HawkShack.com

http://www.hawkblogger.com/2014/04/battle-of-best-2013-seahawks-defense-vs.html

You're going to love this. Hawkblogger has done an AWESOME job putting this together. It may have been written by a Seahawks fan, but it stives to be devoid of any Seahawks bias, and ultimately shows that, when you factor in the different rules and eras, the Seahawks defense may have been BETTER than the fabulous Ravens defense.
He's got a ocmparison between the Seahawks and 85 Bears defenses coming up next.

Love it.

DATA FTW

Here is the comparison to the '85 Bears: http://www.hawkblogger.com/2014/04/batt ... vs_14.html

Judges Hawks better vs 2000 Ravens? HAWKBLOGGER'S A GENIUS!
Judges Hawks worse vs 1985 Bears? HAWKBLOGGER'S ON DOPE!

burrrton wrote:Judges Hawks better vs 2000 Ravens? HAWKBLOGGER'S A GENIUS!
Judges Hawks worse vs 1985 Bears? HAWKBLOGGER'S ON DOPE!

Yeah, obviously he's a phony Seahawks fan!
LOL!
Seriously though, Hawkblogger did some great work on this series. Big props to him!
It's hard to argue with him, given the ground rules he set up, and the equitable treatment of the statistics.

Seriously though, Hawkblogger did some great work on this series. Big props to him!

Agreed. It's obvious he's going where the data take him, whether he likes the outcome or not.

Yeah, I like the method and (because of that) the conclusions. I honestly had the same assessment based on the eyeball test -- '85 Bears > '13 Seahawks > '00 Ravens -- but Hawkblogger's analysis turns an opinion into an argument.