obiken wrote:Sorry this is early, but its time just to man up and say I was wrong and HT was right. The Oline is solved, Penny looks a lot better, and no matter IF we go with Strong or stay with Geno, this is a lot better offensive team than I thought. Our defense is what I thought it was, warmed over mutt food, but with 2 1st, 2nd's and 3 3rds we have a chance to really improve. I would have sworn he was delusional, he is not.
NorthHawk wrote:He's been playing better than I expected between the 20's but last game was against a horrible Defense so scoring 41 shouldn't be a surprise.
We should know a lot more after the next few games, though and we have a tough stretch of teams after the bye week.
NorthHawk wrote:He's good enough on a team that's not going anywhere.
He wouldn't be good enough on a good team trying to make a challenge for a championship.
Even the coach doesn't fully believe in him.
The clock will strike midnight for Geno at some point this season.
Hawktawk wrote:3 other teams got to play Detroit . I really want to focus on the positive but really ? Good between the 20s? This guy sucks !remember ? He’s Hawktawks pipe dream . Can’t even get anyone to admit he plays like a starter .
He is in the top 10 minimum in every statistical analysis including 6th in YARDS PER ATTEMPT so maybe time to stop sounding foolish saying his league best by 5% 77.5 % completion % is because he just dinks and dunks . You’re wrong about Genos skills physically and mentality , his poise , absolute command of the huddle and the team at the los, audibles to both Penny TD runs , one on 3rd and 18. 2 guys I was right on but at this point Geno has exceeded even my expectations .
Like Wyman said “ we do have a track record “ he’s got 7 starts now “ over a 100 passer rating , 11 TD passes , 2 rush TDs , 3 picks including one in relief vs the rams . He’s been over 70% completion in all but 1 of 7 starts .
Everyone knows the one issue is we haven’t won more then lost . I heard Wyman allude to comments Pete had made about Geno . While praising his performance he added words to the effect “ he’s had a chance to be the hero in other games “
And so good for Pete the wishy washy mealy mouth happy talker . The message is clear . Lead the team to wins. If he can’t he’s a more accurate Kirk cousins . At least he’s 3.5 million , not 30.
Geno is far better then any of you thought he could ever be and if he gets us to the postseason he should have won the super bowl or he still sucks .
You people crack me up
GO HAWKS!
RiverDog wrote:[Now you're exaggerating again. No poster in here ever said that Geno sucks. The worst that anyone said about him is that he isn't a starting quality quarterback, that he's an average backup, that we're a 33% win team with him, and so on. And the great between the 20's wasn't some junk that we were throwing around. It was a fact.
We'll see how he does as the season wears on, as defenses start getting some film on him, get familiar with his tendencies, and start game planning against him. That's one of the things that caused Russell's performance to wane. Defenses got wise to him. And keep in mind that we're still just a 2-2 team. Come back and talk to us when we rack up 10 wins like you predicted.
RiverDog wrote:[Now you're exaggerating again. No poster in here ever said that Geno sucks. The worst that anyone said about him is that he isn't a starting quality quarterback, that he's an average backup, that we're a 33% win team with him, and so on. And the great between the 20's wasn't some junk that we were throwing around. It was a fact.
We'll see how he does as the season wears on, as defenses start getting some film on him, get familiar with his tendencies, and start game planning against him. That's one of the things that caused Russell's performance to wane. Defenses got wise to him. And keep in mind that we're still just a 2-2 team. Come back and talk to us when we rack up 10 wins like you predicted.
Aseahawkfan wrote:I said he sucked. I don't like him as my starting QB. I still don't like him as my starting QB. I don't think he can win big games. I think he is running a very short yardage offense very well against very weak teams. I think fans are getting over-hyped on Geno again with a small sample size where he is playing as well as he is and we're still 2 and 2. I think quality teams will clown us with Geno at QB. I don't think he cans step up to beat Mahomes or Herbert or Allen. I believe overtime that will be born out. If Geno starts leading us to beating high quality teams in the fourth quarter in tight games, then I'll change my tune.
Right now he looks like Nick Foles when he had that one anomaly year in 2013. Let's just say I ain't buying it.
And as far as Russell doing badly, good for us. I need Russell to do badly this year. And Denver as a team. I want a nice top five pick from them.
RiverDog wrote:[Now you're exaggerating again. No poster in here ever said that Geno sucks. The worst that anyone said about him is that he isn't a starting quality quarterback, that he's an average backup, that we're a 33% win team with him, and so on. And the great between the 20's wasn't some junk that we were throwing around. It was a fact.
