tarlhawk wrote:Pete is hands on but not to the extent that he would smother Waldrons schemes...and Drew Lock is 6' 4" so the middle of the field on crossing patterns might become his forte...DK and Lockett are hard to contain with single coverage...and our current O-line was opening into zone blocks on opponents LB as our season closed so Penny might be the real deal. We don't have to sign an extension for DK and being so young his trade value won't "plummet" if we don't extend him under next years cap...or utilize the rare use of Franchise Tag in 2023. Its not URGENT that we trade DK...can Lock bond with a player who could elevate his skill sets??
tarlhawk wrote:Pete is hands on but not to the extent that he would smother Waldrons schemes...and Drew Lock is 6' 4" so the middle of the field on crossing patterns might become his forte...DK and Lockett are hard to contain with single coverage...and our current O-line was opening into zone blocks on opponents LB as our season closed so Penny might be the real deal. We don't have to sign an extension for DK and being so young his trade value won't "plummet" if we don't extend him under next years cap...or utilize the rare use of Franchise Tag in 2023. Its not URGENT that we trade DK...can Lock bond with a player who could elevate his skill sets??
Hawktawk wrote:Keep him . He was uncoverable with a pure junk shelf loser backup throwing to him . Whoever is behind center needs him .
Seattle needs him . Russ should have been traded a year ago when he turned up the volume on his whining and had his agent leak names of teams . I said so at the time and we would have been a year into the process . We already know DK was better with someone else throwing to him this year and happier too but we would really really know.
That’s the mistake John and Pete made , trying to appease Russ one more year . Russ is gone now for less than he’d have brought a year ago . Don’t unilaterally disarm and tell us you’re not rebuilding . There’s one DK in the league .
In other news Noah Fant had kind words for Locke “ his arm is his biggest attribute . I’ve seen some insane throws “. He thinks the potential is there. Interesting he’s caught more balls from Locke as a pro than anyone else has .
TriCitySam wrote:I agree with those who could go either way. Meaning, I love DK and if we can keep him and it's not insane (I don't think you build around a WR), then that's good. But looking at what kind of production we would likely get in our scheme it becomes a question of whether you can replace that production at a cheaper price. If we're only counting on 1,000 yards or so, then maybe be a good trade is in order.
NorthHawk wrote:That's pretty much Pete's Offense though. Run then throw deep. Every team knows that's what we are going to do because it hasn't changed
for over 10 years with the exception of early 2020 when Russ and Schotty were able to let loose. We had to do it because the Defense stunk to
high heaven but when it went off the rails for 2 games, Pete pulled back the reins and we went back to the same old, same old.
NorthHawk wrote:It’s the basically the same style of Offense he had at USC with Palmer and Sanchez, etc.
NorthHawk wrote:Sure, Pete’s Offense has that as part of it. Chunk throws I think is what he called it.
So as his confidence in Wilson grew, he allowed more deep throws. But everyone
knew it was coming because the offense barely changed. Same formations same
plays and no imagination.
c_hawkbob wrote:He's talking, again, about that one game Geno had in which he was so successful throwing to DK, and being facetious about describing Geno the way you do (to his mind).
RiverDog wrote:Keep him . He was uncoverable with a pure junk shelf loser backup throwing to him . Whoever is behind center needs him .
Seattle needs him . Russ should have been traded a year ago when he turned up the volume on his whining and had his agent leak names of teams . I said so at the time and we would have been a year into the process . We already know DK was better with someone else throwing to him this year and happier too but we would really really know.
That’s the mistake John and Pete made , trying to appease Russ one more year . Russ is gone now for less than he’d have brought a year ago . Don’t unilaterally disarm and tell us you’re not rebuilding . There’s one DK in the league .
In other news Noah Fant had kind words for Locke “ his arm is his biggest attribute . I’ve seen some insane throws “. He thinks the potential is there. Interesting he’s caught more balls from Locke as a pro than anyone else has .
Hawktawk wrote:Did you watch the games? Russ had pretty much given up on targeting tightly guarded receivers preferring the out sideline routes and deep shots where his guy gets it or nobody. As a scout said "risk averse with a great deep ball". By comparison Matthew Stafford led the league in picks and pick 6 s.
Geno had no problems finding DK nor would anyone else and if you've seen Locke throw a ball he can throw it about 70 yards. Any NFL QB can throw it to DK and Lockett, part of what POs me about Russell claiming he didnt have any help. Watch the games.
DK was wide open a lot.
NorthHawk wrote:Risk averse describes Pete Ball pretty accurately.
RiverDog wrote:Did you watch the games? Russ had pretty much given up on targeting tightly guarded receivers preferring the out sideline routes and deep shots where his guy gets it or nobody. As a scout said "risk averse with a great deep ball". By comparison Matthew Stafford led the league in picks and pick 6 s.
Geno had no problems finding DK nor would anyone else and if you've seen Locke throw a ball he can throw it about 70 yards. Any NFL QB can throw it to DK and Lockett, part of what POs me about Russell claiming he didnt have any help. Watch the games.
DK was wide open a lot.
Of course, I watched the games. Are you being sarcastic?
You were putting your usual overblown spin on your latest Flavor of the Day by saying that Metcalf was uncoverable, to which I called BS and showed you several examples to prove that he wasn't. You replied by using your usual, cherry picked small sample of Geno's playing time that not a single poster in here is buying.
So yeah, watch the games. All 17 of them. Good advice, you shoul try taking it.
Hawktawk wrote:I watched all of them twice . You should try it . If 17 for 21 for 251 yards and 4 TD s and a QBR of 151 targeting Metcalf over 13 quarters is overblown I’m all for over blown.
