Hawktawk wrote:Sherman’s wife told the police he had consumed 2 fifths of Jamison. That’s 36 units unless she’s lying.
Hawktawk wrote:Good lord man I’ve read all the police reports . DUI is bad alway . Dangerous . Talking crap to cops and making threats is worse . Crashing and driving off on 3 wheels , menacing your family and actually fighting with cops is worse. Driving 156 in a 45 zone and killing someone still worse yet . The only comparison with Geno and those 2 is all were drinking and driving . You are splitting hairs to support an argument based on your Geno Bias . And I read the quotes from the judge about what Sherman has done in the community , pillar of the community .
Having been in the legal system for DUI I’m aware of sentencing guidelines . Extreme DUI is 2 to 365 days . What is hit and run ? Scuffling with cop. Attempted break in as his father in law was armed. And what was his penalty ? I’m guessing average guy is getting a couple months . I certainly don’t think he got that or much time at all. I’m done with the discussion .
If all you do is bend a stop sign and it didn't involve private property, you're not likely to be charged.
If all you do is bend a stop sign and it didn't involve private property, you're not likely to be charged.
c_hawkbob wrote:Single car rollover in a winding canyon road (on the way to work in Utah), no damage to anything but my car, and I was charged with leaving the scene of an accident with more than $500 damage. Might be a state by state thing, but damage to public or someone else's property isn't the threshold for charges in my experience.
tarlhawk wrote:I feel like we are looking for a QB to fairly compete with Drew Lock...hence the talk of bringing back Geno Smith and another mystery vet QB ...2nd/3rd Rd QB drafted. Baker would command too much cap room...we seem to be resolved to exploiting the luxury of having a rookie QB under contract as we restock our talent base.
c_hawkbob wrote:If we get past day two without having drafted a QB I still think we may look at Baker. And I think the same can be said of a few teams.
NorthHawk wrote:At that point the Browns might be more enthused about getting rid of him, too but the investigation into Watson may mean a suspension for him by the NFL. They
might be in a jam at the start of the season.
I think we're going to draft a QB at some point this year and maybe in the middle rounds instead of the 7th or UFA.
Hawktawk wrote:Why are you sure we will start camp with such a “ $h1tty situation “ at QB? If it’s Geno I have all the confidence in the world assuming he’s got Uber or an interlock device. Relatively short sample but HT thinks we would improve on this years record significantly if he played like he did in his 13 quarters . He’s 6.3.5 and used the entire field with an accurate powereful arm
Mobile enough . Beloved by teammates.
Hawktawk wrote:I’m fascinated by Locke and also the fact that Fant has caught 70 plus balls from him
, more than any other Denver Receiver. He says Drew’s arm is his biggest attribute . Said he’s seen some “ insane “ throws Having watched some film I will say he has one of the most high velocity spirals I’ve ever seen . He’s mobile , 6’4”.
I’m gonna trust Pete and John . I have no choice but I have a better sense of optimism about next year than I did about this one because I already knew the QB situation was a mess with a guy who wanted out . PC and JS might just have one hell of an Okeydoke for Denver and their doubters up their sleeve .
RiverDog wrote:
Did I read you right, that you feel that our "QB mess" was worse last season than it is now?
NorthHawk wrote:Russ played Pete Ball to a tee. He was the perfect fit for it but it becomes less interesting over time doing the same things over and over.
Hawktawk wrote:]Russ played Pete Ball to a tee. He was the perfect fit for it but it becomes less interesting over time doing the same things over and over.
\Early in his career yes . Later no. And think about what you are arguing . He’s the PERFECT FIT FOR PETE BALL which got to 2 superbowls but he doesn’t want to play it . Coach knew best . Still does .
Hawktawk wrote:And regarding the OP mayfield told reporters he believes Seattle is his next destination. True or not it seems like quite a party foul for the soeculee to be out in front of his skis like that . I’ve come to hope it doesn’t happen .
Hawktawk wrote:And regarding the OP mayfield told reporters he believes Seattle is his next destination. True or not it seems like quite a party foul for the soeculee to be out in front of his skis like that . I’ve come to hope it doesn’t happen .
RiverDog wrote:It would appear that the Browns and Mayfield are going to have to wait until after the draft before a team comes forward, if one ever does. If a QB hungry team, which includes the Hawks, comes away from the draft w/o a quarterback, then they may be more willing to cut a deal. There's also the possibility that the Browns hold onto him, although at this point, both sides have pretty much burned the bridges.