We'll see how he does as the season wears on, as defenses start getting some film on him, get familiar with his tendencies, and start game planning against him. That's one of the things that caused Russell's performance to wane. Defenses got wise to him. And keep in mind that we're still just a 2-2 team. Come back and talk to us when we rack up 10 wins like you predicted.
Aseahawkfan wrote:I said he sucked. I don't like him as my starting QB. I still don't like him as my starting QB. I don't think he can win big games. I think he is running a very short yardage offense very well against very weak teams. I think fans are getting over-hyped on Geno again with a small sample size where he is playing as well as he is and we're still 2 and 2. I think quality teams will clown us with Geno at QB. I don't think he cans step up to beat Mahomes or Herbert or Allen. I believe overtime that will be born out. If Geno starts leading us to beating high quality teams in the fourth quarter in tight games, then I'll change my tune.
Right now he looks like Nick Foles when he had that one anomaly year in 2013.
OK, thanks ASF. Hawktawk, I owe you an apology, at least for what I said in my first paragraph. But I stand by what I said in the 2nd.
Hawktawk wrote:Hey Asea Foles was super bowl MVP over Brady long after 2013. If Geno can have Foles ceiling I’m all over that . Matter of fact he outplayed Wilson with the bears last year despite our defense beating the crap out of him . Foles is Geno and it’s not a bad thing because I believe in Foles . I think quarterbacks get thrown away and written off too soon . And as for the short low risk offense he’s thrown for over 300 yards back to back and has the SIXTH Highest yards per attempt but also the best completion % by 5 points in the league . Rushed for 50 yesterday . What’s the use with you ?
And Rd the thread by obi is giving me props about 3 things . O line, Geno and Penny . So far I’m dead wrong about the defense . My 10 wins is not knowable and as I said to Obi 15-2 and 2-15 are both possible . But I think we can score 30 a game on most and if we clean up the defense at all we can get there . If we don’t I won’t be making excuses and denying reality like some in this snapshot of a quarter season . And if you think Geno is completing almost 80 % and moving on everyone ( 1 3 and out in 2 games ) because teams don’t have film on him ? Lol he’s just beating teams with perfect throws and above average wheels and a way better grasp of the game then I dreamed . We have 7 starts . He’s who he is now . A top ten Qb .
MackStrongIsMyHero wrote:I fully support Geno, but still 13 games left in the season and some tough ones at that. Hard to say he has arrived when career as a starter prior to the Seahawks has him as average at best. Granted, he’s older now, spend a lot of time in QB rooms, so maybe his game has legitimately elevated, but we don’t know that for certain yet.
This weekend should be one of those tough ones. Our defense is bad enough to make NOLA’s offense look good, and their defense is a lot better than the Lions. It’s not all on Geno, but he and the offense look like they are going to have to carry the team. Finger crossed the defense can do just enough.
I-5 wrote:Though I didn't sing his praises as much as HT, I've been a believer in Geno since he took over from Russ last year. I was more than pi$$ed when Russ forced his way back into the disastrous game at Green Bay. Geno had been steadily improving and just had a great all around game vs Jacksonville, which of course everyone discounted. I never once thought Lock deserved to start over him.
Obviously, New Orleans is a lot better than Detroit, and we won't score 48, but I'm confident we'll be able to move the ball and score....it will be up to the D if we have a chance.
Props to HT
RiverDog wrote:Before we break out the anointing oil, I'd like to remind everyone that we have played less than 1/4 of the season. No one is right or wrong at this juncture. And I would also like to remind everyone that Hawktawk's prediction was for a minimum of 10 wins, and at 2-2, we are currently below that pace. A lot is going to have to happen that hasn't in these first 4 games before this team can come anywhere near 10 wins.
Having said that, Geno has been a pleasant surprise to this point of the season. He has shown good accuracy, has protected the ball, and for the most part, shown good decision making. It's everything that is required of Pete Ball. But our running game has been hit or miss...mostly miss until this weekend, as has been our red zone efficiency has sucked, and our defense is on pace to be Pete's worst product ever, college or pros.
So we'll see how it goes. I have no problem tipping my hat to our friend Hawktawk once he's earned it.
I-5 wrote:When is the right time to 'break out the anointing oil'...when we win the SB or Geno is named to the pro bowl? NFC Offensive Player of the Week isn't a bad start.
