NorthHawk wrote:There's a big part of me hoping Carson hangs them up.
I'd hate to see him do more damage that would affect his life even more than the usual injuries football inflicts on players.
Regarding Penny, it's good it happened early and maybe with intensive treatment he can stay healthy but he's snake bit with injuries.
RiverDog wrote:I can't say that I'm surprised. Now you know why we've all had our reservations about Penny. This isn't the first time he's had problems with hamstring injuries. He missed a game last year due to a hamstring issue.
I'd say that the odds of him playing 1/2 or more of the season are about 5 to 1.
NorthHawk wrote:There's a big part of me hoping Carson hangs them up.
I'd hate to see him do more damage that would affect his life even more than the usual injuries football inflicts on players.
Regarding Penny, it's good it happened early and maybe with intensive treatment he can stay healthy but he's snake bit with injuries.
RiverDog wrote:I can't say that I'm surprised. Now you know why we've all had our reservations about Penny. This isn't the first time he's had problems with hamstring injuries. He missed a game last year due to a hamstring issue.
I'd say that the odds of him playing 1/2 or more of the season are about 5 to 1.
trents wrote:Do you mean to say that the odds of him playing or not playing 1/2 or more of the season are 5 to 1?
trents wrote:
Yes, there's plenty of time to recover from that hammy. We're not even in training camp yet. And Penny knows the playbook so he doesn't need the reps like if he were a rookie.
mykc14 wrote:Obviously there is more than enough time, that's not really the issue. The issue is that he is rarely healthy and this just looks bad. How could anybody have any real confidence that he is going to be healthy enough to make it through a full year of football when he hasn't done it yet and has trouble even making it to mini-camp? At the end of the day this could mean nothing and he is perfectly healthy next year, but it doesn't look good right now. I get that it is mini-camp and all of that and that overall it isn't important for him to be out here, but if he is getting hurt in the off-season, when he isn't being hit by 300lb guys 25 times a game then what is going to happen when the season starts? We have heard this tune before- we know how the song ends...
RiverDog wrote:Nice post. That's exactly how I see it. Perhaps it's just our coaching staff being overly cautious, maybe even likely that they are. But it highlights the danger of putting all our eggs in Penny's very precarious basket as some posters in here have insisted on doing.
Aseahawkfan wrote:I'm a big fan of a strong run game too. I don't look at is at Pete Ball myself. Pete's offensive philosophy is a classic defensive football mind set which works amazing if you have the right pieces. Doesn't work as well if you don't have a consistent run game and dominating defense.
I've no fan of the big passing attacks myself. I watched Dan Fouts back in the day launching passes because San Diego didn't have a complete team. That type of team may win a Super Bow here and there, but they are not consistent. Same as a great defensive and run team might win a Super Bowl with an average to maybe bad QB like Tampa Bay and Baltimore.
But the reality is the best teams are complete teams. Run, pass, and play defense with competent special teams.
I recall reading WCO was developed to move the ball with short passes when Walsh had a weak run game. The short passing game would use high percentage short passes to move the ball like a RB to keep the chains moving and avoid turnovers. When you combine that type of attack with a running game as well, it is obviously devastating. That being said it is not superior to the classic Pittsburgh type of play hard defense, run it down their throats, and throw deep off the play action pass game Pete likes to use. It's not Pete Ball, it's just a classic play action pass defensive football mind set that has been around the NFL for decades.
The only thing new in football is the soft rules. But even so, when it comes to the playoffs and push comes to shove the better defense can generally get a win. If we can build a strong defense with a good run game even if Penny, Walker, and Carson sharing time, then we can get something going maybe.
Hawktawk wrote:And North almost nobody stopped anything we were doing because of Penney.
RiverDog wrote:And North almost nobody stopped anything we were doing because of Penney.
Hawktawk wrote:Yeah a few things here . 11 carries with 10 to Dee Jay and 1 to Homer . Penney’s not getting half the carries in any game it the option is Dee Jay who averaged about 4 that evening . To be fair to Pete Penney had only had 1 huge game vs the Texans prior to that game so maybe he didn’t quite get it yet . If a guy has the ability to house it every play he gets 95% of the touches imo.
Old but Slow wrote:River, to be fair to Hawktalk, I think he meant that "he didn't get it yet" was referring to Pete, not Penny.
RiverDog wrote:I'm apparently not getting what you're trying to say. Are you saying that Penny isn't getting half the carries in any game? He had more carries than any other running back in all of our last 5 games, including the loss to the Rams.
I also don't understand you're comment that Penny "didn't quite get it yet". He's been with the team for 4 frigging years.
Why can't you just say that Penny had a bad game against the Rams? Why do you feel the urge to make excuses for his poor outings?
RiverDog wrote:I'm apparently not getting what you're trying to say. Are you saying that Penny isn't getting half the carries in any game? He had more carries than any other running back in all of our last 5 games, including the loss to the Rams.
