RiverDog wrote:I haven't had a chance to re-watch the game, but Cross looked like he struggled some against Chubb in the 2nd half. Offensively there was a big difference in general between the first and second halves. But overall, I loved how our OL held up.
I liked Will Dissly. He made some nice catches, including a TD. Parkinson finally made some contributions. Tight end looks to be a strong position group. Geno did a great job of spreading the ball around.
As far as the defense goes, with the exception of our performance in the red zone, it's pretty hard for me to paint a smiley face on 433 yards of total offense. Had it not been for the penalties (12 of them on the Donkeys), two goal line fumbles, and gross incompetence by Denver's coaching staff, we would be having an entirely different conversation.
zackole wrote:My observations...
Rookie tackles did great for first pro game
Liked the defense intensity...need to wrap up runners. Way to many yards given up. Linebackers missing in action to much...
D-backs need to learn systen... a few missed assignments/wide open receivers
Our backs need to run north/south. To much juking around rather than hitting the line. Would like to see Dallas in the mix...he runs straight and tough
Russell... i don;t care...
NorthHawk wrote:I saw Luke Willson talking about the game and he said Pete's one of the best at getting a team up for a game.
I think they played as well as they can on Monday night but they won't have that same emotional level of performance for 17 games.
I think they will get 5-7 wins this year. Teams often start out hot (or cold) the first game but find their true level as the year wears on.
NorthHawk wrote:A squeaked out gift win against an unprepared opponent isn't exactly grounds for huge excitement. There were some good showing by young players, though.
The clock is closer to midnight than you are letting on or perhaps know.
NorthHawk wrote:I saw Luke Willson talking about the game and he said Pete's one of the best at getting a team up for a game.
I think they played as well as they can on Monday night but they won't have that same emotional level of performance for 17 games.
I think they will get 5-7 wins this year. Teams often start out hot (or cold) the first game but find their true level as the year wears on.
trents wrote:Frisco is very beatable. Hawks will be loading up with blitzes and pash rush schemes to rattle Lance who seems not to need much help with that.
Hawktawk wrote:This forum is an amazing collection of negative energy
trents wrote:Frisco is very beatable. Hawks will be loading up with blitzes and pash rush schemes to rattle Lance who seems not to need much help with that.
I-5 wrote:If were playing against Jimmy at QB this Sunday, I'd say we lose. But against Trey Lance, we definitely have a chance. We haven't seen the 'good' Lance yet....and I'm not sure who or what that looks like. I can only imagine at how Niner fans are feeling.
Old but Slow wrote:It was nice to see the offensive line provide Geno a real pocket to pass. Our new center Blythe looked good, which was a position of doubt. Maybe less so now.
While the defense had some problems, we got some quality play from Nwosu (defensive play of the week) and Michael Jackson. Where was Mafe? Al Woods is nearing the end. He can have an impact at times, but he seems to need more rest than in the past. His rush on the second goal line fumble was epic, so I am thinking that he will be good this season, buy it may be his last.
I was hoping to see something special from Darrell Taylor, but he has to learn to contain. Too bad about J Adams, as I was hoping to see some good play under this new coaching scheme.
RiverDog wrote:Yeah, Lance hasn't shown squat. That's one of the reasons why I'm picking them to win. He's due. Odds alone suggest that he's going to have at least a decent game. And with the Niners' defense and running game, they don't need him to win games with his arm.
Every game is winnable, especially this time of the year when we haven't gotten a good look at all the teams. I'd hate to bet on this one.
I-5 wrote:When you say 'he's due', do you mean he'll turn into a competent or at least serviceable QB? His throwing issues aren't going to change from Week 1 to Week 2.
I-5 wrote:When you say 'he's due', do you mean he'll turn into a competent or at least serviceable QB? His throwing issues aren't going to change from Week 1 to Week 2.
Aseahawkfan wrote:My buddy said passing during the weather conditions in Chicago impossible. He's a hardcore Seattle fan who thinks we will beat Frisco. But even he told me not to judge Trey off that Chicago game. He said they were playing in a torrential downpour and the field was a slip and slide. So I guess we'll see.
MackStrongIsMyHero wrote:I don’t understand the notion Denver was unprepared. They had the same amount of time that Seattle had to be prepared. That they didn’t execute and has coaching miscues doesn’t diminish the win. These guys are pros too with all the modern resources of pro football at their disposal.
Didn’t like all the bend I saw in the defense but they came up big when it mattered. Woolen definitely got grabby but the one that saved the touchdown was worth it. The ensuing fumble recovery wouldn’t have happened.
Most maddening to me was the dump offs behind the blitz that Denver went to with regularity. Seattle better find an answer to this tactic, or they’ll have trouble getting the defense off the field.
Otherwise, happy with pretty much everything else others have stated. Lot of potential on this team. Look out if they land the legit QB prospect next draft.
MackStrongIsMyHero wrote:I don’t understand the notion Denver was unprepared. They had the same amount of time that Seattle had to be prepared. That they didn’t execute and has coaching miscues doesn’t diminish the win. These guys are pros too with all the modern resources of pro football at their disposal.
Didn’t like all the bend I saw in the defense but they came up big when it mattered. Woolen definitely got grabby but the one that saved the touchdown was worth it. The ensuing fumble recovery wouldn’t have happened.
Most maddening to me was the dump offs behind the blitz that Denver went to with regularity. Seattle better find an answer to this tactic, or they’ll have trouble getting the defense off the field.
Otherwise, happy with pretty much everything else others have stated. Lot of potential on this team. Look out if they land the legit QB prospect next draft.
Aseahawkfan wrote:When they say unprepared, they are going by no preseason play for the starters and a rookie coaching staff preparing for his first game as head coach and looking lost with all the penalties and problems with clock management and play calling.
MackStrongIsMyHero wrote:Well, they had every chance to be prepared. If they couldn’t be bothered to put in the work to be ready for one of the toughest environments to play in, then I have no sympathy for them. I suspect y’all don’t either. This is the NFL; no excuse for not being ready for opening day.
Edit: Not that y’all are defending them. I don’t want to take away from the win when the Seahawks came to play.
Aseahawkfan wrote:My buddy said passing during the weather conditions in Chicago impossible. He's a hardcore Seattle fan who thinks we will beat Frisco. But even he told me not to judge Trey off that Chicago game. He said they were playing in a torrential downpour and the field was a slip and slide. So I guess we'll see.
trents wrote:Justin Fields played in the same weather conditions during that game. Fields' QB rating was 85.7 and Lance's was 50.3. And SF's rushing attack outgained that of the Bears 176 yd. to 99. That should have helped Lance.
MackStrongIsMyHero wrote:Well, they had every chance to be prepared. If they couldn’t be bothered to put in the work to be ready for one of the toughest environments to play in, then I have no sympathy for them. I suspect y’all don’t either. This is the NFL; no excuse for not being ready for opening day.
Edit: Not that y’all are defending them. I don’t want to take away from the win when the Seahawks came to play.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 47 guests