Aseahawkfan wrote:You banged the drum loudest for O-line for years. They finally drafted two tackles that are starting off ridiculous.
RiverDog wrote:That was the best all around performance against a quality opponent (and no, HT, the Jags last year were NOT a quality opponent) that we've played in several years, perhaps since the Rams regular season game in 2020.
Jumping out to a big lead early was huge. Geno's performance, although not eye popping, was decent. With a few exceptions, like the little pitch to Eskridge that was slightly behind him and the tight window throw that got deflected and intercepted, his effort was good enough to win. The defense was up against a top 10 QB and they created enough pressure to keep him from going off. They did the best job against the run so far this season, although getting out to a 17-0 lead helped take some of that threat away. I'm really liking what I'm seeing out of our rookie corners. And Ken Walker...Wow! What was the name of that running back of ours that got injured?
And HT, your conspiracy theory took a bit of a hit yesterday. Can you imagine how many villains you could have exposed had a Charger gotten away with jerking Geno's face mask?![]()
Plus, there was more good news around the league for us besides our win. The Chiefs beat the Niners and the Jets beat the Donkeys. Those two results did several things for us: The Niners loss gave us sole possession of first place in our division, every Denver loss is a win for us, and the Chiefs winning gave them a 3 game lead over the Broncos, who have now lost their last 4 in a row and makes it more likely that they'll be throwing in the towel on the season and having a fire sale by the trading deadline next week.
There were more upsets around the league. WTF is going on with the GOAT and the Weird Beard? A measly 3 points against a dead-from-the-neck-up Panthers team? 0-6 on third down against the Commanders for the horse de-wormer king? Russell isn't the only so-called elite QB that's struggling.
The NFL world keeps getting turned on its head.
Hawktawk wrote:The game was well officiated like many are . Some arent .
Hawktawk wrote:I agree with most although why do you bring up Jacksonville to eat more crow?
Hawktawk wrote:Ive been 100% correct about the man (Geno).
Hawktawk wrote:As for the pitch to eskridge being some blemish on Genos performance wow you’re grasping at straws . It’s not Dee Jay throwing a pass but what eskridge is doing there instead of Walker is beyond me - didn’t even look like Eskridge expected it I flew into a rage . How come fat guy on couch senses the flow of the game better then OC . If they can’t stop you why get cute and stop yourself . Waldron has been great overall but every now and then it’s like WTF . That was one . Just run thr plays . We gave a good enough offense to do it without smoke and mirrors.
Hawktawk wrote:Nice to see the D clean up Genos mistake with the pick but it demonstrated Geno will throw into any window . Nice defensive play.
Jumping out to a big lead early was huge. Geno's performance, although not eye popping, was decent. With a few exceptions, like the little pitch to Eskridge that was slightly behind him and the tight window throw that got deflected and intercepted, his effort was good enough to win.
Jumping out to a big lead early was huge. Geno's performance, although not eye popping, was decent. With a few exceptions, like the little pitch to Eskridge that was slightly behind him and the tight window throw that got deflected and intercepted, his effort was good enough to win.
NorthHawk wrote:I'm not sure that was Geno's fault. We don't know how the play was designed or practiced.
It could be that Eskridge was overexcited and was slightly out of position or jumped the gun by half a step causing the toss to be behind him.
That's a timing play and I can't remember them using it much if at all in any previous games. Then again, Geno might just have missed. We will never know for sure.
MackStrongIsMyHero wrote:I fully expected a loss this week, so this was quite the welcome surprise. I couldn’t watch the game; didn’t anyone take notice of what was so different on defense? I know the play was better across the board, but why? I expected the chargers to make more plays and yards, even in the run game. I know the pundits said the chargers have no run game, but Eckeler feasted on some weak run defenses, which I would consider the Seahawks to have.
RiverDog wrote:Jumping out to a big lead early was huge. Geno's performance, although not eye popping, was decent. With a few exceptions, like the little pitch to Eskridge that was slightly behind him and the tight window throw that got deflected and intercepted, his effort was good enough to win.
