Hawktawk wrote:9 of Genos 13 quarters were vs the Rams who he put 10 points 131 yards passing and 23 rushing in one quarter . Pittsburgh with possibly the best edge rusher in the league watt sacking him 5 times , tipping 3 balls he led scoring drives on 4 of our last 5 possessions s in got us to overtime on the road and advanced the ball near field goal range allowing for a second overtime possession where watt finally stopped him . Completed 72 % of his passes to 10 different receivers with a QBR of 103 in his first start in 5 years . The Saints who were his worst game but still a 65 yard laser to DK smoking Lattimore . Meyers missed 2 very makeable field goals in a 13 /10 loss . The Saints shut out Brady a couple weeks later . JAx held Buffalo to 6 points the week after we beat them 31-7 in a perfect game by Geno . The next game we got shut out with all the same players except 1 .
If he starts and plays similar to last year we win 10 minimum.
RiverDog wrote:First of all, would you please start spelling his last name correctly? It's Drew Lock, no 'e'. It's not that difficult of a name. One syllable, four letters.
Secondly, I'm hopeful as there is the chance that all he needed was the right environment, but I'm not holding my breath, either. He's had a horrible time with turnovers, and especially playing for a Pete Carroll-coached team, he's not going to get very far if he has problems with jersey identification. Considering that we are likely to have a lot of new blood on the OL, both him and Geno could have some major problems managing the rush.
I get the sense that Lock was simply a toss in for the Russell trade, so anything he contributes is frosting on the cake. Although Geno obviously has a leg up in the competition as he's already familiar with the offense and the personnel, he's more of a known quantity than Lock is. The big advantage Lock has is his age. At 32, Geno isn't our future. Lock is 7 years younger, so if he plays well, we might decide to hitch our wagon to him.
MackStrongIsMyHero wrote:I see it more as Geno flashed better in his brief stint last season than he did compared to his career. He'll need all phases other phases of the game to be working well for him to succeed, in my opinion. I'm cautiously encouraged by what he did last season, but there's a far larger body of work that runs counter to what he showed last season.
MackStrongIsMyHero wrote:I see it more as Geno flashed better in his brief stint last season than he did compared to his career. He'll need all phases other phases of the game to be working well for him to succeed, in my opinion. I'm cautiously encouraged by what he did last season, but there's a far larger body of work that runs counter to what he showed last season.
RiverDog wrote:First of all, would you please start spelling his last name correctly? It's Drew Lock, no 'e'. It's not that difficult of a name. One syllable, four letters.
Secondly, I'm hopeful as there is the chance that all he needed was the right environment, but I'm not holding my breath, either. He's had a horrible time with turnovers, and especially playing for a Pete Carroll-coached team, he's not going to get very far if he has problems with jersey identification. Considering that we are likely to have a lot of new blood on the OL, both him and Geno could have some major problems managing the rush.
I get the sense that Lock was simply a toss in for the Russell trade, so anything he contributes is frosting on the cake. Although Geno obviously has a leg up in the competition as he's already familiar with the offense and the personnel, he's more of a known quantity than Lock is. The big advantage Lock has is his age. At 32, Geno isn't our future. Lock is 7 years younger, so if he plays well, we might decide to hitch our wagon to him.
Stream Hawk wrote:First of all, would you please start spelling his last name correctly? It's Drew Lock, no 'e'. It's not that difficult of a name. One syllable, four letters.
Secondly, I'm hopeful as there is the chance that all he needed was the right environment, but I'm not holding my breath, either. He's had a horrible time with turnovers, and especially playing for a Pete Carroll-coached team, he's not going to get very far if he has problems with jersey identification. Considering that we are likely to have a lot of new blood on the OL, both him and Geno could have some major problems managing the rush.
I get the sense that Lock was simply a toss in for the Russell trade, so anything he contributes is frosting on the cake. Although Geno obviously has a leg up in the competition as he's already familiar with the offense and the personnel, he's more of a known quantity than Lock is. The big advantage Lock has is his age. At 32, Geno isn't our future. Lock is 7 years younger, so if he plays well, we might decide to hitch our wagon to him.
