NorthHawk wrote:His deal isn’t as good as Watsons but like Watson, it’s still a lot of money for a QB who hasn’t accomplished much in his career.
Teams are betting that a massive Cap expansion is in the near future so in a couple of years it won’t have as big of a hit.
Murray now has to prove he’s worth the money. I’m not yet sure he is.
NorthHawk wrote:His deal isn’t as good as Watsons but like Watson, it’s still a lot of money for a QB who hasn’t accomplished much in his career.
Teams are betting that a massive Cap expansion is in the near future so in a couple of years it won’t have as big of a hit.
Murray now has to prove he’s worth the money. I’m not yet sure he is.
Hawktawk wrote:If Watson was an overpay this is AZ getting absolutely swindled. He’s shorter than Russ , he’s done very little to distinguish himself . He played worse as the season went on . And attitude wise he’s a 5’8” cam Newton pouting when things go wrong . Glad they signed him . Az will be in the dumpster soon .
NorthHawk wrote:AZ was in a bind. Like a lot of teams who are trying to get to the big dance. Besides, he puts butts in seats, so more money.
What do they do, not re-sign him? He wouldn’t accept less than what he thinks is fair so they had to pay up.
We will be in that same position if we select a top QB that makes the Pro Bowl a couple of times before his contract is up.
Except if this trend continues it will be for a lot more.
NorthHawk wrote:There’s an interesting clause in Murray’s new contract that stipulates he must spend 4 hours studying for the next game or possibly
lose some of his salary guarantees. They were talking about it on NFL Live and it was pointed out that the best QBs don’t need any
type of contractual clause as they are self motivated.
There was no issue with Wilson and certainly no issue like this with any of the best QBs
in the NFL, so Murray may never be as good as he can be because he doesn’t want to put the effort in and it might be
the difference between winning a SB or not.
jshawaii22 wrote:Watched some talking heads today discussing who the next 'big' contract to break the bank, and it looks like Russell took the #1, with a prediction of 60-65m, 150m guarantee for 3 years... I'm looking forward to our rookie next year in the draft in the first round and getting back to that rookie contract advantage.
Aseahawkfan wrote:
I have to admit the more I analyze this trade, the more I like it. We really did get a king's ransom for Russell and a chance to build up a team to compete, then insert a QB. If Pete pulls this off, it may well become the new model for the NFL.
We got a great number of picks. Denver traded us some of their best players. Shelby Harris led the team in sacks. Noah Fant had almost as many yards as their best WR with multiple different QBs throwing to him.
Denver's team really isn't that stacked with talent. They lost Von Miller. Their best pass rusher Harris they traded to us. Their top receiving TE they traded to us. Their O-line isn't that highly rated. They do have some pretty good platoon RBs though. Each one put up 900 yards and 200 plus yards receiving each. They have a completely new coach. Vic Fangio is gone who made their defense as strong as it was. Hackett is a real wild card. If he turns out to suck as a coach, Broncos could dump really hard in that division.
Seems Schneider and Pete made a pretty damn good risk-reward call and picked up some great developed talent and draft picks.
obiken wrote:Watson broke the bank on salaries, its going to be hard once a QB gets a 2nd contact, to keep a good team around him. The #1 reason TB is the GOAT, if in fact he is, is his willingness to take pay-cuts. Lamar Jackson's contract will be interesting. The new smart model for the Salary cap era, is to get a really good QB in the draft, he is good in his 2nd or 3rd year, ride the wave of success, then drop him after 5 and repeat. I believe Russ was right, but you cannot cry too loud unless you want to go the Tommy terrific mode.
NorthHawk wrote:When the new media contracts are finalized, the new Cap will mitigate the hit of the big contracts. It's expected to be a $30 - $50 Million increase in just a few years. I think that's what teams are counting on with these big contracts.
Aseahawkfan wrote:I have to admit the more I analyze this trade, the more I like it. We really did get a king's ransom for Russell and a chance to build up a team to compete, then insert a QB. If Pete pulls this off, it may well become the new model for the NFL.
We got a great number of picks. Denver traded us some of their best players. Shelby Harris led the team in sacks. Noah Fant had almost as many yards as their best WR with multiple different QBs throwing to him.
Denver's team really isn't that stacked with talent. They lost Von Miller. Their best pass rusher Harris they traded to us. Their top receiving TE they traded to us. Their O-line isn't that highly rated. They do have some pretty good platoon RBs though. Each one put up 900 yards and 200 plus yards receiving each. They have a completely new coach. Vic Fangio is gone who made their defense as strong as it was. Hackett is a real wild card. If he turns out to suck as a coach, Broncos could dump really hard in that division.
Seems Schneider and Pete made a pretty damn good risk-reward call and picked up some great developed talent and draft picks.