I also don't understand you're comment that Penny "didn't quite get it yet". He's been with the team for 4 frigging years.
Why can't you just say that Penny had a bad game against the Rams? Why do you feel the urge to make excuses for his poor outings?
Aseahawkfan wrote:3 more months until we see what kind of team we really are. Hopefully not as bad as some of us think, but I'm fairly certain the pie in the sky scenario hawktawk paints is pretty far off too. We're in a tough division. We have a fairly tough schedule as well. And a lot of unknown at a lot of positions other than just QB. If we had other top flight units, maybe could do some Baltimore of Philly type of run with some real average to bad QB play. But we have questionable units at nearly every position except WR and punter. Even our LB crew will be Jordyn Brooks taking over for Bobby, then some up and comers. I'm confident Brooks is good enough to take over. Not so confident Diggs, Jamal Adams, Penny, and Carson all come back healthy. I think we'll be lucky to get one of them back fully healthy and I'm not sure which one.
I'm expecting a very inconsistent, down year with the usual people having injury issues and hopefully some progress from some of the draft picks. Main thing is to see the draft picks develop as that is the compensation for the loss of the franchise QB. If they don't develop, I think the heat is going to be very strong on Carroll and Schneider. But if we see positive development from the draft picks, then hope will be reborn.
RiverDog wrote:Yeah a few things here . 11 carries with 10 to Dee Jay and 1 to Homer . Penney’s not getting half the carries in any game it the option is Dee Jay who averaged about 4 that evening . To be fair to Pete Penney had only had 1 huge game vs the Texans prior to that game so maybe he didn’t quite get it yet . If a guy has the ability to house it every play he gets 95% of the touches imo.
I'm apparently not getting what you're trying to say. Are you saying that Penny isn't getting half the carries in any game? He had more carries than any other running back in all of our last 5 games, including the loss to the Rams.
I also don't understand you're comment that Penny "didn't quite get it yet". He's been with the team for 4 frigging years.
Why can't you just say that Penny had a bad game against the Rams? Why do you feel the urge to make excuses for his poor outings?
RiverDog wrote:
Why can't you just say that Penny had a bad game against the Rams? Why do you feel the urge to make excuses for his poor outings?
Hawktawk wrote:Penney had 11 carries mostly from the pistol since Russell’s healed hand didn’t take many snaps under center . Russ refused to run or really even carry out the fake. My point about Carrie’s you should understand and do but you like arguing with me is a bell cow back needs fed . Not a couple handoffs mixed with someone else . He had one more touch then Dee Jay . In his entire career Dee Jay wouldn’t do 1 time what I saw Penney do twice in 1 game which was beat a pro bowl safety with the angle to the end zone . He’d have started in 2018 if I was HC .
RiverDog wrote:I try to stay away from predictions this far out. The schedule doesn't look all that imposing. We have teams like the Lions and Jets, plus the NFC South is a pretty soft division with teams like the Panthers, Falcons, and Saints. We have the tendency to look at our team in a vacuum, not taking into consideration of the other teams around us that may have problems that exceed those of our own. The Cards have problems with their star QB. The Niners also have a quarterback controversy.
I have very little confidence that Penny will be able to stay healthy for more than half the season. To hear Hawktalk tell it, the only reason he missed any games was due to his major knee injury, but that's not true at all. He's missed games to hamstring pulls, calf muscle strains, knee strains. Even if he does manage to stay healthy, I'm not confident that he's finally 'found it'. The fact that we spent a 2nd day pick on a RB and resigned Penny to a one year prove it deal strongly suggests that Pete isn't that confident, either.
Aseahawkfan wrote:To me it isn't a prediction, it's just what's gonna happen. I expect a 6 to 9 win season. I guess we could sneak into the playoffs if enough teams are bad. No real contention in the playoffs. It will be the usual slow continued degradation and up and down years like we saw with Holmgren, Knox, and Carroll before Carroll finally retires or is let go and we move in another direction. To me we're at that point in the football cycle. I've seen it play out so many times over the years that it's a bit like the sun rising or gravity. Carroll kept us in a longer up period than usual, so it's been fun this time. And we finally got a Super Bowl, so that was cool. And not just any Super Bowl, but one of the most dominating Super Bowl victories in history. And we now get to brag about having one of the best defenses in history with a name like the Steel Curtain or The People Purple Eaters. So it's been a great 10 years. I'm sad we're on the downside now, but hey, it was gonna happen at some point.
I'm still gonna watch and see what happens like I always do even during the down years hoping for the best. I feel like we're in for a few years of the most exciting part of the Seahawks year being the draft.
I know you been watching long enough to know the periods I'm talking about and the football cycle.
But maybe we'll see Carroll pull off a 2nd coming. If any coach was gonna do it, it would be a coach like Carroll. So I do have some hope.
NorthHawk wrote:Russell went to 2 Super Bowls not throwing over the middle and had over 30 comeback wins doing the same.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 53 guests