Aseahawkfan wrote:I'm not a huge fan of Sean Payton. But I don't have much control who is coach. It's not a vote, so I'd watch at least like I always do.
NorthHawk wrote:I read an article that said Payton wants to go to a warm weather team so that would leave us out.
However, we have a history of the HC having full personnel control which he supposedly wants and he
probably won’t get it in Dallas with Jerruh’s ego in the mix. Dolphins? Maybe but would they get rid of
their first year HC so quickly along with their GM? Maybe he ends up back in NO.
Aseahawkfan wrote:I want Jim Harbaugh. He still has something to prove.
c_hawkbob wrote:I think I just threw up in my mouth a little.
c_hawkbob wrote:I think I just threw up in my mouth a little.
Aseahawkfan wrote:He's insane, but he wants to win.
NorthHawk wrote:A couple of years ago during the season when we were struggling, Pete in his post game press conference looked like a coach
ready to pull the plug. He had the look of a weary man who just about had enough. So maybe in recent years he’s getting
closer to make that decision. When asked how long he expects to coach after signing his latest contract he said it was for
five years but in actuality he was taking it year to year depending on a number of factors including health and
enjoyment of coaching. A couple of bad years might push him to make that decision before his contract expires.
NorthHawk wrote:A couple of years ago during the season when we were struggling, Pete in his post game press conference looked like a coach
ready to pull the plug. He had the look of a weary man who just about had enough. So maybe in recent years he’s getting
closer to make that decision. When asked how long he expects to coach after signing his latest contract he said it was for
five years but in actuality he was taking it year to year depending on a number of factors including health and
enjoyment of coaching. A couple of bad years might push him to make that decision before his contract expires.
Hawktawk wrote:A couple of things here . #1 Pete and John aren’t planning to tank . Doesn’t mean they won’t suck. They have made roster moves in free agency and in a plug and play blue chip draft . They are at least trying to sign Dk and I’ve seen film of him practicing with Geno . I will never buy that Pete plans on a rebuild at his age . If that’s how it turns out Pete might walk away or Jody might fire his ass too.
As for Payton , where’s the beef? What evidence is there that he’s a significant upgrade ? He had one of the most prolific passers , most prolific in many categories . Last time they won was 2009. And in 2010 I saw PC coach Beast Quake and smoke that defending super bowl team with a 7-9 embarrassment of a division winner . Pete’s better . I don’t want that smug pr@ck. I don’t want Hairball either . I want playoffs . Then story goes away .
RiverDog wrote:Who said that Pete and John are planning on tanking?
Pete will never use the word 'rebuild.' It doesn't fit with his 'win forever' motto. That doesn't mean he won't make a sacrifice or two in the short term in order to achieve a long term goal. There is some evidence that he's had a change in heart, that he doesn't view our team as being just a player or two short from a SB contender. We haven't seen the player-for-draft pick trades like we have in the past, at least not yet. Last season, we went into the draft with just 3 picks, having traded them away for players. Plus the way they went about this year's draft was an obvious change in philosophy, ie not trading down to accumulate picks like we have so many times in the past. IMO something has changed.
I don't necessarily want Payton, either. Not because he's a 'smug pr!ck,' as you put it, but rather that I agree with you that he's not an upgrade. I'd rather take a chance on a relative unknown.
NorthHawk wrote:Payton is a coach who can develop a young QB. He also designs his Offenses around what the QB does best and limits what he doesn’t.
That’s pretty much essential in today’s offenses. as it limits mistakes and breeds confidence. There are some QBs who can play well in any system but nobody is certain who they are until they have a few years under their belt.
As we will probably be selecting a QB early in 2023 or 2024, he would be a good coach for that QB to play under.
But, Payton is reported to let it be known he wants to go to a warm weather location so he’s out of the running here.
RiverDog wrote:Who said that Pete and John are planning on tanking?
Pete will never use the word 'rebuild.' It doesn't fit with his 'win forever' motto. That doesn't mean he won't make a sacrifice or two in the short term in order to achieve a long term goal. There is some evidence that he's had a change in heart, that he doesn't view our team as being just a player or two short from a SB contender. We haven't seen the player-for-draft pick trades like we have in the past, at least not yet. Last season, we went into the draft with just 3 picks, having traded them away for players. Plus the way they went about this year's draft was an obvious change in philosophy, ie not trading down to accumulate picks like we have so many times in the past. IMO something has changed.
I don't necessarily want Payton, either. Not because he's a 'smug pr!ck,' as you put it, but rather that I agree with you that he's not an upgrade. I'd rather take a chance on a relative unknown.
Aseahawkfan wrote:I don't like unknowns. That's why I prefer Harbaugh. I know he can build a winning team on both sides of the ball and make it to a Super Bowl. Harbaugh coached Frisco for four years. He went to two conference Championships and a Super Bowl during that time period. That's with Colin K at QB and he had their defense in the top 5 3 of their 4 years and designed an offense to make a guy like Colin K shine enough to be a legitimate Super Bowl contender and Colin K isn't even in the league any more.
Harbaugh is a bit of a loon. But that dude knows how to get a team to win and will build a tough team on both sides of the ball and he can get the most out of a QB.
Harbaugh still wants a Lombardi. He wants it bad. He don't like sitting around the table with his brother John and stomaching John has a Lombardi and he doesn't.
You say you like a guy who wants to win. Harbaugh is that guy. He turned Frisco's talent around in his first year to a Conference Championship game and division championship.
You give Jim Harbaugh talent and he'll win. He'll get the most out of the talent and he won't stop until they win.
