HawkShack.com

So for today, Russel was 26/41, 63%, 11ypa, 452 yards 4tds and 1 int and there were 3 dropped catchable balls 1 that was a td and a Qb rating of 123.2. Now add to that another 30 yards rushing and you get 482. Keep in mind without Rws rushing we were 17 for 3 yards rushing.

As a team we had 479 yards of offense, Rw by himself had 482. Add tot hat no help form run game, 3 drops and 120 yards in penalties, while the defense gave up 38 points. That's how you carry a team, and that is the definition of Elite.

Through 7 games Rw has 2008 yards, 15 tds 4 ints, Complt 63.5, 7.8 ypa, Qb rating 98.8 and 194 rushing yards 5.3 ypa, 1 td

Nothing to argue with there!

You made no mention of the catches the receivers did make to help Rus pile up those stats. He played well but he didn’t do it all on his own. The defense played poorly, but also came away with 3 picks, just enough to help seal the deal. the end result is the total of the whole, not just one. When I watch a game I watch the Seahawks...not just Russell. Remember, worshiping false gods is a sin. A matter of fact it is the #1 commandment. See you in the confessional.
The Pope

The POPE wrote:You made no mention of the catches the receivers did make to help Rus pile up those stats. He played well but he didn’t do it all on his own. The defense played poorly, but also came away with 3 picks, just enough to help seal the deal. the end result is the total of the whole, not just one. When I watch a game I watch the Seahawks...not just Russell. Remember, worshiping false gods is a sin. A matter of fact it is the #1 commandment. See you in the confessional.
The Pope

It is not worshiping to speak the truth you should try it some time. Maybe you should follow your own statement and go to confessional. Simple fact Wilson carried this team the facts show it, so deal with it.

Russell's a bad man.

Defense did score 6 points. For all Russell did, we don't win without Earls' pick six. Receivers did step up today, while the RBs were stepped on.

Aseahawkfan wrote:Russell's a bad man.

Defense did score 6 points. For all Russell did, we don't win without Earls' pick six. Receivers did step up today, while the RBs were stepped on.

LOL it always amazes me how if the defense plays well and we win it does not matter what the offense does we won by Defense, or if a defensive player plays well its all about him, but when its the offense and specifically Wilson we have to downplay it. Sure glad the players see it for what it is as they all come have out and said RW carried the team. At least they appreciate him. There is a difference between making a play and carrying the team. ET made a play, Rw carried the team.

Anthony wrote:LOL it always amazes me how if the defense plays well and we win it does not matter what the offense does we won by Defense, or if a defensive player plays well its all about him, but when its the offense and specifically Wilson we have to downplay it. Sure glad the players see it for what it is as they all come have out and said RW carried the team. At least they appreciate him. There is a difference between making a play and carrying the team. ET made a play, Rw carried the team.

As Russell would tell you, this is a team game. He's not throwing to himself. No player carries the team or wins alone in football or any team sport. Period.

Russell had a great day. No one denies it. You can't seem to accept when he has bad days. You make excuse after excuse after excuse.

Aseahawkfan wrote:
As Russell would tell you, this is a team game. He's not throwing to himself. No player carries the team or wins alone in football or any team sport. Period.

Russell had a great day. No one denies it. You can't seem to accept when he has bad days. You make excuse after excuse after excuse.

hmm and yet I was saying how he missed 2 wide open guys last week, meanwhile you are still double talking, so if this is team game when he plays great, then it must be when he plays bad, yet you only say it when he plays well hmm.

Tony; I believe, unless I am mistaken, that you were pointing out that RW is an elite QB whereas most of the pundits don't put him into the same category as Tom Brady, Aaron Rodgers, or Drew Brees. They will of course now search to find that one or two that do ignoring the word "most". Just keep pointing out their hypocrisy, it drives them nuts. Wait for it, wait for it, wait for it, for their next act they will claim we are one in the same...

It is sad that they feel the need to bully others, maybe they do it in order to validate themselves.

Anthony wrote:hmm and yet I was saying how he missed 2 wide open guys last week, meanwhile you are still double talking, so if this is team game when he plays great, then it must be when he plays bad, yet you only say it when he plays well hmm.

I rarely say anything bad about Russell Wilson. Russell Wilson is a stud.

You're so psychotic about supporting him that you take anything you deem even slightly critical of Wilson and start repetitively posting across several different forums. It's pretty nutty.

Seahawks4Ever wrote:Tony; I believe, unless I am mistaken, that you were pointing out that RW is an elite QB whereas most of the pundits don't put him into the same category as Tom Brady, Aaron Rodgers, or Drew Brees. They will of course now search to find that one or two that do ignoring the word "most". Just keep pointing out their hypocrisy, it drives them nuts. Wait for it, wait for it, wait for it, for their next act they will claim we are one in the same...

It is sad that they feel the need to bully others, maybe they do it in order to validate themselves.

What rich hypocrisy that last statement.

Yea, it will be a cold day in hell when Anthony makes a complete post that includes the negative parts of Russell's game and/or highlight efforts made by our receivers or OL (which gave him an above average amount of time) to go along with his usual blowing of smoke up Russell's hind end.

Russell played a great game yesterday, statistically the best of his career, but to be fair, he nearly lost it for us when he threw a very ill advised pick late in the 4th quarter, and either through instruction from Bevell or his own decision making, had lots of opportunities to keep the ball and make some substantial yardage off the read option, perhaps open things up for our running backs.

But I'm not complaining, as IMO Russell's negatives were far outweighed by his positives.

