RiverDog wrote:Looks like June 2nd could be the catalyst to getting Mayfield out of Cleveland. After June 1st his salary can be changed to a bonus and cap hit spread over multiple years. Like I have said many times before I am all for bringing Mayfield on as long as we aren't paying anywhere near to his full salary or giving up a day 1 or 2 draft pick, but a round 4 or 5 pick with a $9 million cap hit spread over the next two years would be OK with me.
That's a good scoop, mykc. My gut feeling is that if Pete were uncomfortable with his QB situation, that he would have drafted one as there were a number available that had dropped further than anyone had expected.
RiverDog wrote:That's a good scoop, mykc. My gut feeling is that if Pete were uncomfortable with his QB situation, that he would have drafted one as there were a number available that had dropped further than anyone had expected.
RiverDog wrote:That's a good scoop, mykc. My gut feeling is that if Pete were uncomfortable with his QB situation, that he would have drafted one as there were a number available that had dropped further than anyone had expected.
c_hawkbob wrote:I think Mayfield would already be a Seahawk if the Browns were willing to pay more of his salary. I'm reading that we are still in the mix for him if he either gets released or the Browns change their position. Schneider is playing this about right IMO.
I can't say I hope it happens but I would be more comfortable with him on the roster than I am now.
Hawktawk wrote:Why? He’s considered a bust in Cleveland , they could not unload him to anyone . He’s going to cost more than Geno and Locke put together plus a draft pick ? And you get a guy with Russel Wilson’s stature without the arm talent or wheels or football intelligence . Coupled with a terrible attitude . Listening to DK and Lockett they are pretty fired up with what’s going on right now and they would know . Shane Waldron repeated yesterday that Geno remains in the lead , picked up where he left off in 21 , very comfortable with the offense . He said Locke is fighting his tail off to catch up . He did say that they are in shorts and tennis shoes right now so there’s lots of time left to see who wins . Nowhere in his or Pete’s or JS comments do I get any indication they are adding any other veteran . Especially a guy who threw 17 TDs with OBJ and Jarvis Landry , nick Chubb in back of him
Not my choice at all.
NorthHawk wrote:This wasn’t a good draft for NFL ready QBs. Ther might be a couple that turn out to be good, but
it’s going to take them a while to develop.
Regarding Mayfield he’s a better QB than we have on our team, but he has to tone down his personality
if he wants to get his career back on track. I can see signing him to a short term deal that doesn’t
cost much, but with tha history of bad trades where we gave up top value for players that teams didn’t
think fit into their future plans it wouldn’t surprise me if we ended up giving far too much.
mykc14 wrote:Why? He’s considered a bust in Cleveland , they could not unload him to anyone . He’s going to cost more than Geno and Locke put together plus a draft pick ? And you get a guy with Russel Wilson’s stature without the arm talent or wheels or football intelligence . Coupled with a terrible attitude . Listening to DK and Lockett they are pretty fired up with what’s going on right now and they would know . Shane Waldron repeated yesterday that Geno remains in the lead , picked up where he left off in 21 , very comfortable with the offense . He said Locke is fighting his tail off to catch up . He did say that they are in shorts and tennis shoes right now so there’s lots of time left to see who wins . Nowhere in his or Pete’s or JS comments do I get any indication they are adding any other veteran . Especially a guy who threw 17 TDs with OBJ and Jarvis Landry , nick Chubb in back of him
Not my choice at all.
The Hawks are looking for the next QB who can take them to the SB. Anybody they can get on our roster who has more upside than what they already have is worth some sort of risk. Despite what you believe Geno to be Mayfield offers much more upside than him. He also has more upside than Lock. You love looking at small sample sized stats so much look at Mayfield's third year as a starter. He was on a nice trajectory and was supposedly hurt last year. I'm not saying he's definitely the man but I'd take him for a 4th and $9 million over both Geno and Lock, although I am intrigued by Lock. At the end of the day getting our QB that will take us to the SB is going to take time and risk- we went through Hass, Jackson, Whitehurst, and Flynn before RW. It's going to take the same sort of thinking this time. Continue to add QB's with more upside than you currently have.
Oly wrote:This probably isn't true, but it's what I hope is true and it fits with some public statements:
PCJS told Jodi Allen that they had a vision for a 2 year rebuild and she gave a soft guarantee that their jobs were safe until that played out.
Here's what I would have told her if I were PCJS:
--Year 1 is all about rebuilding the core of the team to carry out Pete's football philosophy. They would focus on establishing the run and limiting explosive pass plays when drafting and signing free agents. That certainly fits Pete's philosophy and the players they picked up. Don't get a QB and accept your lumps and hope for a high draft pick.
--Year 2: use the draft capital to get one of the elite QBs at the top of the draft. Fill holes as needed. Expect improvement but not a playoff run as the rookie QB learns the playbook and develops chemistry with the offense.
