tarlhawk wrote:It seems a lot of people are contrasting power tackles who explode out of their 3 point stance and burst under the pads of the DE/Edge they face to blow open a running lane ...against what we drafted...two gifted athletic tackles (from a lamentable pass heavy 2 point stance system). This will likely limit the between the tackle A and B gaps leverage for run blocking...but at the same time gives quick transition to getting into seal block assignments on the outside corners...need RB speed and quick athletic pulling guards/tackles.
Penny and Walker III have the necessary burst to get outside and up field quickly with a quick block from that sides Tackle/TE/WR against the DE/LB trying to set/contain the "edge". Quick athletic tackles are also a big aid to our seldom called screens. Waldron should have a good feel of what areas of his scheme/play calling can be utilized to spring our Penny/Walker duo early into the 2022 season. Its just a "wait and see" ...plenty of anxiety and until potential flashes consistently into execution (moving the chains)...there will be lowered expectations. Go Hawks
c_hawkbob wrote:10 or 15 lbs ain't much for a 300+ pounder. I speak from experience.
Putting on even 30 lbs or adding the strength necessary for pro competition is pretty low on my list of worries for Cross. Of much more immediate concern is his learning curve, and hopefully he can keep that tight. I too don't expect all pro rookie seasons for either of our bookends, but have high hopes for year 2.
tarlhawk wrote:My point from my earlier comment was even though our rookie tackle (s) will take plenty of lumps this year...their athleticism can still be of value for implementing some of Waldron's playbook that utilize their ability to quickly get outside with the opportunity to get some seal blocks on the opponent's Edge setters...perhaps "springing" Penny/Walker around the outside corners/screens...even jet sweeps(Eskridge/Melton). Not expecting anything foolish like any all-pro attention...QB mobility and RB ability to "get skinny" and into LB territory will be keys.
NorthHawk wrote:Pete won’t permit a QB to be a gunslinger. McVay might be OK with it, but Pete won’t stand for it.
If he wouldn’t allow an extremely accurate passer in Wilson to be one, do you really think he will allow
a much less accurate QB that freedom? We saw what happened when Schottenheimer opened up the Offense
a little. At the first sign of trouble Pete shut it down. I expect the changes we will see will be limited to
pre snap motion and possibly attacking the edges. But with such inexperienced Tackles who will be over
matched early in their careers runs wide will have difficulty early along with any deep passes that take
time for the routes to develop.
Some of you like offense, so you try to paint these ridiculous ideas that offense is what is needed. And some of us like defense, so we'd prefer a really strong defense. But the reality is lots of ways to win a championship. Pete's way works. McVay's way works. Bill B's way. Andy Reid's way. Holmgren's way. Doug Pedersen's way. Lots of ways to win, but mainly just stack a lot of talent, scheme to your talent, and try to get it to all come together when you hit the playoffs.
Quite a few coaches have proven they know how to do that.
Hawktawk wrote:The Waldron offense is reliant upon patterns that insure an open man virtually every play but are often run out of the sane formations , motion etc. the point is it’s a first read , maybe second then run or throw it away . It’s of note Stafford threw 17 picks and 4 for 6 and has a Lombardi . He had lots of help but point is it’s a gunslinger mentality grip and rip offense which both our dog meat QBs play that game . Throw to NFL open windows . I’ll also point out that our potential starter Geno took 13 sacks in 13 quarters which would be over 60 for the year . He played 3 nasty defenses in Pittsburgh , saints , and Rams so it might have leveled off but point being he got hammered and still had some pretty nice throws . Good to great qb play helps a young line as much as a good run game I’m certain we will have . Joe Burrow got sacked 75 times , 7 in the Super Bowl and 9 in the divisional . I think we have 2 disrespected QBs who are big strong big arm guys not afraid to get hit . We will be ok .
obiken wrote:Sure, but the league has changed, no way you get away with kind of hits that Kam Chancellor laid on people. I can say without question, in the Salary cap era, you have to have a Good GM, and you only pay for a franchise QB, weapons, a LT an edge rusher, and CB to cover. You do not pay massive money to a RB, Safety, or MLB any more, you just can't. Moreover, PC's way was 10 years ago now, its gone all offense. As I said to HT on another thread, NO defense can cover Mahomy, Hill, and Kelsey, nor can they cover a Josh Allen and a Diggs. This is why I think the Broncos are the most dangerous team in the league. IF AZ looses Hopkins they were done, that's why they went out and got another one, Allen looses Diggs its over, Rogers is not going to replace Devonte Adams, you just cant. Denver has 4 good not great ones, injuries are not going to hurt them as much as other teams. Bengals proved that all you need is a defense that is mediocre, and a great offense, and you are a contender. It was probably headed that way with Walsh anyway. In 05 we had the best offense in the league, and we went to a SB. Now with all the rule changes, offenses rule, defenses drool. PC, Bilicheat, Zimmer, their are all dinosaurs.