RiverDog wrote:It's been a long time ago, but I remember our debates about Hairball and his tenure with the Niners. As I recall, he walked into a fairly full cupboard as the Niners had had accumulated a lot of top draft picks, he inherited a very good offensive line, then left the team in a shambles after he got into it with his GM. The fact that the Niners really tanked immediately following his departure (5-11 in 2015, 2-14 in 2016) doesn't speak well for his ability to build a team.
On a side note, Hairball has intentionally embroiled himself into controversy by making some very public statements about his POV about abortion.
Aseahawkfan wrote:That team wasn't doing much before he got there and didn't do much after he left for quite a few years. He certainly didn't screw up the cupboard as the GM won the power struggle and had him fired because he didn't like the talent the GM was drafting. Seems he was right as the team fell off a cliff after he left. So not sure how you blame him for "building a team" when he didn't have control over personnel which is one of the reasons he fought with the GM. He took what he had and built them into a Super Bowl contender from the first year he arrived. You revising history to make it seem like he was somehow "building the team" is not what was going on.
Aseahawkfan wrote:As far as the media going after him for speaking like a Catholic is taught to speak on abortion, not sure why that's a big deal. He's a private citizen with the right to speak his mind. It was done at an even specifically for that type of thing, not some random comments on an NFL sideline.
Aseahawkfan wrote:In my opinion, Pete is setting Hurtt to take over for him.
RiverDog wrote:Regardless of who's fault it was, there was a huge drop off starting with Harbaugh's last season (8-8) and imploding immediately after he left. He may not be completely responsible for their demise, but neither did he build anything.
Understood and agreed. I was merely expressing my preference. Regardless of what social or political issue is at hand, I would rather keep my sports separate from them. It's a distraction that we don't need. Would you like it if Pete went out and gave campaign speeches for Biden or Trump?
I dunno. Pete hasn't worked with Hurtt prior to this season. It would be a little unusual for a head coach to be grooming as his replacement a person that he barely knows.
RiverDog wrote:Understood and agreed. I was merely expressing my preference. Regardless of what social or political issue is at hand, I would rather keep my sports separate from them. It's a distraction that we don't need. Would you like it if Pete went out and gave campaign speeches for Biden or Trump?
Aseahawkfan wrote:Pete is clearly a Democrat. Often speaks out in support of issues like diversity in coaching and supporting guys like Colin K's right to kneel. He's the right liberal, so gets less liberal media attacks. Not like he's quiet about his political stance. The liberal media doesn't go after because he's one of them. I don't think Harbaugh should be punished for being more conservative. I'm surprised you think that's ok.
RiverDog wrote:I dunno. Pete hasn't worked with Hurtt prior to this season. It would be a little unusual for a head coach to be grooming as his replacement a person that he barely knows.
Aseahawkfan wrote:Hurtt has been here since 2017. So not sure what you're talking about on this one.
Sean Desai is the one who just came on.
Aseahawkfan wrote:Hurtt has been here since 2017. So not sure what you're talking about on this one.
Sean Desai is the one who just came on.
RiverDog wrote:My bad. Thanks for the correction.
govandals wrote:I'm on the fence as far as Sean Patyon goes. He is a decent coach who benefited from a great qb. Hmm... where have I heard that before. lol I have no doubt if ownership throws enough dollars at him he will come here. Who knows, he may be our best choice come that time.
Harbaugh?? Really? Why even bother throwing his name out there? No chance he gets another NFL shot. He can coach at the college level where the roster turns over every 2-4 years. Longterm NFL guy? no chance now.
c_hawkbob wrote:We've had a respected head coach pick and groom a successor before, keep in mind how that worked out before wish it upon us again.
Aseahawkfan wrote:We'll see what happens. Hurtt still has to perform. He sounds like he will bust his ass to take advantage of the chance.
Not sure if you're talking about Mora, but he was more a Ruskell pick than Holmgren. Ruskell was setting him up to replace The Walrus. That didn't work out too well.
Aseahawkfan wrote:We'll see what happens. Hurtt still has to perform. He sounds like he will bust his ass to take advantage of the chance.
Not sure if you're talking about Mora, but he was more a Ruskell pick than Holmgren. Ruskell was setting him up to replace The Walrus. That didn't work out too well.
Hawktawk wrote:Mora didn’t get a fair shake . He inherited a 4-12 team with a bare cupboard and was given 1 year .
Wasn’t surprising they only won 5 and then 7 the next 2 . And we won’t argue the results in hindsight . But letting Mora get up and give the state of the team interview while literally trying to close the deal with Pete at that moment and firing Mora as soon as the deal was final was just using him as option 2 if it fell through . It was a classless move by a classy organization . I agree he was a Ruskell guy . Tim brought us the best of times and the worst of times .
tarlhawk wrote:I still think Pete will play out his contract...while "grooming" Sean Desai or Clint Hurtt or even Shane Waldron.
I'd peg the chances of him finishing out his contract at no more than 50/50
Hawktawk wrote:Mora didn’t get a fair shake . He inherited a 4-12 team with a bare cupboard and was given 1 year .
Wasn’t surprising they only won 5 and then 7 the next 2 . And we won’t argue the results in hindsight . But letting Mora get up and give the state of the team interview while literally trying to close the deal with Pete at that moment and firing Mora as soon as the deal was final was just using him as option 2 if it fell through . It was a classless move by a classy organization . I agree he was a Ruskell guy . Tim brought us the best of times and the worst of times .
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 50 guests