RiverDog wrote:It would appear that the Browns and Mayfield are going to have to wait until after the draft before a team comes forward, if one ever does. If a QB hungry team, which includes the Hawks, comes away from the draft w/o a quarterback, then they may be more willing to cut a deal.
There's also the possibility that the Browns hold onto him, although at this point, both sides have pretty much burned the bridges.
c_hawkbob wrote:I've already said I think it'll be after the second day of the draft we'll go after him if we haven't drafted a QB.
Aseahawkfan wrote:Derek Carr just received a 12o million 3 year extension? Sheesh. QB pay seems to be out of control.
I hope we don't, but I'm afraid that you might be right, especially if Pete truly believes that we're not rebuilding. If we do, I hope that it's a low risk trade, like a 3rd day draft pick.
I hope we don't, but I'm afraid that you might be right, especially if Pete truly believes that we're not rebuilding. If we do, I hope that it's a low risk trade, like a 3rd day draft pick.
NorthHawk wrote:Didn’t Pete say we we “resetting” and not rebuilding back around 2018? It didn’t go very well then, so why should we think it will go well this time without a top QB?
Old but Slow wrote:With the sky rocketing money being thrown at QBs, teams may begin to adjust by deemphasizing the position. Smart money now seems to aim to go with a point guard/game manager type QB, keeping through his first contract and then rinse and repeat. Surround a middling quarterback with weapons (acquired because money has been saved at QB), and emphasize the running game.
Common wisdom says that you need a franchise QB to win a championship, and while that is often the case, exceptions exist, as a list of Supurb Owl winners will attest. Teams win, and no signal caller can carry a bad team to a title.
Watson, for example, may have some immediate success with the team that is already there, but soon those support players will need new contracts, and there will be no money to sign them. Then comes a team of retreads and wannabes.
Could happen. Or not.
Where did I say that I thought it would go well? I'm only saying that if Pete thinks we're not rebuilding, that he might make a move to get Mayfield.
NorthHawk wrote:Sorry, I meant it as a general rhetorical statement.
Aseahawkfan wrote:Derek Carr just received a 12o million 3 year extension? Sheesh. QB pay seems to be out of control.
Hawktawk wrote:Speaking of extensions I would think Denver and Russel would be working on something if this is what Carr is gonna make.
Old but Slow wrote:With the sky rocketing money being thrown at QBs, teams may begin to adjust by deemphasizing the position. Smart money now seems to aim to go with a point guard/game manager type QB, keeping through his first contract and then rinse and repeat. Surround a middling quarterback with weapons (acquired because money has been saved at QB), and emphasize the running game.
Common wisdom says that you need a franchise QB to win a championship, and while that is often the case, exceptions exist, as a list of Supurb Owl winners will attest. Teams win, and no signal caller can carry a bad team to a title.
Watson, for example, may have some immediate success with the team that is already there, but soon those support players will need new contracts, and there will be no money to sign them. Then comes a team of retreads and wannabes.
Could happen. Or not.
TriCitySam wrote:For the Broncos RW has a $24MM cap # this year and $27MM next - but that's his last year, and so will want the new contract next year. They'll get two years with him, but then it get expensive. So, he'll be 36 after that and cost a lot. So Denver better cash in in the next 2 years.
TriCitySam wrote:For the Broncos RW has a $24MM cap # this year and $27MM next - but that's his last year, and so will want the new contract next year. They'll get two years with him, but then it get expensive. So, he'll be 36 after that and cost a lot. So Denver better cash in in the next 2 years.
RiverDog wrote:Yup. Especially now that Watson signed for $50m/season and a wanna be like Derek Carr signed for an embarrassingly overpaid $40M. The more I see, the better I feel about the Wilson trade.
TriCitySam wrote:For the Broncos RW has a $24MM cap # this year and $27MM next - but that's his last year, and so will want the new contract next year. They'll get two years with him, but then it get expensive. So, he'll be 36 after that and cost a lot. So Denver better cash in in the next 2 years.
NorthHawk wrote:I read something yesterday that said the guaranteed money for Carr is only $25M over the life of the contract.
Regarding salaries I’ve heard/read a number of people talking about the Cap increasing by about 20% or to about
$240M or more in the next few years with the new TV/gambling/streaming contracts. So the QB salaries might
not be so bad but the fully guaranteed part really rocks the boat and may put other teams in a bind in negotiations.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 42 guests