tarlhawk wrote:My point from my earlier comment was even though our rookie tackle (s) will take plenty of lumps this year...their athleticism can still be of value for implementing some of Waldron's playbook that utilize their ability to quickly get outside with the opportunity to get some seal blocks on the opponent's Edge setters...perhaps "springing" Penny/Walker around the outside corners/screens...even jet sweeps(Eskridge/Melton). Not expecting anything foolish like any all-pro attention...QB mobility and RB ability to "get skinny" and into LB territory will be keys.
obiken wrote:That is just not true, I am not pro offense, I love defense and a Running but come on, your arguments sound like HT just denying the evidence. There is NO evidence to show that, its more than trending towards Offense. Billy B, was the model of the SALARY CAP era, and he had QB that was legendary willing to take pay cuts to make it happen. Once Brady left its done, Pete is done, your denying trend that is already on us.
Penny demonstrated an excellent ability to get skinny and explode through narrow windows as his performance showed. And there are veteran pieces in the interior line which is where Walker and penny make lots of their big runs from . Blythe is a solid veteran center . Phil Haynes is a road grader of whom Wyman said he was the biggest rated Hawks linemen down the stretch . “ a lot of penny’s big runs went through Phil Haynes “. And again nobody wants Duane Brown . I look at how many lines Pete has had to build from scratch in college and pros . Every line is in flux . Denver is changing some pieces and gave up 40 sacks, 5 less than Seattle . Every time I turn around I’m hearing about another team with line problems . Dynastic lines are as rare as dynasties imo because they help build dynasties . Everyone else has to figure it out . We will .
obiken wrote:Penny demonstrated an excellent ability to get skinny and explode through narrow windows as his performance showed. And there are veteran pieces in the interior line which is where Walker and penny make lots of their big runs from . Blythe is a solid veteran center . Phil Haynes is a road grader of whom Wyman said he was the biggest rated Hawks linemen down the stretch . “ a lot of penny’s big runs went through Phil Haynes “. And again nobody wants Duane Brown . I look at how many lines Pete has had to build from scratch in college and pros . Every line is in flux . Denver is changing some pieces and gave up 40 sacks, 5 less than Seattle . Every time I turn around I’m hearing about another team with line problems . Dynastic lines are as rare as dynasties imo because they help build dynasties . Everyone else has to figure it out . We will .
Hawktalk the sucker bet for you and you should take it, is to bet Seattle to win the SB, you bet 100 bucks you win 10,000, just do it buddy, you know you want too!! There are better odds out there. Give a 100 to some bum in the streets, he cleans himself up, becomes a millionaire, and pays you back a million.
Hawktawk wrote:Disagree but be respectful of the most optimistic fan on the planet
RiverDog wrote:Disagree but be respectful of the most optimistic fan on the planet
NorthHawk wrote:The Offense has to be able to take advantage of the rule changes that are a detriment to Defenses
As well, because the defenses are being hamstrung relative to years ago there will be more higher scoring
games. The NFL is promoting that type of game as they think it will attract more fans. Therefore the Offense
becomes more important than the Defense in that it has to be able to get into shootouts when they arise.
Defense does play an important role, but so does the Offense and when one side of the ball struggles the other
has to pick up the slack. That’s what balance is all about except today’s game is skewed towards Offense.
Hawktawk wrote:The team that went to 2 Super Bowls and won one was 25 TDs 5 or 6 picks pounding run game including a dynamic intelligent qb who gashed teams at key moments . And a filthy d.
At the risk or certainty of a backlash let me settle the Russ vs Pete argument regarding offense. Russ got reigned in after 3 picks in the first AZ game . Wilson’s team crashed a coaches meeting on a short week to demand changes to the offense prior to the second Az game . Reports are it was not well received . But what was the result ? The Hawks beat AZ after losing earlier in the year due to Russels picks . Argument over .
RiverDog wrote:So I''m taking digs at Pete at the same rate of which you're taking shots at Russell? That is just plain not true.
Like I said before, the head coach is fair game for criticism in any team's fan base, even if you're a Pats fan taking shots at Belichick. It is not the same as your taking constant shots at a former player in nearly every comment in every thread.
And as a side note, please take a look at your last post. It's the same thing that Cbob complained about a few weeks ago. I'm not sure how you're doing it and I'm sure that it's an unintentional, honest mistake, but you're changing the quote in your posts to attribute comments you made to someone else. It's not a huge deal and I understand your issue with your broken cell phone, but it would be greatly appreciated if you took a little more care when responding to a comment.
RiverDog wrote:So I''m taking digs at Pete at the same rate of which you're taking shots at Russell? That is just plain not true.
Like I said before, the head coach is fair game for criticism in any team's fan base, even if you're a Pats fan taking shots at Belichick. It is not the same as your taking constant shots at a former player in nearly every comment in every thread.