NorthHawk wrote:It's all about potential at this point.
However, this regime hasn't shown a great talent selecting players in the first round.
These should be higher picks than when we were missing in the late 1st, but still, the stink of missing badly on 1sts lingers.
They have to hit on all of them this and next year for the trade to even out. And if they don't find a Franchise QB, it will never be equal.
They get too focused on SPARQ in the first round.
Sometimes you need to take the slightly lesser athlete who can play football well.
NorthHawk wrote:It's all about potential at this point.
However, this regime hasn't shown a great talent selecting players in the first round.
These should be higher picks than when we were missing in the late 1st, but still, the stink of missing badly on 1sts lingers.
They have to hit on all of them this and next year for the trade to even out. And if they don't find a Franchise QB, it will never be equal.
RiverDog wrote:They need to hit on all 5 draft picks for the trade to even out? So if we end up with 4 Pro Bowlers and one bust does that mean that the Broncos won the trade regardless of how Fant, Lock, and Harris perform? Come on, man!
It was a hugely complicated trade, and it will take several years to figure out who won and who lost. We have 3 potential starters, and their performance will factor into the equation along with the draft choices (officially this season it's Charles Cross and Boye Mafe) and the three picks we get next season, and that's just one side of it. The other side is how Denver performs with Russell Wilson as their QB. If they sign him to a $65M, 5 year contract and they never make it out of the first round of the playoffs, then it won't take very much out of our side of the equation to balance that out.
RiverDog wrote:They need to hit on all 5 draft picks for the trade to even out? So if we end up with 4 Pro Bowlers and one bust does that mean that the Broncos won the trade regardless of how Fant, Lock, and Harris perform? Come on, man!
It was a hugely complicated trade, and it will take several years to figure out who won and who lost. We have 3 potential starters, and their performance will factor into the equation along with the draft choices (officially this season it's Charles Cross and Boye Mafe) and the three picks we get next season, and that's just one side of it. The other side is how Denver performs with Russell Wilson as their QB. If they sign him to a $65M, 5 year contract and they never make it out of the first round of the playoffs, then it won't take very much out of our side of the equation to balance that out.
Aseahawkfan wrote:Denver put all their eggs in one basket on one great player.
Seattle has some eggs that can break and still come out well.
I'm as big a Russ fan as anyone. But even I would not be excited to pay him 60 mil a year. Players are becoming way too expensive and football is too much of a team sport for these insane salary discrepancies.
RiverDog wrote:It's a bigger gamble on Denver's part than it was ours, that's for sure.
The other thing to consider is that Russell had just one year left on his current deal, and if he wasn't going to sign an extension with us and given that we weren't firing Pete, then it was extremely wise to trade him now as the only other option would have been an extremely expensive franchise tag for a player that doesn't want to play for the head coach. This team wasn't going anywhere this season, with or without Russell, so turning down an offer like that for what would be at best a wild card playoff berth would have been absurd.
jshawaii22 wrote:Come on man, Russell checked out sometime during the Covid years and didn't want to play for us (Pete?) anymore so nothing else matters at that point. You can't have a Pro-Bowl level QB totally unhappy and think he's going to stay out his contract + 2 more years. Forget it! We did exactly what we needed to do to start the non-rebuild.
Now, if they were smart JS/Pete would bite the bullet and trade DK as his 'value' has gone to his head and he's not worth 100 million over 4 years with the young QB's we'll have to wait on a little for probably the next two (if we'll lucky) and probably three years.
I think he is worth at least a good #1 and another pick. What a great deal for us. If you're going to non-tank, do it right and get set up to draft top talent we'll need. Exactly what the Rams did, by the way.
jshawaii22 wrote:Russell asked to be traded last year and gave us a list of 4 teams. When no deal was reached he played last year as he had no choice and sure didn't look like the 'old' Russell to me. He also kind of screwed the team by inserting himself back into the game after his hand injury before he was ready to go. The frustration was obvious to me just watching it on TV as the season went on.
This year he expanded his list, and probably went out and negotiated his own trade. There is no way he was coming back. The deal with Denver was pretty good. Now it is really up to the new players and draft over this and next year to make a difference.
jshawaii22 wrote:Russell asked to be traded last year and gave us a list of 4 teams. When no deal was reached he played last year as he had no choice and sure didn't look like the 'old' Russell to me. He also kind of screwed the team by inserting himself back into the game after his hand injury before he was ready to go. The frustration was obvious to me just watching it on TV as the season went on.
This year he expanded his list, and probably went out and negotiated his own trade. There is no way he was coming back. The deal with Denver was pretty good. Now it is really up to the new players and draft over this and next year to make a difference.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 50 guests