Distant Relative wrote:No way the Hawks brought this kid in to be a starting QB on this team. They may have brought him in on a 1 year guaranteed contract with a promise to him that they would polish him next season to be a formidable QB for another team. Another thought is.... that PC talked him into exploring other positions. Just a thought here but imagine TP , a 6' 6" WR with 4.3 speed stretching the field along with Harvin, Baldwin and Rice not to mention Miller peeling off of blocks to get in the empty middle of the field while the backs are trying to chase down the Hawks speedsters.
I'm done trying to figure out this coaching regime. I tip my cap to them, trust and respect them until I'm given reason not to, after all they built the first ever Seahawks Super Bowl Champions team!
Anthony wrote:from another board
"Sign TP to a cheap, long term deal. Lock up Earl & Sherm long term. TP has 2 years to learn behind RW. When contract time comes, the Jags or Texans or somebody offers RW $25 mill per season and TP takes over in SEA. "
and another board
"If you doubt my reasoning for acquiring Pryor, I suggest you think it through carefully. The reason PC/JS won a Super Bowl is because they put together a complete team that can win even when the QB passes for 48 yards and one miracle up-for-grabs completion. With Pryor, we now have one with enough perceived potential to keep fans from outright rioting"
There are people out there who really think Pryor or another QB we have can do it.
RiverDog wrote:Anthony wrote:from another board
"Sign TP to a cheap, long term deal. Lock up Earl & Sherm long term. TP has 2 years to learn behind RW. When contract time comes, the Jags or Texans or somebody offers RW $25 mill per season and TP takes over in SEA. "
and another board
"If you doubt my reasoning for acquiring Pryor, I suggest you think it through carefully. The reason PC/JS won a Super Bowl is because they put together a complete team that can win even when the QB passes for 48 yards and one miracle up-for-grabs completion. With Pryor, we now have one with enough perceived potential to keep fans from outright rioting"
There are people out there who really think Pryor or another QB we have can do it.
It would be out of character for RW to turn down a reasonable offer from the team that gave him his chance and prostitute himself to the highest bidder ala Alex Rodriguez. It's not going to happen.
kalibane wrote:Why do the assumptions of random people on a message board mean anything to you? This is the internet, where idiots run wild. There are also people in Washington who think they should trade RGIII and start Kirk Cousins. The fact that you can find other people who share an absurd idea doesn't make it any less absurd.
Anthony wrote:RiverDog wrote:Anthony wrote:from another board
"Sign TP to a cheap, long term deal. Lock up Earl & Sherm long term. TP has 2 years to learn behind RW. When contract time comes, the Jags or Texans or somebody offers RW $25 mill per season and TP takes over in SEA. "
and another board
"If you doubt my reasoning for acquiring Pryor, I suggest you think it through carefully. The reason PC/JS won a Super Bowl is because they put together a complete team that can win even when the QB passes for 48 yards and one miracle up-for-grabs completion. With Pryor, we now have one with enough perceived potential to keep fans from outright rioting"
There are people out there who really think Pryor or another QB we have can do it.
It would be out of character for RW to turn down a reasonable offer from the team that gave him his chance and prostitute himself to the highest bidder ala Alex Rodriguez. It's not going to happen.
I agree, but you are presuming he is made an offer, remember under these peoples assumptions, any mobile QB can do it, and Pryor would be cheaper than RW.
kalibane wrote:There are also people in Washington who think they should trade RGIII and start Kirk Cousins. The fact that you can find other people who share an absurd idea doesn't make it any less absurd.
RiverDog wrote:kalibane wrote:Why do the assumptions of random people on a message board mean anything to you? This is the internet, where idiots run wild. There are also people in Washington who think they should trade RGIII and start Kirk Cousins. The fact that you can find other people who share an absurd idea doesn't make it any less absurd.
And just to put an exclamation point on what Kal said, there were people in Denver that were outraged when the Broncos signed Peyton Manning and traded away Tim Tebow.
Hawktawk wrote:RiverDog wrote:kalibane wrote:Why do the assumptions of random people on a message board mean anything to you? This is the internet, where idiots run wild. There are also people in Washington who think they should trade RGIII and start Kirk Cousins. The fact that you can find other people who share an absurd idea doesn't make it any less absurd.
And just to put an exclamation point on what Kal said, there were people in Denver that were outraged when the Broncos signed Peyton Manning and traded away Tim Tebow.
Yeah I was one of them RD. #1 I thought Tebow got screwed being dumped off a successful season and a playoff win. #2 I felt Manning for all his flapping wings and chants of OMAHA is Mr October and prone to epic failure on the biggest stage. The Donkeys trajectory under Tebow will always be an unknown but Manning once again put up "star wars numbers" before flaming out dramatically both seasons. I was glad to see our team do the honors, he was who I thought he was. It isn't ever going to change for him at this stage of the game.
Zorn76 wrote:
Anthony - bro, please stop reading what people post at the Seattle Times board. It's the single worst forum, anywhere.
Hawktawk wrote:Denver's offense went from being ranked 23rd under Tebow in 2011 to #4 in 2012 and #1 and one of the most prolific ever in 2013 under Manning, so we can make some educated guesses.
In any event, I won't hold you to the Tebow thing. You stood by your beliefs in spite of overwhelming and at times very caustic opposition. I respect you for that.
Hawktawk wrote:Denver's offense went from being ranked 23rd under Tebow in 2011 to #4 in 2012 and #1 and one of the most prolific ever in 2013 under Manning, so we can make some educated guesses.
In any event, I won't hold you to the Tebow thing. You stood by your beliefs in spite of overwhelming and at times very caustic opposition. I respect you for that.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 39 guests