And as a side note, please take a look at your last post. It's the same thing that Cbob complained about a few weeks ago. I'm not sure how you're doing it and I'm sure that it's an unintentional, honest mistake, but you're changing the quote in your posts to attribute comments you made to someone else. It's not a huge deal and I understand your issue with your broken cell phone, but it would be greatly appreciated if you took a little more care when responding to a comment.
Hawktawk wrote:HT has been a messy poster since 2000. Ill try to do better.
Hawktawk wrote:North can seldom post without discussing petes garbage offense bad roster etc. Its the prevailing opinion on this forum. Pete bad, Russ good. All Pete and Johns fault.
But I disagree or at least partially disagree. Im not a wimp fan that going to take it lying down what was done to my HAWKS here. Your opinions are fine,, have at it . I dont jump your $h@t every time I disagree. But if Im going to make my point about addition by subtraction its relevant to discuss former guys RECENT impact on the team. Also relevant when stories break about how he had Shottie fired then praised him publicly . Then a few weeks ago he looked in the camera and said things about a winning city that he knew exactly how it would be taken and how thousands of Hawks fans would feel hearing it.As far as I'm concerned any Hawks fan that was cool with that needs to grow a pair as a fan. Defend the rag. That is a timely relevant thing.
Hearing Denver beat reporters questioning Russel's off season jet setting around the globe is relevant![]()
. It all enters into my entire crazy theory about the guys left in the Vmac.I believe PC and JS have a fire in their bellies they haven't had for a while. There are proud men in the locker room and enough of them are good enough to do something about it.
The time for talking and speculation is drawing to a rapid close.
Hawktawk wrote:My view of the entire situation is in flux as more developments occur . I was ready to dump Pete along with most everyone when Russ was playing scissorhands and PC was walking out on his press conference . If anything that finger episode proved that right to the end Pete respected Russ and let him back on the field in a decision that surely ended any chance of playoffs . Hindsight is 2020 looking back I think I have a better understanding of what a chaotic mess that situation must have been .
Is Pete perfect ? Of course not . But clearly a great coach and as a blue collar manager of people I see Coach = boss. player =employee . Like my old man used to say “ work and keep your mouth shut “ Is Russel all bad ? Bad person ? No . Uncoachable self centered on his personal stats as a player ? Yeah . And it mattered on the bottom line . So let’s see .
As I’ve said one of my beefs is be honest . You want to throw 50 TDs . That is a personal accomplishment . And good luck with that Denver going 4 wide throwing 35 times a game . As I heard a pundit say “ He is not Payton Manning but he wants to be “.
Seattle won doing it Pete’s way . They haven’t won much since drifting away from Pete’s way. Whatever else can be said we will be playing Pete ball . Genos stat line looked a lot like Pete ball . I’m very curious how our offense will look in reality .
Hawktawk wrote:My view of the entire situation is in flux as more developments occur . I was ready to dump Pete along with most everyone when Russ was playing scissorhands and PC was walking out on his press conference . If anything that finger episode proved that right to the end Pete respected Russ and let him back on the field in a decision that surely ended any chance of playoffs . Hindsight is 2020 looking back I think I have a better understanding of what a chaotic mess that situation must have been .
Is Pete perfect ? Of course not . But clearly a great coach and as a blue collar manager of people I see Coach = boss. player =employee . Like my old man used to say “ work and keep your mouth shut “ Is Russel all bad ? Bad person ? No . Uncoachable self centered on his personal stats as a player ? Yeah . And it mattered on the bottom line . So let’s see .
As I’ve said one of my beefs is be honest . You want to throw 50 TDs . That is a personal accomplishment . And good luck with that Denver going 4 wide throwing 35 times a game . As I heard a pundit say “ He is not Payton Manning but he wants to be “.
Seattle won doing it Pete’s way . They haven’t won much since drifting away from Pete’s way. Whatever else can be said we will be playing Pete ball . Genos stat line looked a lot like Pete ball . I’m very curious how our offense will look in reality .
trents wrote:"Seattle won doing it Pete’s way . They haven’t won much since drifting away from Pete’s way."
When did they drift away from "Pete's way"? Yes, there personnel changes following the Superbowl win which prevented Pete from successfully implementing Pete's strategy but he stubbornly stuck to his strategy. Seems to me that is the problem.
NorthHawk wrote:Pete went from building a team to trying to plug holes all while the talent was wasting away.
Many of us could see what was happening but Pete just forged ahead blindly thinking we were only one or two
players away from challenging for a championship. We ended up going from one of the most talented teams to
the point where we find ourselves in a full rebuild with only a sprinkling of the talent we once had.
That’s what is meant by Pete losing his way.
This draft looked like a return to the days of building a team. it remains to be seen if that will continue in
the next few drafts. One thing that is different is they aren’t bringing in players from all over like they did
in the early years. There seems to be a lack of urgency and it makes me wonder if they think we are only
a handful of players away from a championship run and will revert back to hole plugging and trading
away good draft picks along the way.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 43 guests