Once again you just don’t even get what I am so correct in pointing out . DK went off with someone not named Russ then was shut out for 7 weeks when he came back .
I saw Russ miss seeing him wide open including a certain TD vs the Rams , refuse to throw him balls in tight coverage “ nfl open “ windows . Genos cherry picked 13 quarters who you think sucked would extrapolate to about 1500 yards and 20. TD s to DK alone . If nobody on the board is buying it that’s their blinders on . Facts STATS don’t support your argument . Carroll buys it . But the people who want guys to trade their home run for picks but say they can’t pick correctly , yeah that’s logical
The scout is describing Russell’s game , not the scheme . At the conclusion of the second Rams game Russ had attempted 29 passes into the short middle of the field all season . Brady throws 7 balls a game there . Another scout says “ film doesn’t match the stats . Pete ball won a super bowl and would have won 2 but Russ burnt the dessert cooking . I’m fine with Pete ball . I want super bowls
Hawktawk wrote:The scout is describing Russell’s game , not the scheme . At the conclusion of the second Rams game Russ had attempted 29 passes into the short middle of the field all season . Brady throws 7 balls a game there . Another scout says “ film doesn’t match the stats . Pete ball won a super bowl and would have won 2 but Russ burnt the dessert cooking . I’m fine with Pete ball . I want super bowls .
Aseahawkfan wrote:
If you liked Super Bowls, you wouldn't support the garbage roster management and maintenance that have led us into the gutter we're in now which Russell had nothing to do with. It was all Pete and John making stupid trades and drafting people that did not work out.
I'm glad you seem to overlook this team wasn't winning Super Bowls or even competing for them until who arrived....Russell Wilson. It wasn't Pete Ball that won the games. It was having a complete team built around an elite QB that finally took us to the next level for the greatest Seahawks football ever, which Russell Wilson was a huge part of. He was in fact the difference maker. Without Russell we don't even get to a Super Bowl, much less two of them.
You keep trying to blame him for that stupid play call. Fact is he shouldn't even have put in position to have to throw into that rubbish situation. We had Russ and we had Beast. Basically the best read-option running QB in the game and the most brutal RB. Somehow clever Bevell thought throwing into the middle of a stacked goal line defense was a better play than the read option and Pete signed off on that play.
You don't get to pretend Russell wasn't the factor that made us going to the Super Bowl possible. You don't get to fabricate that trash. What was our record before Russell arrived playing Pete Ball? I'll tell you...two years of 7 and 9. Then what? We draft an under-sized QB that the league thinks sucks but Pete and John believe in. Then what is our record? 11-5, 13-3 (tied for our best record ever), and 12-4 (never had back to back seasons like this in our history) and two Super Bowl visits and one win.
So what was the difference? Pete Ball and Pete's coaching? Or the stud QB who made the offense sing? I know what I think it is. I know what's going to be proven next year when you watch Pete Ball without Russell Wilson.
But not sure why you're trying to push a bunch of rubbish when we all know that what took this team to to the next level was drafting the best QB in franchise history which led to the best Seattle football in franchise history as we had the best team we've ever had. If not for Russell, we wouldn't even have sniffed a Super Bowl. Would have been years of wasting the best defense we ever fielded as well as one of the hardest running RBs ever to put on a Seattle uniform.
I doubt we'll ever see a team that good in Seattle. Pete and John have sent nearly every member of that amazing Super Bowl team out in a way that makes them feel jilted and mistreated including Bobby Wagner who never did a thing to deserve being treated like he was treated.
NorthHawk wrote:In Seattle Wilson had 24 4th Quarter comeback wins and 32 game winning drives along with
4 Post season comeback game winning drives.
There are only a few other QBs who could have done that and I seriously doubt any QB that
has been on our roster during the PC/JS regime could have come close. Did some of his comeback attempts fail?
Of course, and he had some bad games too but he was far more successful than not.
And our HC couldn’t adjust to todays game to keep him.
Pretty pathetic.
NorthHawk wrote:They still have to figure out how they are going to get him the ball.
It may end up he’ll be wasting his talents in a moribund Offense
with a bad QB at the helm.
NorthHawk wrote:In Seattle Wilson had 24 4th Quarter comeback wins and 32 game winning drives along with
4 Post season comeback game winning drives.
There are only a few other QBs who could have done that and I seriously doubt any QB that
has been on our roster during the PC/JS regime could have come close. Did some of his comeback attempts fail?
Of course, and he had some bad games too but he was far more successful than not.
And our HC couldn’t adjust to todays game to keep him.
Pretty pathetic.
obiken wrote:YUP! This year with the Broncos there are going to be a lot of Hawk fans munching on Crow!
obiken wrote:YUP! This year with the Broncos there are going to be a lot of Hawk fans munching on Crow!
Hawktawk wrote:Are you rooting for Russell over the Seahawks ? You want this to fail so you can win your argument ? Russ might get smashed when he comes back to Lumen. I hope he goes 0-17 and gets cut .
obiken wrote:YUP! This year with the Broncos there are going to be a lot of Hawk fans munching on Crow!
Hawktawk wrote:Are you rooting for Russell over the Seahawks ? You want this to fail so you can win your argument ? Russ might get smashed when he comes back to Lumen. I hope he goes 0-17 and gets cut .
c_hawkbob wrote:Oh come on, so now anybody that doesn't share your delusion is anti-Hawks?
Russ didn't steal my lunch money, I wish him nothing but the best (when he's not playing the Hawks), and I think he's going to kill it in Denver.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 52 guests