NorthHawk wrote:No Offense matters except Pete Ball. It won’t matter if it’s Bill Walsh’s WCO or Air Coryell,
if it doesn’t follow Pete’s view it won’t be run in his Offense.
"Pete Ball" is not necessarily contrary to a Waldron run offense. Pete Carroll demands caution against high risk throws from his QB. His use of the "point guard" description is accurate...don't be the hero...put the ball in the hands of our play makers and trust the play called and the scheme being used to provide a quick read target.
If the QB sees/recognizes lazy coverage match-up then audibles out of a called play ...this can be realized as trust is gained. RW wasn't bombs away from the get go...he earned Pete's trust to audible out...but that trust wasn't earned over night. Respect between a QB and his head coach is dual edged with the hilt held by the coach. Waldron's schemes once fully implemented will be a wide stance...heavy on zone assignments for the O-line...and utilizing running/receiving options from similar alignments and motion.
Pete wants offensive balance to keep the chains moving with the run % based on opponent's revealed defensive game plan and its effectiveness. If the running game is "rolling" and allowing us to dictate field position then Waldron can customize on the fly.
Pete's strength and love has been defensive tilted and low risk distribution of offensive plays that keep time of possession friendly (chains moving) and prevent unnecessary turnovers from giving our defense the "short end" of the field is what he expects from the offense.
He is sharpening the defensive side of our team with recent hires/promotions to form a collective "school of thought" on achieving his goals of a smash mouth punishing defense. Draft selections on defense don't have to be wild guesses...Hitting Assassins with enough football IQ to avoid excessive penalties are highly sought after...if they have an interviewed/observed "chip on their shoulder" as well....then scouting "bells" start sounding.