trents wrote:Lock looked sharp until that bonehead INT. He has a good pocket presence and a strong and accurate arm. Vision and decision making is still a question.
trents wrote:Lock looked sharp until that bonehead INT. He has a good pocket presence and a strong and accurate arm. Vision and decision making is still a question.
RiverDog wrote:That seems to be the problem with Drew Lock. It was the same story in the Steelers game. He looks great until on one play, he makes a huge, fatal mistake that ends up costing his team the game. After watching him in preseason, it's no wonder the Broncos decided to cut bait.
Hawktawk wrote:I missed the 4th quarter so can’t really comment on that . Geno threw 7 passes . 3 were caught . 3 were dropped. 1 Drew a pi against Fant and was a perfect throw in itself which is why the guy fouled Fant . I dunno . Awful sack thought I was watching Russ for a minute![]()
What the hell im optimistic . When I said Geno played starter quality ball probably 9 months ago leading to a boat sized raft of crap I never dreamed he might be starting here . Give him a chance when the games count and he’s got 60 minutes with the 1s . I think you will be pleasantly shocked by our offense .
tarlhawk wrote:Very disappointed by the QB "competition"...how does a QB gain ability to read when a corner or safety is "baiting" him? Experience but you don't gain experience from not playing and practicing against your better defenders...I'll defer to Pete's judgement that it was a fair trial that Drew lost out on. As a fan my opinion bears no weight of understanding what goes on behind closed sessions. I wish Geno the best and he'll do better on this team than anywhere else because of the strong supporting cast he'll continue to have...my only real knock is I don't find him inspiring. A "point guard" feeds a lot of balls to the play makers...but the occasional 3-point play from your QB would give some spark at times. Go Hawks (please)
c_hawkbob wrote:It's Geno to start the season and I just can't get excited about it, I do suspect it'll be a short run though once SF releases Jimmy G. . . . Still looking like a 6-7 win team to me.
NorthHawk wrote:I think Pete gave Geno the ball at the start. However, Geno began to fumble it away even though he didn't have much competition.
That's the worrying thing - he doesn't have the ability to seize the moment and make it his. So I expect middling QB play where we will see some good plays and some real bonehead plays.
But that's life without a top QB.
My projection as well. Jimmy G. has holes in his game but would likely be somewhat of an upgrade to what we have to work with now.
NorthHawk wrote:I liked how both Dallas and Homer hit the hole when given the ball. No hesitation like we've seen before from our RB's.
It seems like it was AP's influence that turned that switch on.
We also saw some pre snap motion (which should help younger QBs identify Man or Zone coverage) and throws to the RBs.
Both good signs of progress.
Myles Adams and Michael Jackson looked good enough to keep.
The OL look pretty good in general but Cross was beaten badly by fellow rookie Sam Williams a couple of times. Apparently he had his number in College, too as well as the 1 on 1s at the Sr. Bowl.
Curhan and Lucas look like a good pairing on the right side.
A lot of players drop balls thrown by Geno. Is it something he does differently from other QBs that cause this? Perhaps a lack of touch, but we will see in the regular season how the #1s do.
DL needs work but some flashes of competence. LBs didn't stand out much to me but there was a lot of personnel changes.
ST looked a little better.
curmudgeon wrote:2 to 3 wins at best. Lack of talent is glaring. Time for regime change….
NorthHawk wrote:Jimmy is currently expected to get $24M so he would probably want at least that and even more probable he would want a multi-year contract.
Would we be willing to pay him $100M over 4 years with $75M guaranteed? Is JG worth that?
It wouldn't surprise me if Pete panicked and even traded a 1st for him after seeing this off season. And that might mean being out of the top QB sweepstakes next year.
curmudgeon wrote:2 to 3 wins at best. Lack of talent is glaring. Time for regime change….
trents wrote:It's really hard to say when you're only looking at preseason game data but it looks like we may have a better run blocking OL than we've had for some time. Dallas and Homer have both been on the team for multiple years but they both looked like featured backs in preseason so I attribute that to better OL play.
I don't think John would allow that. That would be one of those times when they both went to have ownership settle it. We are not in position to contend this year. If Pete can't see that, he shouldn't even be head coach any more. There is a discipline to team building that both John and Pete had when they arrived where you know where you are in a rebuild process and don't make desperate moves. This team isn't one junkyard QB away from contention. Pete should want to see his defense perform at a high level before he does anything desperate like trade a 1st rounder away. He's going to need that pick for a QB or a better defensive player.
RiverDog wrote:Actually, our OL in 2020 was pretty decent. We were ranked 6th in the league in yards per attempt and PFF had our OL ranked 14th in run blocking before we slipped to 25th in 2021. I'll be happy if they can match our 2020 performance.
Dallas and Homer both looked great, especially DJ Dallas. Heck, he even looked good on special teams, nearly getting a punt block.
RiverDog wrote:Actually, our OL in 2020 was pretty decent. We were ranked 6th in the league in yards per attempt and PFF had our OL ranked 14th in run blocking before we slipped to 25th in 2021. I'll be happy if they can match our 2020 performance.
Dallas and Homer both looked great, especially DJ Dallas. Heck, he even looked good on special teams, nearly getting a punt block.
trents wrote:With Penny being an injury magnet and Walker out for a while from hernia surgery, Dallas and/or Homer may get their chance to shine this year.
NorthHawk wrote:I would hope that wouldn’t happen but we haven’t made great trades of late.
Pete has final say on all personnel and they did make that horrendous Adams trade when Pete panicked, so a
precedent has been made. Maybe they learned something then, but also maybe Pete having seen the QB play this
off season realizes that an upgrade is necessary. Thus they give away the farm again for what might be another marginal player.
I just wouldn’t put it past him.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 66 guests