HawkShack.com

Per PFT:

The Seahawks listed C Ethan Pocic (neck) and CB Neiko Thorpe (hamstring) as doubtful for Sunday’s game. CB Tre Flowers (ankle) and S Tedric Thompson (hamstring) drew questionable tags.


Seahawks running back Rashaad Penny injured his hamstring in Friday’s practice. That prompted the team to add him to their status report as questionable for Sunday against the Saints

We should get our first look at Ziggy:

"Ziggy is ready to play, ready to play football," Seahawks coach Pete Carroll told reporters Friday. "We're excited to see that. It's been a really good process to get in to this where he's in good shape, too ... We'll be able to get him a bunch of plays in this game and we look forward to his participation with us."

https://www.msn.com/en-us/sports/nfl/se ... spartanntp

Good. It’s about time we get a look at him and how he’ll be used.

Our entire projected starting Front 7 on D for the first time (+ Collier available) and the starting 5 Oline, all off the injury list, too. It's the 3 CB's and a safety that are the issue right now. Maybe we should of tried a little harder for the kid that went from Miami to Pitts.

jshawaii22 wrote:Our entire projected starting Front 7 on D for the first time (+ Collier available) and the starting 5 Oline, all off the injury list, too. It's the 3 CB's and a safety that are the issue right now. Maybe we should of tried a little harder for the kid that went from Miami to Pitts.

Not quite. Reed is still on suspension.

He's not on the 53 man roster, so he doesn't count.

Then when do we get Reed back?

obiken wrote:Then when do we get Reed back?

Week 7 vs. the Ravens.

Geez! River a question for you or CB, do the Pats still have to pay the Draft choice for him to the Raiders?

I'll butt in here.
Yes, they would still have to pay the Raiders the agreed compensation.
After all, he was signed and played a game for them, so it was buyer beware in this case unless there was some sort of
performance target agreement that would mitigate the compensation. But we didn't hear of anything so I doubt there was.

edit:
They might not have to pay Brown all of his contracted money, though. That might be a bit of a fight.

obiken wrote:Geez! River a question for you or CB, do the Pats still have to pay the Draft choice for him to the Raiders?

What draft pick? He was cut from the Raiders and the pats signed him. They didn’t have to give up anything to sign him (except some money and their dignity- the second of which they have very little of anyway).

obiken wrote:Geez! River a question for you or CB, do the Pats still have to pay the Draft choice for him to the Raiders?

mykc14 wrote:What draft pick? He was cut from the Raiders and the pats signed him. They didn’t have to give up anything to sign him (except some money and their dignity- the second of which they have very little of anyway).

The Raiders are the ones on the hook for the draft picks. They traded a 3rd and a 5th to Pittsburgh for Brown. The Steelers are the ones that got the last laugh over the Brown debacle.

Yeah my understanding is that the Pats could be out as little as a couple hundred grand for the whole episode.

Oh, right. He was traded from Pittsburgh and a FA pickup of the Pats.
There might be a fight over the signing bonus, though.

From my understanding, whether or not Brown gets to keep his signing bonus, or a certain percentage of it, depends on if he knew of the allegations and failed to disclose them to the Pats prior to signing.

The guy had legitimate HOF credentials, with 7 Pro Bowls and 6 straight seasons with 100+ receptions. Now he doesn't stand a snowball's chance in hell of getting in.

I haven't seen a crash and burn like Antonio Brown for a while.