RiverDog wrote:I'm not that pissed. The season was an abortion anyway. As a matter of fact, if it results in Pete getting fired, then it might actually be a good thing, like the Vinny Testaverde helmet touchdown that got Erickson fired.
I-5 wrote:This is crazy to even think about, but what are the chances that Russ isn’t super bothered about losing (close) games in the chance that it helps seal his fate in Seattle - assuming he would really like to be somewhere else this time next year? I told you it was a crazy thought.
I-5 wrote:This is crazy to even think about, but what are the chances that Russ isn’t super bothered about losing (close) games in the chance that it helps seal his fate in Seattle - assuming he would really like to be somewhere else this time next year? I told you it was a crazy thought.
RiverDog wrote:
It would be very out of character, and I find it extremely hard to believe.
But I do think that something isn't right with Russell, and that the problem goes beyond his finger. He's making too many bad decisions that has nothing to do with his health or his coaching. He's making bad decisions, like run/pass, target selection, and although some errant throws might be attributed to his finger, his accuracy.
I-5 wrote:Yeah, I don’t for a moment think he would ever tank a game. That’s why I phrased it as ‘not bothered’, as in take your shot but don’t be too upset with making mistakes. Like you guys pointed out, there’s something that feels off. To me, it’s most evident when I hear him talk after yet another excruciating loss - you expect to see more disappointment. Now, I know he does preach not getting too high or too low, so maybe that’s all it is. But it still bothers me.
obiken wrote:The question River, is would we have been better off with Russ and a bad Finger, vs no Russ and the backup. I dont think it would have made any difference.
obiken wrote:The question River, is would we have been better off with Russ and a bad Finger, vs no Russ and the backup. I dont think it would have made any difference.
obiken wrote:The question River, is would we have been better off with Russ and a bad Finger, vs no Russ and the backup. I dont think it would have made any difference.
I-5 wrote:
Considering Russ couldn't put the ball where he wanted to, I'd say the backup.
Hawktawk wrote:He also couldn’t take snaps under center or hand off with his right hand for all of the first game . Against Arod in Green Bay PC put a guy who never won in the stadium and played horrible when he was there healthy who could not throw , take a snap or hand off at an NFL level . PC bowed at the altar of Russel Wilson and hoped for the impossible . And all the fans and other guys in that team paid for it .
Hawktawk wrote:He also couldn’t take snaps under center or hand off with his right hand for all of the first game . Against Arod in Green Bay PC put a guy who never won in the stadium and played horrible when he was there healthy who could not throw , take a snap or hand off at an NFL level . PC bowed at the altar of Russel Wilson and hoped for the impossible . And all the fans and other guys in that team paid for it .
I-5 wrote:To be fair, once Russ pronounced himself 'healed', it didn't leave Pete much choice. Even though he is the HC, Russ being the annointed once, if he says he's ready to go, no one is going to be able to stop him from playing. As someone else said (was it you HT?), Pete could have pulled him once it because obvious Russ wasn't able to get it done, but that's tricky, too. Bottom line, Russ' competitive spirit, hubris, ego - whatever we want to call it - took the team down a pretty impossible road, knowing he couldn't make the throws and that we had to cater the offense to his injury.
Hawktawk wrote: I give PC most of the blame for betraying his team to appease Russels very public docudrama . I blame Russ quite a bit for being a me first dishonest narcissist who knew he wasn’t himself but played anyway . I like team players and coaches with a spine .
tarlhawk wrote:Only my opinion but your written rhetoric comes down a bit over the top for claiming you're not infatuated with a healthy Gino being sent back to the bench too early...even if Pete (betrayal?) was hoping against hope to get RW back. A healthy (mentally and physically) Russell does give us a game changer. Gino played admirably well and will hopefully translate those efforts into a starting job...somewhere else.
Russell gave no real ammo for thinking his recovery was orchestrated for ulterior purposes. I think his mindset has always been to keep himself in shape and to not let an injury keep him from the team he hopes to help. Others (outsiders) have always marveled at his maintaining his own personal conditioning regimen with much of that reputation based on his shrugging off injury (ankle and MCL injuries in 2016).
More recently a couple years ago (not really sure) he faced concussion protocol and was sent to the "tent"...Gino came in for one snap...since RW went into the tent and came right back out putting his helmet back on and went back on field. Outside media might make it a drama like coverage but unless you think RW controls the media...there is nothing but speculation of him being me-first. I know of at least once offering/okaying the restructure of his contract to bring in someone...too lazy to find out who it was for ...but I remember Doug Baldwin also offered.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 45 guests