That win was Russell Wilson, nobody else.
The Defense had one of, if not its worst day in the last 5 years and the Offense couldn't run the ball.

Consider Wilson threw for 450+ yards and the team could only muster 33 yards running. Oh yeah, Wilson ran for 31 of those rushing yards, so in reality the Offense ran for 2 net yards.
Wilson was the Offense on Sunday, even if he did make some mistakes.

Another observation is that the pass blocking is better than the run blocking.
It doesn't usually work that way, but it has to be fixed. We can't consistently win with 2 yards by our RB's.
It makes you wonder why we let Alex Collins go as he's leading the league in rushing average and making some real good plays for the Ravens.
I guess it's just another odd evaluation on the Offensive side of the ball.

Seahawks4Ever wrote:Tony; I believe, unless I am mistaken, that you were pointing out that RW is an elite QB whereas most of the pundits don't put him into the same category as Tom Brady, Aaron Rodgers, or Drew Brees. They will of course now search to find that one or two that do ignoring the word "most". Just keep pointing out their hypocrisy, it drives them nuts. Wait for it, wait for it, wait for it, for their next act they will claim we are one in the same...

It is sad that they feel the need to bully others, maybe they do it in order to validate themselves.

I agree with everything you say

Aseahawkfan wrote:
I rarely say anything bad about Russell Wilson. Russell Wilson is a stud.

You're so psychotic about supporting him that you take anything you deem even slightly critical of Wilson and start repetitively posting across several different forums. It's pretty nutty.

LOL and again I go back to were I questioned 2 throws he missed last week, which pretty much makes your statement moot.

Aseahawkfan wrote:
What rich hypocrisy that last statement.

Sad no, ,true yes.

NorthHawk wrote:That win was Russell Wilson, nobody else.
The Defense had one of, if not its worst day in the last 5 years and the Offense couldn't run the ball.

Consider Wilson threw for 450+ yards and the team could only muster 33 yards running. Oh yeah, Wilson ran for 31 of those rushing yards, so in reality the Offense ran for 2 net yards.
Wilson was the Offense on Sunday, even if he did make some mistakes.

Another observation is that the pass blocking is better than the run blocking.
It doesn't usually work that way, but it has to be fixed. We can't consistently win with 2 yards by our RB's.
It makes you wonder why we let Alex Collins go as he's leading the league in rushing average and making some real good plays for the Ravens.
I guess it's just another odd evaluation on the Offensive side of the ball.

As to Collins I really believe it is about the oline and the oline scheme.

RiverDog wrote:Yea, it will be a cold day in hell when Anthony makes a complete post that includes the negative parts of Russell's game and/or highlight efforts made by our receivers or OL (which gave him an above average amount of time) to go along with his usual blowing of smoke up Russell's hind end.

Russell played a great game yesterday, statistically the best of his career, but to be fair, he nearly lost it for us when he threw a very ill advised pick late in the 4th quarter, and either through instruction from Bevell or his own decision making, had lots of opportunities to keep the ball and make some substantial yardage off the read option, perhaps open things up for our running backs.

But I'm not complaining, as IMO Russell's negatives were far outweighed by his positives.

And it will be an even colder day in hell when you post anything good about Wilson without your standard but. FYI yeah you are complaining, if you weren't would not have even said it. It is what you do, find nitpick stuff to complain about with regards to Wilson, You always have and always will. Oh and as to your cold day in hell I guess you did not read or purposely left out were I made a statement about with regards to the 2 wide open guys he missed just last week. Its is pretty pathetic when instead of talking about how great he played you want to talk about what if. Also pretty amazing how when he plays bad according to you, it is him but when he plays well it has to be everyone else.

I think RW is a great QB, he's our guy. However, Watson will be the Michael Jordan of the NFL.

obiken wrote:I think RW is a great QB, he's our guy. However, Watson will be the Michael Jordan of the NFL.

And he seems to be a great guy as well. He donated his first ever paycheck to hurricane relief, and in doing so, instantly became my favorite non Seahawk player, and yes, he played very well yesterday, especially when you consider he was going up against the best defense in the league in the toughest environment in the league.

But the Michael Jordan of the NFL? He's not going to acquire that status by throwing 3 interceptions.

obiken wrote:I think RW is a great QB, he's our guy. However, Watson will be the Michael Jordan of the NFL.

Need to see more of him to say that, lots of guys had 1 good year, first year, not tape. let see how he does next year, way way to early to say he is the M of the NFL

RiverDog wrote:
And he seems to be a great guy as well. He donated his first ever paycheck to hurricane relief, and in doing so, instantly became my favorite non Seahawk player, and yes, he played very well yesterday, especially when you consider he was going up against the best defense in the league in the toughest environment in the league.

But the Michael Jordan of the NFL? He's not going to acquire that status by throwing 3 interceptions.

Holy moly I totally agree with you wow

obiken wrote:I think RW is a great QB, he's our guy. However, Watson will be the Michael Jordan of the NFL.

We shall see. Same thing has been said about Luck and RG3 and Dak Prescott. It's very hard to do it every year. I don't believe there will ever be a Michael Jordan of the NFL. The closest we've come is Brady. He has five rings in seven trips in 18 years or playing. That is amazing. If Brady wins another ring, he is the Michael Jordan of the NFL. This kid has a long way to go to match Brady.

It is not worshiping to speak the truth you should try it some time. Maybe you should follow your own statement and go to confessional. Simple fact Wilson carried this team the facts show it, so deal with it.[/quote]


I will be there.....waiting for you.!
The Pope