Hawktawk wrote:Granted, as the thread indicates Gruden is doing a horrible job and should have stayed in the booth. I wonder how mark davis feels having nearly A QUARTER OF A BILLION!!!!! wrapped up in an ineffective coach and a bad qb who is morphing into David.The next game will be a litmus test for whether the niners have stumbled onto something but the raiders are dreadful.
NorthHawk wrote:I'm sure one of Gruden's picks will be Bosa to replace Mack.
I suspect another might be N'Keal Harry to replace Cooper or perhaps Parris Campbell if he wants speed.
Those two players alone clear up a lot of Cap space that would have been demanded had they re-signed them.
Uppercut wrote:Game passed him by?
Niners beating them to pulp. Ouch
Niner game a trap game for Hawks
c_hawkbob wrote:In the only trade I can think of that compares to this one those draft picks draft picks the Cowboys got for Herschel Walker made all the difference in the world.
c_hawkbob wrote:In the only trade I can think of that compares to this one those draft picks draft picks the Cowboys got for Herschel Walker made all the difference in the world.
idhawkman wrote:That said, I'd put money on a SB winning coach and a coach that basically took 2 teams to the same SB.
idhawkman wrote:I agree with Bob, the picks may not turn out to be much but they may also turn out to be the difference. Until they've been picked and play a year or two together we won't know which it is. That said, I'd put money on a SB winning coach and a coach that basically took 2 teams to the same SB.
NorthHawk wrote:The draft and the following UDFA signing are about selecting potential.
Sometimes it's a disappointment and sometimes it's an unexpected success.
But the bottom line is coaches who have the power of selecting personnel
usually want their guys to win or lose with.
We'll see how it goes in Oakland or rather Las Vegas when the new team has
been put together.
NorthHawk wrote:They're going to draw pretty well, but I wonder if they can develop a true home field advantage with the city being such a draw on its own.
RiverDog wrote:
If they hit the ground running, like they did with their NHL franchise, then they can draw in the locals, which IMO is why you see them selling off their best players for draft picks. But even if they don't, they'll still sell tickets as visiting teams will scoop them up.
Unless the current scheduling format changes before then, the first time we'll play the Raiders in Las Vegas during the regular season will be in 2026.
idhawkman wrote:Is that because technically they (Raiders) were the home team this year so we will be in 2022?
I didn't think they rotated that way for interconference play but I never understand how they determine those issues. E.g. we play the NFC North this year - it always seem slike we end up playing the same teams on their home field as opposed to ours.
RiverDog wrote:
We play each team in one of the AFC divisions each year, or once every 4 years for any given AFC team. We play each team in one NFC divisions once every three years, but in addition to the divisional rotation, we play the same place finisher in the two NFC divisions that we don't happen to be playing. This season, we're playing all teams from the NFC North and the same place finishers from the NFC South on the road (Panthers) and NFC East at home (Cowboys)
It's just a coincidence that we end up playing the same team every year. There for awhile, it seemed like we were always facing the Panthers back there.
idhawkman wrote:I understood how the rotation worked I just can't figure out how they determine the venue for each game. As you pointed out, it always seemed like we played the panthers in their home until they came to the Clink for a playoff game. It also seems like we travel to Miami and TB more than we should but that could be my memory playing tricks on me.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 38 guests