Stream Hawk wrote:So sad. So many problems to blow this one. Biggest question is what the hell is wrong with Robbie Ray? And next question is why would you pitch him there over lights out leftie, Swanson.
Worst loss in my Mariner memory.
trents wrote:"Houston, we don't have a problem". The M's have held their own against just about every team they've played this year except the Astros. The Astros may have the most balanced team in MLB and the last two games testify to that. The Mariners need to quit pitching to Yordan Alvarez and put him on base. He's been a wrecking ball this year to the M's. The Mariners have been fun to watch and are an improving team. Spending such big bucks on Robbie Ray was a mistake that may set them back for several years, however. They gave him bucks after he had one shining year. If you look at his career stats, he's a tad over .500, about what he did for us this year. M's need a couple more bats to be a really good team. Too many quick outs in the current batting order.
RiverDog wrote:They did walk Alvarez, moved a runner into scoring position to do so, and it backfired. IMO the Astros are the best team in MLB, have been for some time. No shame in losing to them.
RiverDog wrote:They did walk Alvarez, moved a runner into scoring position to do so, and it backfired. IMO the Astros are the best team in MLB, have been for some time. No shame in losing to them.
trents wrote:But they didn't walk him when the game was on the line and he hit the go ahead homer. They should walk that guy every time unless the bases are loaded.
RiverDog wrote:
Alvarez hit his home run in the 6th, so it's hard to argue that the game was on the line at that point. Walking him with a runner on first would have put the tying run in scoring position and the lead run on first. We'd be engaging in 20/20 hindsight if we were to argue that Servias should have walked him in that situation.
But I did agree with Servias walking him in the 8th even though it moved a key insurance run into scoring position. We knew then that Alvarez was hot. It wasn't that apparent in the 6th.
RiverDog wrote:
Alvarez hit his home run in the 6th, so it's hard to argue that the game was on the line at that point. Walking him with a runner on first would have put the tying run in scoring position and the lead run on first. We'd be engaging in 20/20 hindsight if we were to argue that Servias should have walked him in that situation.
But I did agree with Servias walking him in the 8th even though it moved a key insurance run into scoring position. We knew then that Alvarez was hot. It wasn't that apparent in the 6th.
mykc14 wrote:From what I read they were trying to pitch around him in the 6th, but he hit a really tough pitch that was 4 inches off of the plate. I was at work, watching on my phone so I couldn't tell how far outside it was, but obviously they learned their lesson. It's to the point that the Mariners can't let him beat them. Put him on base from the 5th inning on unless we are up and nobody is on. The Astro's are very good. Unfortunately it feels like the Mariners offensively are playing their best baseball. This loss was discouraging. We put our best out there and still have come up short... twice. We have a big gap to fill if we want to seriously compete for a World Series. The good news is we have good, young players coming back. Now we have to add a SERIOUS bat to the middle of the line-up. I'm not saying the series is over. Win Game 3, put the pressure on Houston in game 4 then who knows? A series never really starts until the home team loses!!!
RiverDog wrote:
My point is that going into the bottom of the 6th, we didn't know just how hot Alvarez was. Castillo was pitching well up until then and had gotten Alvarez out in his two previous trips, so there was every reason to believe that he could get him out again in the 6th. To argue otherwise would be to engage in 20/20 hindsight.
trents wrote:Are you kidding? Alvarez has been hot all year. He is one of the top three hitters in the league and everyone knows it.
trents wrote:Are you kidding? Alvarez has been hot all year. He is one of the top three hitters in the league and everyone knows it.
mykc14 wrote:No doubt- I'd say he's the second best hitter after Judge, but I don't hate Castillo pitching to him in the sixth- especially if he is trying to pitch around him.
