HawkShack.com

Too soon?

Bob, I agree its too soon. It’s more HOW they’re losing - they’re not looking competitive. For the first time in a long time, I didnt have the usual faith in Russ to bring us back. Did you see the Viking game as an anomaly? I hope I’m wrong, but they looked clueless to me esp in the secondary.

I-5 wrote:Bob, I agree its too soon. It’s more HOW they’re losing - they’re not looking competitive. For the first time in a long time, I didnt have the usual faith in Russ to bring us back. Did you see the Viking game as an anomaly? I hope I’m wrong, but they looked clueless to me esp in the secondary.

Under most circumstances, not even making it through 1/4 of a season is way too early to be declaring a disaster. But in addition to how bad we've looked in our two losses, one of the differences between this year and other slow start seasons is how our division is shaping up. The Rams just got through beating the defending champs by two scores, the Cards have beaten the two teams that we lost to, and the Niners are 16 seconds and a walk off 51 yard FG from being 3-0.

But at the risk of sounding like a broken record, I'm waiting another couple of weeks before I press and hold the power button on this season.

I-5 wrote:Bob, I agree its too soon. It’s more HOW they’re losing - they’re not looking competitive. For the first time in a long time, I didnt have the usual faith in Russ to bring us back. Did you see the Viking game as an anomaly? I hope I’m wrong, but they looked clueless to me esp in the secondary.

You cannot bring us back down by 2 scores with no TOP. Is it too soon maybe, but as I told River on another post Pitts is D-Day H-Hour for this season, we lose the them on the road its over, and with their front 4 we could.