--Year 3: Expect a playoff run as the Year 1 core starts playing like pros and the QB has the rookie mistakes out of his system. If the team doesn't make the playoffs in this year, PC and/or JS are gone. But if they're back in the playoffs after a 2-year rebuild/reload/whatever, then they've earned as much more time as they want.
That's a very best-case scenario given the talent level of this team, IMO, but one that is plausible.
Now, back to Mayfield: he screws that whole thing up. Unless they think Mayfield is better than the QB prospects in the 2023 draft, he ruins everything. I don't think he's anywhere close to that good, so even if they sign him on the cheap, it would be a sign to me that PCJS don't have any plan at all or that they are the worst QB evaluators in the league. So while I share RiverDog's distrust of a single word that PC says, I think it's very, very possible he's telling the truth about being satisfied with the LockSmith "QB situation." I just think he's satisfied with the situation part of that phrase (i.e., that the plan is still in effect) rather than the QB part of that phrase (i.e., I think you can be happy with the situation but underwhelmed by the QBs).
NorthHawk wrote:What I can see happening with Mayfield is they see Lock and Geno up close
and panic then trade for Mayfield to help them win a few games or at least
give them a better chance to do so. But even then he wouldn’t be a long term answer
at QB IMO.
They saw Geno for 13 quarters and in OTAs hes "leading the charge" they dont sound panicked. Explain what would be wrong with a QB averaging 68.5 % and lighting up DK like a Christmas tree. Hes been throwing to DK and Rocket for 4 training camps now too.
I get it. You think it was a mirage. He will regress to 55% and a pick per TD right?. Id counter if that was his game these days he would have been long gone from the roster before he came in vs the Rams and went 98. QBs that go 98 cold vs a world champion defense dont panic me a bit. Unless I'm playing defense.
I dont care I want the win now guy. especially week 1
Hawktawk wrote:They saw Geno for 13 quarters and in OTAs hes "leading the charge" they dont sound panicked. Explain what would be wrong with a QB averaging 68.5 % and lighting up DK like a Christmas tree. Hes been throwing to DK and Rocket for 4 training camps now too.
I get it. You think it was a mirage. He will regress to 55% and a pick per TD right?. Id counter if that was his game these days he would have been long gone from the roster before he came in vs the Rams and went 98. QBs that go 98 cold vs a world champion defense dont panic me a bit. Unless I'm playing defense.
I dont care I want the win now guy. especially week 1
Hawktawk wrote:They saw Geno for 13 quarters and in OTAs hes "leading the charge" they dont sound panicked. Explain what would be wrong with a QB averaging 68.5 % and lighting up DK like a Christmas tree. Hes been throwing to DK and Rocket for 4 training camps now too.
I get it. You think it was a mirage. He will regress to 55% and a pick per TD right?. Id counter if that was his game these days he would have been long gone from the roster before he came in vs the Rams and went 98. QBs that go 98 cold vs a world champion defense dont panic me a bit. Unless I'm playing defense.
I dont care I want the win now guy. especially week 1
Aseahawkfan wrote:Geno went 1 and 2 in his 3 games. Sounds like a lose now guy to me. You keep focusing on those three games and keep forgetting we lost 2 of them, yet you keep painting it like we went 3-0 or something. We didn't. We went 1 and 2 with Geno who couldn't bring us back and close a game out, which is what really separates the starters from the backups.
trents wrote:Seahawks just released undrafted QB Levi Lewis. They now have an open roster spot. Is this a move to make room for Mayfield?
NorthHawk wrote: Explain what would be wrong with a QB averaging 68.5 % and lighting up DK like a Christmas tree. Hes been throwing to DK and Rocket for 4 training camps now too.
Obviously the coaching staff didn't think Geno is really that good because they took their time signing him and then to a short term deal.
They also wanted Lock to compete.
That says a lot just by those actions.
And we all want to win - that's a given but we also want to win in the long term, too and that doesn't include Geno as the starting QB over the next few years.
Hawktawk wrote:Obviously the coaching staff didn't think Geno is really that good because they took their time signing him and then to a short term deal. They also wanted Lock to compete. That says a lot just by those actions.
And we all want to win - that's a given but we also want to win in the long term, too and that doesn't include Geno as the starting QB over the next few years.
Hawktawk wrote:Once again you are completely 100% wrong about the circumstances of the Geno signing. Seattle intended to sign him from the beginning and had a contract on the table for some undetermined amount of time before Geno signed it. Pete made a public plea to Geno to "take advantage of this opportunity". Whatever the Hawkshack experts think Pete has praised Geno since his time starting, called his Jacksonville game "one of our best games of the year" Said he had been "prepared and ready to go" when Russ returned, had "played great" his last game.
Hawktawk wrote:Once again you are completely 100% wrong about the circumstances of the Geno signing. Seattle intended to sign him from the beginning and had a contract on the table for some undetermined amount of time before Geno signed it. Pete made a public plea to Geno to "take advantage of this opportunity". Whatever the Hawkshack experts think Pete has praised Geno since his time starting, called his Jacksonville game "one of our best games of the year" Said he had been "prepared and ready to go" when Russ returned, had "played great" his last game.