Aseahawkfan wrote:Getting and winning in the playoffs is a learning experience. Houston been at it for years. Mariners have to catch up with them. Gives them something to work towards.
trents wrote:Agreed. Astros are a very talented and a very confident, experienced team. They seem to always do the right things throughout every game and by the time you come to the end of the game in which the other team had been ahead, the Astros just seem to catch up and pass them every time. They have no weaknesses is the thing.
trents wrote:The MLB game has changed so much from when I was growing up. It seems like most MLB teams have pretty good starting pitching at least and it's very difficult to string hits together so as to push runners across the plate. Teams have become more and more dependent on homeruns in order to score and almost all batters are sacrificing average on the altar of "big taters" as Dizzy Dean use to call the long ball. Very few teams have more than one .300 hitter in their lineup. Most teams have starting lineups that are populated by a lot of hitters with sub .230 batting averages. This is the result of pitching velocities that keep going up over time, making it harder and harder to barrel up he ball consistently and string together hits. But this extra pitching velocity plays into the current emphasis on the long ball. What comes in hard will go out hard if you can barrel it up with a good launch angle. Physics.
What I'm saying is pitching is dominating the game and I believe some changes need to be made to give something back to the hitters. Move the pitcher's mound back 12" inches or something like that.
c_hawkbob wrote:Only game I've watched in over a decade. Now I remember why.
mykc14 wrote:Obviously the pitching for both teams was great, but I think the 1-0 score over 18 innings speaks to how hard it is to hit at T-Mobile in a day game, especially this late in the year. There has been talk of closing the roof in a day game like this, but that clearly defeats the purpose. Personally, I don't mind it because it's the same for both teams, but if you have 2 teams with good pitching it certainly can make for a boring game.
RiverDog wrote:
It was a warm, relatively dry day in Seattle, so it should have been ideal for hitters as any golfer will tell you that the ball travels further when it's warm and the RH is relatively low. It's on those cool, damp days that closing the roof might help the hitters. Closing the roof on a sunny day might actually have an adverse effect on hitters as it would cool off the air, raise the rh, and cause the ball not to travel as far.
RiverDog wrote:
It was a warm, relatively dry day in Seattle, so it should have been ideal for hitters as any golfer will tell you that the ball travels further when it's warm and the RH is relatively low. It's on those cool, damp days that closing the roof might help the hitters. Closing the roof on a sunny day might actually have an adverse effect on hitters as it would cool off the air, raise the rh, and cause the ball not to travel as far.
mykc14 wrote:The issue I'm speaking to isn't the flight of the ball due to the air, but rather the shadows. It's been an issue since the stadium was built, and actually they started with trying to mess with the background of the behind the pitchers in center field the "batter's eye." They finally settled on Black a number of years ago. What they haven't been able to fix is the issues with the shadows. Jerry Dipoto was asked about the issue earlier this year and said they are aware of the issue but there's not much they can do about it. He was further asked if it was so bad that they would consider closing the roof at times when the shadows were their worst and he basically said there is no way that is going to happen.
RiverDog wrote:
Yeah, I remember the batter's eye thing. They tried growing some trees out there one season then settled on some high tech honeycomb structure that cost more than my house at the time they put it in. However, for the playoff game on Saturday, the pitchers were completely in the shadows being that it's so late in the fall and the sun is so low on the horizon, so I don't think it was an issue for the hitters, or at least I never heard any of them complaining.
RiverDog wrote:Yeah, I remember the batter's eye thing. They tried growing some trees out there one season then settled on some high tech honeycomb structure that cost more than my house at the time they put it in. However, for the playoff game on Saturday, the pitchers were completely in the shadows being that it's so late in the fall and the sun is so low on the horizon, so I don't think it was an issue for the hitters, or at least I never heard any of them complaining.
mykc14 wrote:I know it's something Jerry Dipoto has talked about and the interview I'm referring to was late September sometime so it was still an issue late in the season. During the game the pitchers were still in the sun at least through the 5th inning but that still leaves 13 innings they were not in the sun. The issue wasn't just when the pitchers were in the sun either. Although it was better when both the pitchers and hitters were in the shadow. At any rate it doesn't much matter all I know is it is something that the GM has spoken to, understands it's an issue (at least sometimes, not necessarily during this game), but has said they aren't going to change anything so it's a moot point.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 25 guests