NorthHawk wrote:I'm not sure that was Geno's fault. We don't know how the play was designed or practiced.
It could be that Eskridge was overexcited and was slightly out of position or jumped the gun by half a step causing the toss to be behind him.
That's a timing play and I can't remember them using it much if at all in any previous games. Then again, Geno might just have missed. We will never know for sure.
MackStrongIsMyHero wrote:So was that a scheme change? Our corner play has been noticeable getting better every week, but the front seven has been struggling. Then here they are on the road and they stuff the run then apply pressure. I hope they can keep it up.
I-5 wrote:Early on in the first couple gamers, both corners got penalized a LOT, but as one of the players said, that's how they're going to learn what gets called in the NFL...and now they are starting to get comfortable with the game at this level. Bryant doesn't get the spotlight, but he's showing his competitiveness, and both corners (including Jackson) have a nose for being around the ball.
MackStrongIsMyHero wrote:So was that a scheme change? Our corner play has been noticeable getting better every week, but the front seven has been struggling. Then here they are on the road and they stuff the run then apply pressure. I hope they can keep it up.
Aseahawkfan wrote:We'll see how this goes the rest of the year, but the Chargers are a good, not great team. They are the type of team to lay an egg against a team like Jacksonville losing 38-10, then beat someone else the shouldn't. So they are up and down. So this game is a hard to read game as to what it means in the morass of competition.
Now I want to see if the Giants are for real. 6 and1 Giants? I'm thinking smoke and mirrors and we can maybe shatter the mirror with the defense improving.
Old but Slow wrote:The most valuable player in the Chargers game was Neal. He was in a bunch of plays, got his young backfield into the right positions, and was a leader. He was exactly what the team needed. Without Jamal Adams, and with Diggs not playing as he has in the past, Neal was needed and he came through.
Old but Slow wrote:The most valuable player in the Chargers game was Neal. He was in a bunch of plays, got his young backfield into the right positions, and was a leader. He was exactly what the team needed. Without Jamal Adams, and with Diggs not playing as he has in the past, Neal was needed and he came through.
Hawktawk wrote:Nailed it right there OBS. KJ said pre season the safety play would determine our defense and we suffered greatly losing Adams and having Diggs not himself . Neal has played balls out. Signing Irvin had to help , it’s why Pete signed him , leadership and experience . It looked like a different defense by a mile last 2 weeks winning big as underdogs , plenty good enough to win some playoff games if the offense keeps clicking . Lots of ifs but the week 7 snapshot is a team that’s going to be a tough out when we’re doing it with a brand new team in many ways . Pleased so far . Not shocked though .
NorthHawk wrote:I agree completely that Adams has a fantastic attitude, is a great locker room guy, and that the team misses his presence. But those kinds of intangibles can only carry a player so far. With the exception of his first few games when our pass rush was so horrid and our defense was failing at a historic rate, he thrived in that vacuum. A good defense does not require a safety in order to get consistent pressure on the quarterback. Beyond those first few weeks in his first season, he hasn't done squat except get burned on passing plays and spent time in the hospital ward.
Take away that aspect of the game and it takes away Adams' fig leaf and exposes him as an ordinary to below average safety. Hopefully, Pete and John realize that and move away from him next season.
Great safety play makes a defense sound , almost more against the run then the pass. I agree with OBS having Neal step it up has helped the entire defense. The name Bob Sanders comes to mind. Safeties are the mop up crew, the backstop. I just dont agree the guy is below average. His pass coverage was improving and he had 2 picks when injured last year. Im sure Ill hear he missed a couple vs Denver. Whatever.
The trades been beat to death. Argument over. Adams is a guy the offense has to account for every play hes on the field. Hes just not there unfortunately. Im sure his career is over.
He’s the master of the football off the face mask missed interception. He doesn’t have good ball skills and is too fragile to
play a hybrid LB/Safety. He made a name for himself rushing the passer, but that’s because the teams he’s played for
needed the help.
He’s really not that good of a Safety.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 48 guests