Waldron said hes still leading but were in tennis shoes and shorts. Of course Locke is expected to compete as is presumably Eason. Point is I was absolutely correct he played starter quality ball last year or we wouldn't be having the conversation.Id be delighted if hes anywhere near the same guy as last year and Locke beats him fair and square because were going to the super bowl if it happens.Not sure what long term means . Genos 2 years younger than Russ with a fraction of the mileage on his tires.
Geno played in 4 games. 10 points and a 98 yard drive vs the world champs in a quarter. First start in 5 years he led scoring drives on 4 of the last 5 drives of regulation despite 5 sacks , numerous hits and tipped balls by a defense that led the league in sacks behind TJ Watt. 72 % completion, 102 QBR completions to 10 receivers which I had to read twice I found that astounding for a guy making his first start in 5 years against that defense on the road in prime time. The only 2 minute drive I remember in a damn long time.
His worst game was vs the Saints in a downpour, 60% completion, 10 points but still a 65 yard laser to DK beating Lattimore. A couple of missed Meyers field goals ultimately sealed the loss to a defense that shut out the Goat a couple weeks later. Geno beat both Jalen Ramsey and Lattimore for TDs to DK in 13 quarters.
2 more touches to DK followed in the Jacksonville game"Ive never had a ball like that" the infamous quote by DK being covered by their best corner to anyone but geno haters, as his teammates congratulated him, ribbed with him. As Michelle Tafoya said prior to the Pittsburgh game" He is universally loved by his teammates" Well we can say not one of his former teammates in hindsight because Russels iron man stunt really hurt Geno and really hurt the team as well.
DK waited 6 games to catch another TD in the bears game Russ blew at the end, twice..After Geno hit him up for 17-21, 251 yards with 4 touches and a 151.5 QBR targeting our bell cow of bell cow receivers in 13 quarters. that is pushing 2 k yards and 20 TDs give or take in a season JUST TO DK.
Call him Elmer fudd. You dont like his face. I get it. He was terrible 5 years ago. But the first man not named Russ to take a snap in anger played damn fine football for the most part.
Explain how his numbers weren't starting #s? how his blowout win over the Jags where he completed 80% and Russ vs the bears and commanders where he lost to team with similar defensive struggles doesn't prove any given Sunday. Commanders surrender about 25 PPG vs Jags 26 PPG. Russ scored 13 with a pick on the 2 point.
And Asea is busted for referencing Russel's great Detroit game while mocking Genos Jags game. I dont play bad team good team in this field goal league where every team has freak athletes . Geno played starter quality for 13 quarters. Russ had a near perfect game vs detroit which is when I began to consider walking it all back but turns out it was just an audition for Denver.
If geno plays like the 13 quarters or someone plays like geno did for 13 quarters were winning 10 minimum with our improved by far defense and run game and competent on schedule QB play.
obiken wrote:I know this is a long thread, I am sorry, but another story came out today on SI. Report: Seahawks Would Sign Baker Mayfield If Browns Opt to Cut Him. River, Cob, ASHF, kinda kills the HT theory that the Hawks have a plan at qb doesnt it.
obiken wrote:I know this is a long thread, I am sorry, but another story came out today on SI. Report: Seahawks Would Sign Baker Mayfield If Browns Opt to Cut Him. River, Cob, ASHF, kinda kills the HT theory that the Hawks have a plan at qb doesnt it.
Hawktawk wrote:I would like to know how signing Mayfield if he’s released has anything to do with Seattle having no confidence in their current QBs . Based on my observations I’d trust Geno if he’s 2021 Geno . I’ve heard good reports about Lock picking up the offense and displaying his absolute cannon of an arm . But if any team in the league has a chance to get a #1 pick qb without surrendering compensation sad to tell you we won’t be the only team interested . B sides it’s been reported Watson could be facing at least a year suspension so mayfield might be going nowhere . I don’t care . I trust the guys who drafted and made Wilson a star that they can make the best choice to win in 2022.
They made a choice to rebuild in 2022 because they think they can win 3 years from now with the draft capital from that choice. They traded a franchise QB for an immense amount of draft capital that they will use to rebuild the team and compete hopefully by 2024. Not just log some wins, but rebuild a highly competitive team like when they first arrived developing some of these rooks from what appears to be a good draft class.
Some fans like yourself don't want to accept this is part of the choice they made, but I know what they did. I'll patiently watch to see if they rebuild magic again.
c_hawkbob wrote:The Browns expressing their willingness to absorb 50%+ of Bakers contract made him a viable possibility for Seattle again, even via trade (Pete's insistence that we won't trade for another QB notwithstanding).
NorthHawk wrote:I think it's as simple as Pete panics and then they make a bad trade. Adams is the shining example of that when we couldn't muster a pass rush and were on pace to be the worst ever NFL Defense.
What's he going to do when the Offense fails? I suspect he will again panic and pay far more than he should and mess up the rebuild for short term success.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 39 guests