RiverDog wrote:Yeah, Hawktalk, good research.
I. too, have a lot of respect for Geno. He's always played well in preseason and didn't do anything last Thursday that would make one pause. I don't think for a minute that he's our QB of the future if we were to part ways with Russell, but he might be able to fill the gap until we get our next franchise QB. 6 weeks will be plenty of time to make a good evaluation of him in the event Russell does decide to move on.
Hawktawk wrote:What if he (Geno) runs the table or goes say 5-1 or something? On paper it couldn't come at a better time in the schedule. But say he does. Does that change the calculation about whether he's a good NFL starter? say its 8 weeks and he goes 6-2? What if he wins them all?
Hawktawk wrote:As for Russ short of a miracle comeback and a Lombardi Russ is gone no matter what else should happen.
RiverDog wrote:As for Russ short of a miracle comeback and a Lombardi Russ is gone no matter what else should happen.
Listening to Greg Olsen in the pregame last Thursday has led me to believe that there's a good chance that you're right. But you're not considering another possibility. Suppose Pete gets fired and they hire an offensive minded coach, say someone like Eric Bieniemy or Brian Daboll. Does Russell decide that he wants to stick around for the rebuild?
I-5 wrote:Thanks for doing that research on Geno, HT. I think he's not a typical backup based on his talent. He's definitely had his humbling moments, but he showed nothing but skill in a very tough spot on Thursday.
I'm not holding out for a realistic shot at the playoffs this year, but a couple things I'm really curious to see are 1) how Geno operates Waldron's system any differently than Russ (it's also possible Waldron is adjusting his playbook to fit Geno) and 2) how our protection will be with Geno due to his size, speed (or lack of), how quickly he gets rid of it, etc. It's almost like watching a control group in a scientific experiment. Ok maybe it's not as clinical as that, but you get the point...
Hawktawk wrote:Yeah RD you are correct . Smith is plenty mobile and contributed on the ground most starts . He’s much like Russ in that he prefers to pass but runs if he has to . I believe he had 27 yards rushing , over 100 passing and ten points and a pick in about 15 minutes of play . He’s got a big arm . His downside compared to Russ has always been accuracy and decision making . If he’s on he has the skills to do anything he needs to
RiverDog wrote:Yeah, Hawktalk, good research.
I. too, have a lot of respect for Geno. He's always played well in preseason and didn't do anything last Thursday that would make one pause. I don't think for a minute that he's our QB of the future if we were to part ways with Russell, but he might be able to fill the gap until we get our next franchise QB. 6 weeks will be plenty of time to make a good evaluation of him in the event Russell does decide to move on.
Hawktawk wrote:You always remember the last thing but the dude hadn’t started in 5 years and that was 1 start and they put up 20 on the road against a great defense . A couple battet balls due to not looking off defenders . Looked lik rust . Took a few massive hits with line breakdowns . In all not a terrible debut . Not good enough obviously. Why not try the field goal early ? Who made that call?
NorthHawk wrote:All QBs use throwing lanes to complete passes. I heard one former QB say that it's a bit of an art form so given Geno hasn't played in real game action for 5 years it's something we should expect for the time being. So I'm giving him a pass on the batted ball front.
NorthHawk wrote:What was a little frustrating was how many times he missed short passes and threw them into the dirt in front of the receivers. There were probably 2 or 3 drives stopped by that.
obiken wrote:GS is just a good, not great, and not bad back up, period. Too many of you like River, overestimated him. (There is a reason these guys are backups making thousands, and starters are worth Millions) I would argue that the has played well for a backup, the defense is our biggest problem, last in the league, in everything. We are starting to see how much Russ is really worth.
Hawktawk wrote:I really don’t get this 24.5 number you keep quoting . Geno went 23 for 32 which is 71 % completion rate . He threw for 209 which is just under 10 yards per completion . He threw a touchdown pass and completed passes to ten players . The fumble was bad, a great player made a great play but Geno did not play “ poorly “
By any objective measure . He had a horrible mistake at the end but most coaches would take a road start at Heinz field after 5 years holding a clipboard
c_hawkbob wrote:QBR is a 0-100 scale, it's the old Passer rating that tops pot at 158. Nobody uses QBR but ESPN, it simply hasn't caught on the way they hoped it would.
QBR=g({\frac {AdjustedEPA}{ActionPlays}})},You're right, my bad.
And yes, ESPN is the only ones that use it. However, I think it's a little more reflective of overall quarterback performance than a passer rating. They tend to give a little more credit to running quarterbacks like Lamar Jackson, Josh Allen, and Patrick Mahomes, that's not reflected in a pure passer rating.
I-5 wrote:I said earlier it would be interesting to watch how Geno runs Waldron's system so that we can see how we really look without Russ. So far, it's making Russ look REALLY good. I don't fault Geno for all the problems, and possibly not even Waldron. I have a feeling that contrary to what I had thought before, Pete is pulling some of the strings in game, as in deciding between run and pass. How else can you explain inexplicably running it so many times in a row in the 3rd quarter, even when the Saints were showing up to 9 players on the line of scrimmage?
Hawktawk wrote:I’d say it’s more like the entire team is a failed experiment . Geno played about the same as a former # 1 overall on a horrible night . He’s had protection issues every start . The last 2 defenses we faced were salty with big time all pro talent . . Not converting a win because you got laid out isn’t all on the qb. To me Geno appears to be a decent backup that can move the chains and give the team a chance . The biggest failed experiment is Meyers . We need to look for a kicker . And the officials . Bad . And remember one more thing . Russ was bouncing balls off defenders helmets , missing high and wide and running backwards for huge sacks as well. It was not working .
tarlhawk wrote:Well...that was a hard pill to swallow! I haven't seen any definitive status on Ethan Pocic...but I think he could help stop some of the bleeding from the pass pro interior. I mentioned in earlier posts that Kyle Fuller would be an achilles heel until he got more experience under his belt. The center needs to set the rest of the offensive line based on what he recognizes while looking at the opponents d-line alignment. Usually when a lineman complains of "communication issues" its the center he is talking about without giving a name.
Russell was a big help to Fuller resetting pass pro based on his own experience as he came up under center. Geno takes a lot longer trying to re-adjust pass pro and sometimes he abandoned re-setting it as it is more of a distraction to him than it is for RW. This communicating weakness in passing along needed info to the rest of the line...is exposed even more when the opponent has an above avg d-line. I'm not sure of Geno's hand size but one of RW's advantages when playing in bad weather is his large hands (better grip).
NorthHawk wrote:There aren't many backups that are good enough to start in the NFL, so teams have to adjust. We don't have the talent to help out any backup QB let alone one that hasn't seen real action for 5 years. There's a reason why Wilson is a Pro Bowl QB and Geno is a backup. The gulf between them is huge but that's what's to be expected I suppose as how do you justify a top tier backup QB when your QB hasn't missed a game in something like 10 years? It's ironic that with all of the hits Wilson has taken over the years it was a finger injury that took him down.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 45 guests