This^. LOL it REALLY helps one’s argument when they correctly spell the subject’s name:) Also, it’s Penny, not Penney. Lose the E. Love your passion though, HT.
Geno is a career backup. I felt like he was the worst Hawk qb since ~Stan Gelbauugh following the Pittsburgh game. He is not a good pro qb. I am moderately intrigued by Lock. He likely was a throw in during the trade, but I can’t help but be excited by his potential.
RiverDog wrote:First of all, would you please start spelling his last name correctly? It's Drew Lock, no 'e'. It's not that difficult of a name. One syllable, four letters.
Secondly, I'm hopeful as there is the chance that all he needed was the right environment, but I'm not holding my breath, either. He's had a horrible time with turnovers, and especially playing for a Pete Carroll-coached team, he's not going to get very far if he has problems with jersey identification. Considering that we are likely to have a lot of new blood on the OL, both him and Geno could have some major problems managing the rush.
I get the sense that Lock was simply a toss in for the Russell trade, so anything he contributes is frosting on the cake. Although Geno obviously has a leg up in the competition as he's already familiar with the offense and the personnel, he's more of a known quantity than Lock is. The big advantage Lock has is his age. At 32, Geno isn't our future. Lock is 7 years younger, so if he plays well, we might decide to hitch our wagon to him.
Hawktawk wrote:Ok mr word police . How about we start with you getting my handle spelled correctly ? It’s HAWKTAWK. Not HAWKTALK. It’s been my handle 20 years and I have reminded you before . And who gives a good god damn how I spell his name ? I think we know who we are talking about you think ? And Fact is Geno didn’t have a problem with turnovers here . 1 pick when a receiver was tripped but still scored as many in 1 quarter as Russ the entire second game . A fumble in overtime . But if you watched the game it should have been 2 or 3. Dude has a strong grip . Plus getting hammered all night and completing 72% it was starter quality ball . 13 quarters . I get it .
Aseahawkfan wrote:Do you expect the defense to turn around? They were 28th yards allowed. 31st passing. And we all watched the terrible Time of possession as they were pushed around the field. Do you see some reason for a different expectation this year on defense? What are you thinking? Darryl Taylor suddenly blows up? Mafe is better out of the gate than usual draft picks? We didn't make any great ready to to free agent moves. So we're operating with a rookie O-line and our defense from last year absent Bobby. I'm not sure that's an upgrade to the overall defense even if Brooks can somewhat match HoFer Bobby's output at some point.
Stream Hawk wrote:Maybe it was the New Orleans game. My bad, I just felt like he looked lost out there in all games except for Jacksonville.
Stream Hawk wrote:At least you have faith! I see a burgeoning team and QB is one of the last pieces. Geno is not the final answer, at least not a SB-caliber QB.
Also, I'm disgusted by his DUI and horrific behavior during the arrest. A QB is a team leader, that was a pathetic display of immaturity. At least Drew Lock doesn't seem to have that behavior in him.
Plus I hear there are still murmurs of Baker.
Stream Hawk wrote:At least you have faith! I see a burgeoning team and QB is one of the last pieces. Geno is not the final answer, at least not a SB-caliber QB.
Also, I'm disgusted by his DUI and horrific behavior during the arrest. A QB is a team leader, that was a pathetic display of immaturity. At least Drew Lock doesn't seem to have that behavior in him.
Plus I hear there are still murmurs of Baker.
Hawktawk wrote:As for Baker I saw some film of his pervert replacement throwing a pick in shorts and tee shirts, missing passes . If I’m the browns I’d be hanging on to Mayfield . Regardless I’m going to trust Pete like I did in 2012 when he picked a runt of the litter over a 20 million dollar signee. He will choose the right guy to win now . Pete freakin Carroll ain’t trading Wilson at 70 to start all over . This year is where dominating a power 5 conference for most of a decade is gonna really help . We’re beating Denver and then we will see what’s up .
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 67 guests