RiverDog wrote:Mixed results for sure. Geno has looked good, but he got away with murder throwing late while running to his left. Denver has been getting some pressure on him. But the defense sucks, especially the run defense. We've let them out of jail twice.
I-5 wrote:Talk about getting away with murder, both Adams and Diggs dropped Russ balls in their bread baskets. Geno has been more accurate. I like how he steps up when pressured instead of trying to spin out.
trents wrote:Geno hasn't taken a shot downfield yet. All short and medium stuff.
RiverDog wrote:Why do we keep throwing the ball short to Metcalf on these little bubble screen-type passes? He's not a fart in the skillet receiver.
trents wrote:Boy, Geno is showing some good wheels tonight!
Aseahawkfan wrote:I don't care what any fan or any expert or anyone says, Pete is selling out to win this game. After this game, everything is going to be mortal again. But for this one game, Seattle is stepping above and beyond to win. Pete wants this badly.
We'll see who will win the fourth quarter. Geno knows Pete wants this game and he is being directly compared to Russ. We're seeing his best game.
trents wrote:Seattle's defensive backs have done a great job in the red zone. Wilson has had all kinds of time to get off a pass for the go ahead TD but his receivers are covered. The secondary is obviously the strength of the D. D line is just not getting any push and Wilson's only real pressure has come from a few blitzes.
trents wrote:Hold on! Wait a minute! Did you see that measurement where they gave the Denver receiver a first down even though there looked like about an inch of air between the yard marker pole and the ball's nose? What's going on there?
RiverDog wrote:Holy chit! Great win for the Hawks, but if I'm Russell, I'm not too happy. They don't trust him to gain 5 yards on 4th down and instead try a near record 64 yard FG?
RiverDog wrote:Holy chit! Great win for the Hawks, but if I'm Russell, I'm not too happy. They don't trust him to gain 5 yards on 4th down and instead try a near record 64 yard FG?
obiken wrote:Yeah I dont get that move, but yeah like you I am happy to be wrong. Looks like PC should have replaced Norton a long time ago.
obiken wrote:Sure but the intensity they showed throughout the game I havent seen from this defense for a long time. Stopping them 3 times inside the 10, epic.
c_hawkbob wrote:Hackett screwed that pooch for us! Russ has to love that he's rather take a 1 in 8 FG chance (his kicker's record from 60+) than let him try to convert a 4th and 5 with 30+ seconds left. Glad Russ didn't get the chance myself.
Great win!
trents wrote:Russ didn't have the opportunity to show his magic today. His coach took it away from him. There was plenty of time left on the clock at fourth and five initially. Russ could have gotten the first down without a problem I'm thinking since the Hawks were in prevent coverage. He could have executed three plays easy in that amount of time and gotten 15 yards closer for his FG kicker. We have the Denver head coach to thank as much for that win as we do how the Hawks played. It was an inexplicable decision. Did anyone have opportunity to hear Hackett's post game pressor remarks and his explanation for that call? I have not but I'm trying to imagine what I would say if I were in his shoes.
Aseahawkfan wrote:Geno will be the weak link all year. He's a careful QB that Pete is going to keep the training wheels on. At the end of the game Pete was playing not to lose, fortunately Russ didn't have his magic today.
Seahawks are moving in the right direction.
Aseahawkfan wrote:Russ and Hackett lost their balls. Russ don't have Pete building up his confidence any more or willing to take big chances.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 41 guests