RiverDog wrote:It isn't what Pete said so much as what he didn't say. He didn't say that we should treat Russell with respect and appreciation, which would have been the PC thing to do...pun intended. By not saying something like that, he's given a wink and a nod to those with an axe to grind, a sanctioning of their vitriolic emotions. It was a classless act by Pete not to give a former player his due by asking fans to at least tip their hats to him.
This could easily get out of control. There will be 70,000 fans, many of them under the influence of alcohol, in a confined space and with AC/DC's "Thunderstruck" blaring over the speakers. There could be fights, objects thrown onto the field, a near riot situation. Thankfully, everyone has to go through security and metal detectors, so the risk of violence is a lot lower than had those procedures not been in place, but it doesn't prevent someone from striking their head on a handrail or getting pushed down a flight of stairs.
I'm stopping short of saying that Pete is inciting a riot, but he damn sure isn't doing anything to mitigate the potential. He'd feel awfully bad if something tragic resulted.
The team newsletter that ESPN article indicated was purposeful in leaving out Wilson was already disrespectful enough. Pete and John made sure to tell the writer of the team newsletter not to give any credit to Russell Wilson for the 12-4 season. What kind of message would that send to you, the quarterback of the team, if the team purposefully left you out of the team newsletter after a 12-4 season where you had a career year? For myself the newsletter was the biggest indicator prior to the trade that the rumors of their problems were true. They straight up disrespected Russell with that season ticket holder news letter.
Some fans like to act like the team didn't do anything wrong, but Pete and John were petty and passive-aggressive in their treatment of Russ because he wasn't towing their line any more.
That's why this game and really the direction both the Seahawks and Broncos go in is important. Russell is saying "I can't win with Pete any more because the way Pete does things is bad for the team" and Pete and John said "We can win without you Russ doing it Pete's way, so we're going to rebuild using your trade to do it."
So things already reached a disrespectful and low key combative level between the two. We'll see who is right in a few years. If this rebuild with Pete don't work, I'm betting Russ is going to be privately smiling saying, "See Seattle fans, it is Pete who can't get it done. " If Russell doesn't start winning in Denver, Seattle fans will say, "Looks like Russ can't win in Denver either. Pete was right to trade him."
I can see why Pete is being a little vindictive and vice versa. I believe Russ would have stayed in Seattle happily if Pete were gone. But Russ just reached a point where he truly believes he can't win with Pete any more. He towed Pete's line for ten years. They got no closer to a Super Bowl after that loss and everything was on Russ at that point as the talent had fallen off immensely other than at the receiver position. Probably same reason Brady tired of towing the line with Bill B. Russ felt like he needed greater say in personnel management to win because Pete and John were failing to rebuild a winning team. I can see a competitor like Russ feeling that way as he knows better than the fans what's going on on the field leading to the issues other than his mistakes being the focal point of every single loss.