https://twitter.com/Schultz_Report/stat ... _&ref_url=
Hawktalk, don't throw out your back as you're spinning cartwheels!

govandals wrote:Wow, so $4 mil base pay and $3 mil in incentives. I don't get this one at all. Should've been offered a vet minimum deal and let him walk if he didn't take it. Who else is gonna sign him? I'd rather put the $4 mil toward a starting LT or RT.
govandals wrote:Wow, so $4 mil base pay and $3 mil in incentives. I don't get this one at all. Should've been offered a vet minimum deal and let him walk if he didn't take it. Who else is gonna sign him? I'd rather put the $4 mil toward a starting LT or RT.
mykc14 wrote:Yeah, I don't like giving Geno $4 mil, I would rather see what Lock has at this point. Geno at a veteran minimum makes sense because you lose nothing if he isn't much better than Lock, but Geno starting moves us to mediocracy, which is exactly where we don't want to be and giving him. Geno reminds me of T-Jack best case scenario is maybe a WC berth, but in reality it moves us to mediocracy. Lock is much more of an unknown- If Lock sucks then you get a good pick next year, which lots of ammo to move around and draft the guy you want, if he is mediocre then you didn't waste $4 mil to be exactly where you would have been with Geno anyway, and if he is good then maybe you have a guy you can build around.
Stream Hawk wrote:Pathetic. I am back to not trusting or believing Carroll’s direction. Foresee a lot of mediocrity in this team’s future. Hope I’m proven drastically wrong. They better draft a stud qb, and it also better not be at pick 9.
RiverDog wrote:Holy cow, you guys! Have some sympathy for our friend Hawktalk! When he finally checks in and reads some of our comments about the Geno signing, he's going to do a header off the top of the Space Needle.
RiverDog wrote:Holy cow, you guys! Have some sympathy for our friend Hawktalk! When he finally checks in and reads some of our comments about the Geno signing, he's going to do a header off the top of the Space Needle.
Stream Hawk wrote:Pathetic. I am back to not trusting or believing Carroll’s direction. Foresee a lot of mediocrity in this team’s future. Hope I’m proven drastically wrong. They better draft a stud qb, and it also better not be at pick 9.
Agent 86 wrote:
Lol, I will jump in and give this move some love then. It's not the best combo of QB's to head into training camp but about a month ago I did state that my belief was it would be Lock and Geno competing for the starting job and Seahawks fans would lose their minds over it. So I will give myself a mini pat on the back for that.
I am always optimistic, I said in other thread the will and character of a pro athlete are not to be underestimated especially given these circumstances where most will write them off. I am not super confident either one will grab hold of the job and succeed but I am willing to give em a chance. I am super curious to see how this offence can be run with more of a methodical approach under Waldron's system rather than the "playground" offense we had with RW3 that relied on off script big plays (I know that is a bit of exaggeration).
Agent 86 wrote:Lol, I will jump in and give this move some love then. It's not the best combo of QB's to head into training camp but about a month ago I did state that my belief was it would be Lock and Geno competing for the starting job and Seahawks fans would lose their minds over it. So I will give myself a mini pat on the back for that.
Hawktawk wrote:4 TDs 251 yards 17 out of 21 with a 151 QBR targeting to DK. Completed 68.5 % of his passes for 700 yards. No picks starting. 131 passing yards, 23 rushing yards and 10 points in the 4th quarter including a 98 yards drive vs the Rams cold off the bench. In his final game he set the 2021 season record besting Arod with 15 completions to open the game in a 20 of 24 performance, 80% completion, 138 QBR in a 31-7 win the week before the heroic Russel forced his way back on the field to help the desperate team only to be shut out by GB and lose his first 3 back..
What's pathetic about Genos play especially comparing it to the 35 million man last year? Is it his looks? off field issues? prior record? hes been with Seattle 3 years now. What is everyone's beef with Geno?
govandals wrote:Wow, so $4 mil base pay and $3 mil in incentives. I don't get this one at all. Should've been offered a vet minimum deal and let him walk if he didn't take it. Who else is gonna sign him? I'd rather put the $4 mil toward a starting LT or RT.
Hawktawk wrote:4 TDs 251 yards 17 out of 21 with a 151 QBR targeting to DK. Completed 68.5 % of his passes for 700 yards. No picks starting. 131 passing yards, 23 rushing yards and 10 points in the 4th quarter including a 98 yards drive vs the Rams cold off the bench. In his final game he set the 2021 season record besting Arod with 15 completions to open the game in a 20 of 24 performance, 80% completion, 138 QBR in a 31-7 win the week before the heroic Russel forced his way back on the field to help the desperate team only to be shut out by GB and lose his first 3 back..
What's pathetic about Genos play especially comparing it to the 35 million man last year? Is it his looks? off field issues? prior record? hes been with Seattle 3 years now. What is everyone's beef with Geno?
Stream Hawk wrote:I stand by my concern. You are referring to one game. Against the worst team in the league led by s*** show, soon to be fired coach. Let the Jacksonville game go please. He was otherwise garbage.
I am very concerned with the direction of this team. Pete is not trying to rebuild; he thinks he’s got what it takes now. Pathetic. I may becoming Obiken, but am literally so frustrated with the mediocrity potential of this franchise.
Stream Hawk wrote:4 TDs 251 yards 17 out of 21 with a 151 QBR targeting to DK. Completed 68.5 % of his passes for 700 yards. No picks starting. 131 passing yards, 23 rushing yards and 10 points in the 4th quarter including a 98 yards drive vs the Rams cold off the bench. In his final game he set the 2021 season record besting Arod with 15 completions to open the game in a 20 of 24 performance, 80% completion, 138 QBR in a 31-7 win the week before the heroic Russel forced his way back on the field to help the desperate team only to be shut out by GB and lose his first 3 back..
