mykc14 wrote:Geno is playing well. He is playing better at this point in the season than I would have thought, although my issue with us signing him had nothing to do with his overall ability to play football. Actually, it was the opposite. I didn't want him to be our QB because he was too good. I saw him as a guy that would lead us to 7-9 wins and a middle of the road draft pick. I saw our roster about two years away from competing for a SB. I wanted Drew Lock to start for us because I thought he would only be able to lead us to 4 or 5 wins. To me this is all about us getting back to the SB. I am still worried we will finish with 7-9 wins, just out of the playoffs. I have been critical of PC over the past three years and my criticism continues now. He has complete control over the roster and is a defensive head coach who has as defense that has been TERRIBLE for years. He decides where the money is spent. He decides which players are on the team. He decides the offensive and defense schemes that we run. There is literally nobody to blame for this defense than PC. With that being said when management decided to not fire PC I wanted to give him at least two years to turn this around. I still feel the same way but I if things don't improve drastically it might be a really good time to move on. Two first round draft picks and two seconds would be enticing for any head coach wanting to come in and take this rebuild on.
Hawktawk wrote:
As far as axing Pete fine. Maybe we get the next Matt Rhule . Or the next Nathaniel Hackett although he’s calling nice plays . Qb can’t hit them. Meanwhile we have an amazing story , an exciting offense , and we’re a couple plays , couple of bs penalties from being 4-1 with disastrous run defense and yards and bad special teams . The book on Pete 22 isn’t written yet and if it’s his swan song he left it in a lot better shape then he found it . For the next hot coach to F it up .
He’s a great coach . I respect him a lot more then I do previous guy .
I-5 wrote:Interesting take. Makes sense from a fan standpoint, but 1) I don't think the coaches want to put anything on the field that they don't think they can win with i.e. no tanking and 2) I think we can get a franchise QB without needing to have a Top 5 pick. Having said that, we should end up with at least 1 if not 2 top 10 picks.
Hawktawk wrote:How about addressing my points about Geno being wanted . And maybe when you admit you were wrong and he’s a competent starter I’ll quit pointing out you were dead wrong about him. Dead wrong about Pete’s evaluation . Dead wrong thinking we should dump Pete and keep the diva . Really really wrong .
Hawktawk wrote:As far as axing Pete fine. Maybe we get the next Matt Rhule . Or the next Nathaniel Hackett although he’s calling nice plays . Qb can’t hit them. Meanwhile we have an amazing story , an exciting offense , and we’re a couple plays , couple of bs penalties from being 4-1 with disastrous run defense and yards and bad special teams . The book on Pete 22 isn’t written yet and if it’s his swan song he left it in a lot better shape then he found it . For the next hot coach to F it up .
He’s a great coach . I respect him a lot more then I do previous guy .
mykc14 wrote:Yes we will never know how good or bad the next hire will be if we get rid of PC, but we do know what PC has been the past few years- a defensive head coach who is coaching one of the worst defenses in the league. I don't know how amazing our story is. Just about every team is "a couple of plays, couple of BS penalties away from being 4-1." That is the difference between being a "good" QB in the league and mediocre. Like I said before, when Geno starts to win those close games I will start admit that he is an above average starter in this league. The reality is we are 2-3 with two wins vs. teams with a combined 3-7 record and have also lost to two bad teams (Saints with an offense full of backups and the Falcons). You complain about our terrible defense and tell us how good Geno's record would be with a good defense yet you continue to make excuses for PC. PC has nobody to blame but himself when it comes to this defense and at some point he should be held accountable. Continue to push all of these hypotheticals on us and bash RW (I created a thread last year stating that there is no way we could win another SB with him at QB) none of it matters. At the end of the day we are a 2-3 team who is probably going to finish with 7-9 wins. Our only saving grace might that the Broncos aren't great and hopefully they keep playing bad. If Geno continues to play at this level he will provide a good placeholder for our next QB and for what it's worth I hope you are right about him. I hope he becomes the man that can win us a SB, I really do. I want us to be able to us a high draft pick on defense because we are so bad, I just don't think he is.
Hawktawk wrote:How about stow it. There’s no justification for being called a scumbag for speaking truths about Russel . Did you catch the tweets from Baldwin and other players after the Seattle game ? . There’s some harsh feelings from people who know him better than me . And the ten year fandom shrinks by the day as it becomes clear who he is , who he became , everywhere but this forum . I was a trailblazer for Seahawks nation and Pete and john got it 100% right .
. I don’t care if he goes to church or donated to charity or whatever . As our qb be sucked in the end and was disrespectful and ungrateful The hell with him . Good riddance.
I’m not whining about out to lunch people hurling insults , Just pointing out how wrong you all were about Geno and that’s what you latch on to . You people don’t debate facts . Oh and he backed up his POW with a PFF offensive player of the week this week . That’s 32 teams . Is he a competent starter yet ?
RiverDog wrote:I will stick up for Hawktawk on one topic. That injury to Penny was not due to conditioning, running style, or any other factor under his or the team's control. It's like Lockett's injury a few years ago. There were other injuries that Penny suffered due to his lack of conditioning, but not this one.
Penny is snake bit. Injuries follow him around, and there is no explaining or predicting them, at least not this latest one. When we drafted him, it wasn't necessarily him that I objected to spending a first rounder on, although I did favor Nick Chubb, it's running backs in general. I wasn't thrilled with the Walker selection, either, except that he looks to be a good value relative to other running backs and his body type MAY allow for him to be less susceptible to injuries.
Aseahawkfan wrote:Penny doesn't have NFL durability. I consider NFL durability a real NFL trait. One that can be measured. It can't be foreseen. If a player doesn't have it, it doesn't matter how good he is, he won't make it on field. I do not believe that players who don't prove to have NFL durability suddenly develop it in year 5. Which is why you and I and a ton of other fans were dubious about Penny continuing his run.
NorthHawk wrote:Teams are now figuring out what the Seahawks are doing on Offense and are countering it. Without much of a run game it's even easier to defend.
The pass protection is still pretty good but this is new territory for rookies used to playing only 12 games and proper rest and nutrition can be difficult to follow for young kids.
I'll take a pair of rookie OTs playing at an average level in the NFL any time because they are going to improve with experience.
Geno is a surprise to me but he's been very lucky. I said in another post that he had the most dropped INT's in the league. Now the defenders aren't dropping as many and it's looking a little shaky.
He's still playing at a better than backup level so it's a bonus. The rest of the season will tell how mgmt views the QB position and whether they offer Geno a huge contract or a shorter term one at a lesser value.
It will also determine whether a QB is taken early or not in the draft.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 34 guests