Hawktawk wrote:Let’s win with him now . Fant is the most exciting part of the package . Although Lock has thrown him 74 passes already which is interesting should he wind up starting .
Dissley is a better receiver than this analysis says and he’s a road grading blocker. Hes had injury issues .
Parkinson is snake bit a lot like Penny. He’s been unlucky with foot and toe injuries and just hasn’t had a healthy TC one time . I know Pete loved him . Overall it’s an above average group just like wideouts and backs other then quarter’s. So let’s see what happens. Read a pretty optimistic Field Gulls article pointing out reasons Seattle might outperform expectations . Our offensive skill people are listed as one reason . It’s a huge part of my wager .
NorthHawk wrote:I think we bring in a veteran T sometime this year. Browns ship seems to have sailed but Eric Fisher and Reilly Reiff are still available.
There’s just so much youth and inexperience at the Tackle positions that it almost seems a no brainer.
Curhan has only played in 15 games (5 starts) and Stone Forsythe 10 (0 starts). So we’re really inexperienced on the edges.
Hawktawk wrote:I agree with Pete . We’re a few players away depending on the Qb position from being right there . And once again Duane Brown remains unsigned along with a number of FAs we declined to offer deals to . It’s a better team overall than the one that beat AZ 38-30. And that was with all world turning it over for 14 points . We will shock the world baby !
NorthHawk wrote:We need the following to become a contender:
QB, Interior OL, Experienced OTs, Pass Rush, and DBs.
The IOL didn’t play well very last year. Jackson was a disappointment, Lewis regressed after being put in an unfamiliar position, and our Center was sub par. It remains to be seen if they will improve this year. This year we are going from Brown who was a 2nd team Pro Bowler and Shell, who was steady if unspectacular at the Tackle positions. This year we are going with starters who total 15 starts amongst the 4 of them. It’s a definite downgrade for at least a year.
On the Defensive side, we still haven’t created a pass rush that’s consistent and dependable some 4 years after Pete said it was a priority.
It’s just hope that we will get one this year, and maybe improbable. The DBs got some good draft choices but they are pretty green and like
the rookie OTs, will have to take time developing. We lost one of last year’s starting DBs in FA and both Safeties are coming off injuries.
So in all, we have a big hill to climb this year. If they let the rookies play and develop then it should be a different story next year and the
years after. But Pete has a history of pulling younger players when they make mistakes in the hope of winning today.
I hope he’s changed for the long term benefit.
Aseahawkfan wrote:This Shelby Harris guy is better than I thought at least his numbers. He's gonna add some nice pass rush to the D-line if he maintains his performance.
NorthHawk wrote:We need the following to become a contender:
QB, Interior OL, Experienced OTs, Pass Rush, and DBs.
The IOL didn’t play well very last year. Jackson was a disappointment, Lewis regressed after being put in an unfamiliar position, and our Center was sub par. It remains to be seen if they will improve this year. This year we are going from Brown who was a 2nd team Pro Bowler and Shell, who was steady if unspectacular at the Tackle positions. This year we are going with starters who total 15 starts amongst the 4 of them. It’s a definite downgrade for at least a year.
On the Defensive side, we still haven’t created a pass rush that’s consistent and dependable some 4 years after Pete said it was a priority.
It’s just hope that we will get one this year, and maybe improbable. The DBs got some good draft choices but they are pretty green and like
the rookie OTs, will have to take time developing. We lost one of last year’s starting DBs in FA and both Safeties are coming off injuries.
So in all, we have a big hill to climb this year. If they let the rookies play and develop then it should be a different story next year and the
years after. But Pete has a history of pulling younger players when they make mistakes in the hope of winning today.
I hope he’s changed for the long term benefit.
MackStrongIsMyHero wrote:Perhaps when he had the veteran players to do it, he would yank them. Back when the roster was torn down and rebuilt in his first few years here, the young guys got their opportunities. I think this season is going to look a lot like Pete's first season. Going to compete in most games and likely lose several close ones. Hoping to be surprised and see them get along quicker or get some breaks going their way.
MackStrongIsMyHero wrote:Definitely misremembered that. Thinking we didn't get into the playoffs and beat the Saints with bad losses during the season. Now hoping it doesn't look too much like that season.
NorthHawk wrote:Maybe when he walked out ot that press conference, he did some soul searching and decided that a Defensive philosophy change was in order.
It's hard to believe that he would do that after about 40 years of program creation and pretty good success that he would suddenly change.
But supposedly here we are. We'll see how the Defense actually does change and how much of the 3-4 concepts are implemented as part of the base Defense.
We should have our answers in a little over a month.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 47 guests