giants. The Chargers are pretty injured. Giants are a one horse pony and we stopped their horse.
You'll see that soon enough when we play the Chiefs. Rams I'm still not sure about. We'll see them soon. They have to beat us to stay in the playoff race. They lose even once to us, they are probably done.
Then once we hit the playoffs, we'll see the Eagles and see what they got. And I guess Minnesota.
There are no juggernauts in the NFC. Never seen a worse NFC than this year. But it won't stay that way. I don't feel like seeing Seattle start thinking they're great, then find out the front seven is still the same problem when other teams rebuild their rosters.
You may not care, but I definitely care.
NorthHawk wrote:Our tackling took a bit of a setback against AZ. It might be a one game issue - I hope so but we are playing beyond expectations as a whole.
Aseahawkfan wrote:Arizona sucks.
I want to see if the Rams step up to beat us because the have to and what we look like against the 49ers in round two. And especially the Chiefs. If we can play the Chiefs though, sky's the limit for the season.
RiverDog wrote:This season, everybody sucks, and nobody sucks. It's weird.
Here we are, heading into Week 10 and there's still no clear favorites. Even the Eagles at 8-0 don't have that juggernaut feel to them.
In the NFC South, every single team is below .500. The AFC East doesn't have a single team below .500.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 37 guests