http://www.sbnation.com/2016/12/30/1412 ... n-contract
EXTENDED!!!!!!!!!! YAY
c_hawkbob wrote:First player in the Carroll era to be extended with more than one year left on his current contract. This is a big precedent. But I think the most important thing about it is that the team showed a willingness to recognise when a contract is being so severely outplayed and address the situation. Bennett decided not to hold out before the season on the promise that theyed get something worked out and the promise has been kept.
I couldn't be happier, for Bennett and for the Seahawks!
obiken wrote:
Your not worried that he hasn't gotten a sack since he has come back off his knee surgery CB??
No, I consider that a statistical anomaly. Watching him play he's as quick and disruptive and spends as much time in the opponent's backfield as he ever has, it's just happenstance that somebody else has been getting to the QB first. Cliff and Frank wouldn't be getting the sacks they're getting without the attention Bennet gets. That's the life of an inside rusher.
burrrton wrote:I hope I'm wrong, but I never like seeing guys on my team signing 'I just hit the lottery' type contracts. It's a reality of professional sports, but it's almost never good for the team, and the team is all I care about.
He deserves his money.
Hawktawk wrote:Not everybody was excited when SA got inked and Hutchinson was let go.
Mike Bennett never gets the sack numbers one other guys do because he is a true defender not a rush specialist.
He disrupts virtually every play that is in his range.
Belichick in game super bowl 49 sound fx " the only one doing anything is #72"
Mike put on his hard hat and came to work every week and played his ass off disgruntled for years.
He deserves his money.
Of all the really big money deals by Seattle the last ten years the only one that really didn't work out was SA.
NorthHawk wrote:Some DEs play effectively well into their 30s and if he stays healthy he could be one of them.
NE has dumped players before their slide on a number of occasions, as have all teams, but they also kept a few who continued to produce, so it's really a crap shoot as to when it's time to let them go.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 47 guests