Aseahawkfan wrote:Geno is doing exactly what I said he would do at the start of the season: running a careful, turnover averse offense using short to medium passes hoping the skill players can obtain YAC. He won't win games from behind where he has to elevate his game and win from behind as the game goes on. It's why he's a backup QB on any team with a true starting QB.
Geno is not the answer and exactly what I thought he was going in. He's not fun to watch. He doesn't give us a good chance to win.
NorthHawk wrote:Grasping at straws my friend.
0 points in 6 quarters says it all.
c_hawkbob wrote:Is that QBR or passer rating OBI? They are very different. 77 ain't a bad QBR.
c_hawkbob wrote:Is that QBR or passer rating OBI? They are very different. 77 ain't a bad QBR.
c_hawkbob wrote:Is that QBR or passer rating OBI? They are very different. 77 ain't a bad QBR.
c_hawkbob wrote:Is that QBR or passer rating OBI? They are very different. 77 ain't a bad QBR.
obiken wrote:No that’s QBR rating, 77 QBR is a back up, 87 is a Low end starter, 97 you’re starting to get a few votes for pro bowl. No, if he was a 70% passer he’d be tops in the league. The point I was trying to make is Geno Smith is a good back up and that’s it!
Hawktawk wrote:It is official . Geno smith is the first man in NFL history with 3 straight starts over 80% completion minimum 10 attempts . He’s averaged 25 attempts . No it’s not because he dinks and dunks . You would think we could figure out how to score .
Hawktawk wrote:It is official . Geno smith is the first man in NFL history with 3 straight starts over 80% completion minimum 10 attempts . He’s averaged 25 attempts . No it’s not because he dinks and dunks . You would think we could figure out how to score .
Aseahawkfan wrote:If Geno can't lead the offense to scores against the Falcons, we're in some real trouble. Falcons at home should be as easy a win as we can expect this season. Even your backup should be able to make this happen.
Hawktawk wrote:Ill take my chances with my 80% backup. You write him off after the first game since he came in and went 98 in his quarter vs the rams that he hasn't thrown at least 1 TD pass. Its Atlanta. Its home cooking. He was sacked twice and hit 9 more times and had the ball taken away in maybe the dumbest call since the 1 yard line in Glendale. Run the ball, let him take some shots if there's time.(there hasn't been) Stop the run or at least slow it down. good lord.
I have no Idea what to expect . If we dont beat Atl its probably Drew time if Geno completes 100%
I-5 wrote:Is Geno’s passing the main reason we aren’t scoring, or is it penalties and offensive play calling? What is he being asked to execute that he’s not doing on a play by play basis exactly? I’m sure if they want him to take deeper shots, he’s got the arm to do it. Pete is the one holding it back as far as what I see. He plays scared (Pete that is). I don’t think Geno is afraid to fling it.
I-5 wrote:Is Geno’s passing the main reason we aren’t scoring, or is it penalties and offensive play calling? What is he being asked to execute that he’s not doing on a play by play basis exactly? I’m sure if they want him to take deeper shots, he’s got the arm to do it. Pete is the one holding it back as far as what I see. He plays scared (Pete that is). I don’t think Geno is afraid to fling it.
NorthHawk wrote:It's clear that Pete's Offense requires a QB that can elevate his game. He has to be both conservative and aggressive and not many QBs can do that.
As well, I get the feeling, and it's just that - a feeling, that there is a bit of a hybrid of Pete's Offense and Waldron's McVay style going on. I'm not sure
that the two are compatible. We see some more passes to the RB's in the flat, but very little pre-snap motion. We've had a couple of runs outside the Tackle box
but most are between the tackles. More use of the TE's in the pass game but it doesn't look at this point we are asking Fant to block(good thing).
NorthHawk wrote:In this case it is all hype.
If his average was 10 -15yds per pass, then OK, but short passes to the backs and TE's with no scores to show for it doesn't mean much.
It's yet another demonstration of how statistics can mislead.
NorthHawk wrote:Please. Enough of this Geno apologist stuff.
He's a good Backup QB and that's all we should expect of him. Period.
NorthHawk wrote:Please. Enough of this Geno apologist stuff.
He's a good Backup QB and that's all we should expect of him. Period.
Hawktawk wrote:
You Geno haters and it’s what you are will never admit you’re haters . I’ll celebrate our NFl record setting tough as whale sh1t most accurate passer ever . Stay in the mud if you like . Hopefully you will remember to eat the crow if he’s successful . I will if he isn’t . But you want to argue about an 80% completion rate playing a tough defense , a filthy defense and a defense that held Buffalo to 6 the week after Geno hung 31, 2 TD passes and a rush TD, 138 rating . But bad team right .
It’s laughable how much you guys root for Geno to lose to win an argument .
mykc14 wrote:I don't give two $hits about accuracy if we aren't producing points. You keep posting the same things ad nauseam. Completion percentage, last two games, targets to DK, robbed of a completion, etc... none of it matters. If Geno Smith starts putting up points I will start eating Crow. The reality is that it's not just Geno and his limited ability but it's also PC and his offensive philosophy. If your goal is to play great defense, run the ball, control the clock, and not turn the ball over then you better do those things. Over the last 2 games we haven't played great defense or ran the ball particularly well. A big part of the that is that nobody fears Geno beating them. We are in year one of our rebuild so I will give PC a little grace, but this is his train 100% and if we don't see major improvement next year I will be firmly on the fire PC train.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 55 guests