RiverDog wrote:Before we break out the anointing oil, I'd like to remind everyone that we have played less than 1/4 of the season. No one is right or wrong at this juncture. And I would also like to remind everyone that Hawktawk's prediction was for a minimum of 10 wins, and at 2-2, we are currently below that pace. A lot is going to have to happen that hasn't in these first 4 games before this team can come anywhere near 10 wins.
Having said that, Geno has been a pleasant surprise to this point of the season. He has shown good accuracy, has protected the ball, and for the most part, shown good decision making. It's everything that is required of Pete Ball. But our running game has been hit or miss...mostly miss until this weekend, as has been our red zone efficiency has sucked, and our defense is on pace to be Pete's worst product ever, college or pros.
So we'll see how it goes. I have no problem tipping my hat to our friend Hawktawk once he's earned it.
I-5 wrote:When is the right time to 'break out the anointing oil'...when we win the SB or Geno is named to the pro bowl? NFC Offensive Player of the Week isn't a bad start.
MackStrongIsMyHero wrote:You’ve got these 7 against his previous 40, 30 of which he started. He’s trending the right direction, but I don’t blame anyone for not being convinced yet. Putting in a full season of consistently solid play isn’t too much to ask. I’ll have zero problem tipping my cap to him when he does.
Aseahawkfan wrote:Geno is doing well enough against weak teams. San Francisco absolutely shut us down. In Atlanta Geno couldn't step up and win in the fourth quarter. These are the things that really separate franchise starters from backups or fill ins. You want a guy under center who can go toe to toe with a Frisco and step up in the fourth quarter to beat an Atlanta. This has been why I don't see Geno as the long-term answer.
When I think of a franchise NFL QB, I think of a guy that can go to battle against any team and any other QB in the league. They step up during divisional games. They can win when the game is on the line in tight games. They can destroy weak opponents like Detroit and are always keeping the team competitive against stronger teams. If I see Geno step up against some big teams, then I'll start reassess my opinion. But until then, this is just a backup QB having some good games against garbage defenses.
The Denver win was nice, but as we look back now the Denver offense is bad, real bad. As their defense and run game collapses due to injuries, Denver may start losing a lot. And that's great for us.
Even my buddy today brought up other backup QBs like Jon Kitna or John Friese who made people believe for a while they can do the job, then reality sets in as the season progresses, defenses get film on them and adjust to what you're doing, and the weaknesses show and you find out the guy isn't that great.
The quality of the opponent absolutely matters. You aren't going to be playing a team like Detroit in the playoffs or for a playoff spot. They are a terrible, non-contending team. When you square off against a real contender like San Francisco and get smoked, it let's you know what you're realistic chances of contending are.
The bottom line is Seattle including Geno need to get a whole lot better against quality teams to be a real contender. The defense especially needs to get better, like real fast, or the stronger teams are going to embarrass us.
Some fans may be high or feel satisfied beating weak opponents, but I am a big believer in steel sharpens steel. If you're only good against wooden swords like Detroit, means you might be a wooden sword as well that will break when you go against a steel sword.
Hawktawk wrote:Denver is lucky not to be 0-4.
Stream Hawk wrote:This has aged well. Wow. Sherman absolutely LIT HIM UP tonight. Nice job, HT. Seriously.
Honestly, this might become the best trade in franchise history. That is probably an understatement. Just imagine Pete and John right now. Also Denver is losing their collective minds. Russell really does look extremely overrated, and I doubt he’s going to recovery from this. Sherman was amazing on post game. He absolutely ripped him apart and it was awesome. It did bring back a lot of PTSD for us all I’m sure. That was by far the most intense post game commentary I’ve seen ever probably..
Re Russ. I think it was a system thing. He was PERFECT in the zone read & play action offense- when he was in his early to mid 20s. Dude is washed now. I have no clue how Denver will recover from this. Not our problem. Pretty good feeling as a Hawk fan right now?
RiverDog wrote:
So are we. We won our two games by a grand total of 4 points.
RiverDog wrote:
So are we. We won our two games by a grand total of 4 points.
I-5 wrote:Regardless of record, the Seahawks are in MUCH healthier trajectory and situation in every way. It is depressing being a Denver fan right now. I’m enjoying this season so much more than last year.
I-5 wrote:Regardless of record, the Seahawks are in MUCH healthier trajectory and situation in every way. It is depressing being a Denver fan right now. I’m enjoying this season so much more than last year.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 53 guests