Aseahawkfan wrote:Ain't nobody Lynch, but Lynch.
But Ken Walker looks good. Glad we have him.
Aseahawkfan wrote:Ain't nobody Lynch, but Lynch.
NorthHawk wrote:He’s a different type of runner,
Lynch was far more physical but with subtle moves that avoided big hits for the most part.
RiverDog wrote:What separated Beast from all other running backs was his balance. He had such a wide running style, with his feet further apart than the norm, that it was more difficult to knock him down. You could move him off his path, but you couldn't get him off his feet. Plus he had a motor that just did not quit.
RiverDog wrote:What separated Beast from all other running backs was his balance. He had such a wide running style, with his feet further apart than the norm, that it was more difficult to knock him down. You could move him off his path, but you couldn't get him off his feet. Plus he had a motor that just did not quit.
Aseahawkfan wrote:What separated Lynch was his toughness and brutal mentality. I haven't seen a back run like Lynch since Csonka and runners like that who battered the defense. Most runners try to avoid the defense, but Lynch rammed right into them and drove them back down after down. He's one of the only backs I ever saw who made me think he was wearing the defense down and not the other way around.
Hawktawk wrote:I said his early style reminds a bit of Beast . Not that he’s the next beast . Jesus people .
Hawktawk wrote:Walkers style reminds me somewhat of Beast .
Stream Hawk wrote:Bump. Ken Walker III (eg, K9) has a massive ceiling now. Also dude has a silly/snarky personality. Just look at his updated Twitter profile picture, lol: https://twitter.com/jake_m_garcia/statu ... PmHYRgiXTg
NorthHawk wrote:If the run game is going to be a big part of the Offense then the team needs a bell cow RB.
I’m glad JS/PC finally saw the light and selected one early instead of bottom feeding in an attempt to find a hidden gem.
I-5 wrote:My fantasy is having Penny and Walker back together next year...IMO they would make for the most dangerous tandem in football.
I-5 wrote:My fantasy is having Penny and Walker back together next year...IMO they would make for the most dangerous tandem in football.
Aseahawkfan wrote:I'd love that too. Penny is damn amazing when healthy.
It's damn sad when a guy with that much talent is brittle for reasons beyond his control. To me durability is genetics combined with work with genetics playing the bigger role. Marshawn had freakish durability genetics for the way he ran. Josh Allen also appears to have freakish durability genetics for the way he plays. Most QBs doing what Josh Allen does, even elite guys like Mahomes, would get wrecked.
Penny can somehow make it back in year six and have a few good years, I'd take it.
No one ever wanted Penny to fail. We could all see the dude has elite talent. But for whatever reason he can't take the NFL beating.
The NFL is not nicknamed "Not for Long" for nothing, especially for RBs.
Hawktawk wrote:It gets old. Penny reported in the best shape of his life, didn't miss a play all year despite playing last 2 with a sore shoulder. Started last 6 last year with no issues. Dude got landed on by a pile of people who weigh 250 to 325 lbs. Not a conditioning issue. Some wont let it go. Unlucky as hell? yes. Responsible in any way for this injury due to being out of shape?? hell no. Shouldn't even be brought up but it is.By those who never liked the guy.
I-5 wrote:Yes, Penny had problems with his conditioning in the past, which we all know well about. That's not how he has been the past couple years. Why bring it up now?
Aseahawkfan wrote:RD,
I don't think Penny's conditioning was the main reason. Guy didn't have problems in college. He didn't have problems until he reached the NFL where there are bigger, stronger, faster players he's going against, longer seasons, and more opportunity to get hammered and hurt.
When a guy stays healthy in college, you can't foresee the problems at the NFL level. It comes down to genetics and conditioning at that point with genetics sometimes messing someone up. You can't control your genetics for injury. You might reach a level where you're completely fine, then suddenly you reach that next level and can't handle it. Then you start taking more wear and tear and it's a downhill cycle from there with constant attempts to comeback that take months. Then the more your out, the less prepared your body is for taking a weekly beating. Then the whole circular process feeds on itself.
NorthHawk wrote:Some players add weight on purpose for the NFL in the belief that it will help them survive the beating they expect to take in the NFL.
That extra weight can mean added stress on muscles, joints, and ligaments for some. I don’t know if Penny purposely put on
weight but he did lose some before last year which could suggest it might have been a strategy the year before. This current injury is a
fluke but it follows a sad pattern. In the NFL and Pro sports in general if you’re not available on a regular basis, teams will move on
from you pretty quickly.
I-5 wrote:Yes, Penny had problems with his conditioning in the past, which we all know well about. That's not how he has been the past couple years. Why bring it up now?
The point is that Penny gets injured a lot, and it will be a concern when a decision has to be made as to whether or not to bring him back. He was on a one year 'prove it' contract, and he failed the test. Do we move on from him or do we give him another shot?
The point is that Penny gets injured a lot, and it will be a concern when a decision has to be made as to whether or not to bring him back. He was on a one year 'prove it' contract, and he failed the test. Do we move on from him or do we give him another shot?
I-5 wrote:If it was my decision, assuming they get him for a good price since other teams may be (rightly) trepidatious, I would definitely sign him to another 1 year deal and let him compete in camp. If he has a good camp, that's a win. If he doesn't, then you cut him. No brainer for me.
Old but Slow wrote:The next draft seems to have quite a few attractive running backs, and a lot of depth, so a later pick might be a good idea. The meat of the running back class may be in the 2d to 4th rounds.
Old but Slow wrote:The next draft seems to have quite a few attractive running backs, and a lot of depth, so a later pick might be a good idea. The meat of the running back class may be in the 2d to 4th rounds.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 45 guests