What's pathetic about Genos play especially comparing it to the 35 million man last year? Is it his looks? off field issues? prior record? hes been with Seattle 3 years now. What is everyone's beef with Geno?
I stand by my concern. You are referring to one game. Against the worst team in the league led by s*** show, soon to be fired coach. Let the Jacksonville game go please. He was otherwise garbage.
I am very concerned with the direction of this team. Pete is not trying to rebuild; he thinks he’s got what it takes now. Pathetic. I may becoming Obiken, but am literally so frustrated with the mediocrity potential of this franchise.
RiverDog wrote:Lol, I will jump in and give this move some love then. It's not the best combo of QB's to head into training camp but about a month ago I did state that my belief was it would be Lock and Geno competing for the starting job and Seahawks fans would lose their minds over it. So I will give myself a mini pat on the back for that.
It needs to be awfully mini as our roster is far from set. We're only going to keep two QB's on the 53 man roster, so if Pete spends his #9 overall on a QB, or even one of his two #2's, he's not going to cut them when the season starts. That means that either Lock or Geno will get their walking papers. As a matter of fact, that could explain the unusually high $4M for Geno, that Pete plans on cutting him anyway and simply wants him there as training camp fodder. After all, we don't have anyone on the roster with any kind of experience in our offense, so there's a huge need for Geno to be in camp when those other guys hit the field.
Better wait until around Labor Day before anyone breaks into their touchdown dance.
Sounds more like wishing to me River . Sounds ridiculous the team would pay 3 times last years salary for camp fodder . And I rather doubt we’re trading Wilson for Locke then cutting him as he is a big piece of the trade capital and still has great potential . The only scenario I could see Geno off the roster is if they draft a QB late and he’s the next Wilson . Genos on the team . Deal with it hawks nation
tarlhawk wrote:An excellent signing despite some of the sentiments shared by some of these posts...especially those of you who criticize every move done by the team's Front Office. I am glad our GM and Head Coach are calling the shots and not those fans who act like "know-it-alls" and very condescending to those of us who insist on a glass "half-full".
Hawktawk wrote:Sounds more like wishing to me River . Sounds ridiculous the team would pay 3 times last years salary for camp fodder . And I rather doubt we’re trading Wilson for Locke then cutting him as he is a big piece of the trade capital and still has great potential . The only scenario I could see Geno off the roster is if they draft a QB late and he’s the next Wilson . Genos on the team . Deal with it hawks nation
NorthHawk wrote:I doubt we could afford Mayfield now unless the Browns eat almost all of his contract value. And I doubt they do that.
RiverDog wrote:
Did you see how much of Geno's contract is guaranteed? I didn't. What happens if we bring in Mayfield, keep Lock, and cut Geno? Honest question.
Hawktawk wrote:How does everyone know we were bidding against ourselves with Geno or any of these guys ? Was he just willing and financially able to say screw you im just not playing for that amount . JS approved it and PC publicly says Genos ahead of everyone right now . Doesn’t sound like camp fodder to me . Could someone wind up on the practice squad ?
Did you see how much of Geno's contract is guaranteed? I didn't. What happens if we bring in Mayfield, keep Lock, and cut Geno? Honest question.
Hawktawk wrote:Get out your Pom poms RD . You’re hoping for it
The entire league has had weeks to snap up Mayfield and nobody’s biting. The only
one who has said he is coming here is him. He also said in a podcast he would love to break into someone’s cubicle and boo them and watch them crumble . He’s running his mouth about Cleveland disrespecting him after he originally said he wanted out . It’s making Wilson’s exit look clean
So OK honest question. You have 3 guys . Locke is signed not sure his number but young stud , big guy 6’4” huge arm . He came with a tight end hes completed 72 passes to . JS loved the guy in the draft .
Then there is Geno .if he gets to the postseason or something he’s costing 7 mil max . He ran the team efficiently to exceptionally in most of his audition and I had zero positive vibes or expectations when he walked on the field . 98 yard drive later I was a believer .
And an interesting thing is he’s not got a lot of tread off the tires for 31 . Not hit too much .6’3”1/2, big powerful accurate arm . Incredible rapport with our star receivers Lockett and DK
Then you have a disgruntled runt , a white Russell Wilson without the arm or the wheels . Maybe more steel but that’s it . For 19 million .
Fair question what to do in that scenario .
To me its all about the upside of Lock vs. Geno and the known of Geno vs. Lock. I don't think Geno is a guy who can win us a SB (obviously I could be wrong about this and would love it if I were). I actually think Geno is a guy who takes us farther away from a SB because he moves us towards mediocracy. I think Geno's ceiling is getting us to Wildcard weekend while his floor is probably around 6 or 7 wins. Lock's floor is lower, IMO. I think his floor is getting us a top 5 pick while his ceiling is unknown. That's what I don't like about this move. In my opinion it moves us to mediocracy which is exactly where I don't want to be next year. I would love if Geno or Lock took us to the SB next year but the reality is there is close to a 0% chance of that happening. I want us to commit to the rebuild and guaranteeing Geno $4 mil doesn't do that IMO. That $4 mil could be pushed to next year to help off-set Adams cap hit. Right now he is going to count 18 mil against the cap, I would rather him count 14 mil next year. Then if he continues to play the way he did last year we can cut him and save $7 million the year after. I don't want us spending a dime on anybody if they aren't going to get us closer to a SB and Geno doesn't do that, IMO.
c_hawkbob wrote:Right. Just like when we signed Matt Flynn to a $20M contract in '12.
Hawktawk wrote:There probably isn’t a Geno jersey.might never be. But Pete and john believe in Geno after his performance. You have all been wrong evaluating his performance in relief. I just watch film and the guy played solid .
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 53 guests