HawkShack.com

Seahawks go 0-4 in next 4 games.

take it to the bank

I will bet you $1000 & give you 2-1 odds on your "bold prediction". Put your money where your mouth is. We can set it up completely legal. We both put the cash in a neutral paypal account, & the winner gets the money.

I want in that action; hope you have a decent bankroll, Rambo.

Pay up Rambo!

I did not bet!

How could I bet on games that always seem to end in controversy in the Seahawks favor

Wait till next week LOL

Maybe he's not as stupid as he sounds...

Rambo2014 wrote:I did not bet!

With your insight, I wouldn't risk losing my chewing gum by betting on the outcome of a football game. You know the saying: A fool and their money are soon parted.

2 and 0 since the great "Rambo" prediction. All we hear are the sounds of crickets...

I retract my previous statement....

'Take it to the bank'...based on your track record, huh?

PI last night on Kam on last play. can't fight the favorable calls occurring week after week!

Rams starting to move now as is ARZ, but my second team Cowboys look like the ticket

Rambo2014 wrote:PI last night on Kam on last play. can't fight the favorable calls occurring week after week!

Rams starting to move now as is ARZ, but my second team Cowboys look like the ticket

There was incidental contact between both Kam and Gronk but it wasn't enough to alter the play. As Collingsworth said, it was a good no-call. And I heard absolutely no complaints from any Pats players/fans about that play or anything else regarding the officiating. If it would have been as bad as you're trying to make it out, they'd be squawking like a squished chicken. You're grasping for straws, trying to save face instead of manning up and admitting that you were wrong.

Rambo2014 wrote:PI last night on Kam on last play. can't fight the favorable calls occurring week after week!

Rams starting to move now as is ARZ, but my second team Cowboys look like the ticket

Surely you mean the uncalled "Offensive PI"? since that's exactly what it was. There was no D-PI, Gronk turned and ran into Kam. Defenders have a right to their space. Read the rules.

Rambo2014 wrote:but my second team Cowboys look like the ticket

LOL. The team I started trolling you with sucks so now I'm going to pick whatever team is in first place. Let me guesss favorite baseball team.... Cubs; favorite basketball team... Cavs; favorite woman's 300m steeplechaser... Ruth Jebet

Not sure, Ramblo's favorite team this week is the Eagles I'm pretty sure..... Pretty much, anyone playing Seattle, and strangely enough, that team is perfect, never commits a penalty ( for instance a blatant OPI) and Seattle doesn't beat them, so much, as they get lucky, get help or simply have it fixed by the NFL.....

you can lead the a## to water, but you can't make it drink...

Rambo2014 wrote:PI last night on Kam on last play. can't fight the favorable calls occurring week after week!

Rams starting to move now as is ARZ, but my second team Cowboys look like the ticket

The rams won 9 to 6, against the jets. Cardinals could barely beat the 49ers. Yeah, really starting to roll. Conveniently, your second team is the team with the best record in the league? Sounds like a typical la douschebag fan. Gotta have a second team, when your first team sucks so bad. Let me guess, your second team was the patriots, now it is the cowboys after the Pat's lost. I know you are just a troll, but will bite. If you think that was pi on kam, you don't know football. Which would make your year long troll make more sense. You are a pre pubescent boy with little knowledge. But thanks for the material. You think you are bothering people, but we love it. It may be annoying if you were ever correct, but we know the records of our two teams. We can even go back a decade and compare if you would like.

I've listened to Sirius NFL for 4 hours the past two days and not a single talking head or caller has objected to the Kam/Gronk no call, to the contrary, both Gronk and Belichick have come out and said that it was the right call.

RiverDog wrote:I've listened to Sirius NFL for 4 hours the past two days and not a single talking head or caller has objected to the Kam/Gronk no call, to the contrary, both Gronk and Belichick have come out and said that it was the right call.

Seriously! You need to put that play on your study wall and clearly look at the feet. Kam C looks to intentionally tangle his feet in Gronks!

As far a second team I have hopes for the Rams but livin in St. Louis I have also been a big fan of the boys!

BTW I can't stand Philly so if you beat them I will be quiet

Gronk on final play against Kam: “He was playing off me a little bit, pretty far, farther than usual. You usually don’t see that. It was a fade, SO I HAD TO GO UP TO HIM, make a little move. I wasn’t trying to initiate contact actually. IT JUST HAPPENED. Just went up to him, just want to get on top of his toes. That’s what you’re taught. Get on top of your toes, make a little move and release outside. I just got on top of his toes a little too much, obviously, and I wasn’t trying to make contact. I was just trying to make a move and get outside and catch a fade ball.”

He sure sounds mad at the refs, doesn't he? Lol.

http://www.bostonherald.com/sports/patr ... fs_on_call

Goff is the man as of today!

Just in time to watch the team implode. Good timing, the good news is now you have a built in excuse for the Rams failing to make the playoffs.... Again.

Congrats.

Seriously! You need to put that play on your study wall and clearly look at the feet. Kam C looks to intentionally tangle his feet in Gronks

That was really posted. Possibly the absolute dumbest football post, in HISTORY guys, and we got a front row seat to it....

Rambo2014 wrote:Seriously! You need to put that play on your study wall and clearly look at the feet. Kam C looks to intentionally tangle his feet in Gronks!

Yes, seriously. Like I said, unlike the Falcons game, the Bills game, and the Cards game, there was ZERO complaints from any of the players, coaches, or any callers into Pat Kerwin and Brady Quinn's "Moving the Chains" program I spend several hours listening to each morning and I have heard no talking head on a broadcast or in print say anything other than the play was correctly called. As a matter of fact, I didn't hear any complaints from either side about the officiating in this game at all, to the contrary, many commended the officials for a well called game. But I'll gladly eat my words if you want to provide a link to such a complaint...but of course, you won't.

What killed the Pats on that play was the one prior to it. Brady's fumble advanced the down to 4th and put the ball from the one back to the two. That put them in a passing situation, and with a compressed field and a quarterback that isn't very mobile, it usually doesn't work out too well, especially against our defense.

How are those bold predictions working so far?

Were today's results the "moves" you were referring to?

Rambo2014 wrote:Goff is the man as of today!

How did that work for ya. 143 yds....real world class numbers from your boy. It must sting a little.

Is he going to show up to take his weekly lumps? Hahaha.

The D let Gott down yesterday! Just one mistake otherwise he had a good first outing and should be a threat when the Rams play the hawks. Maybe we are not in line for the playoffs this year but Seahawks will have to play top caliber teams like the Skins and Cowboys to move on which there is no way.

Rambo2014 wrote:The D let Gott down yesterday! Just one mistake otherwise he had a good first outing and should be a threat when the Rams play the hawks. Maybe we are not in line for the playoffs this year but Seahawks will have to play top caliber teams like the Skins and Cowboys to move on which there is no way.

MAYBE your not in line for the playoffs?

Talk about a class clown that everyone laughs at. Your total lack of credibility doesn't even qualify you as a troll. As a rule, a troll posts inflammatory remarks designed to provoke others into a corresponding caustic retort, but with you, no one gets mad, they just laugh, like a drunk walking out of a rest room with their fly unzipped.

Hate to break it to you Ramblo's, but claiming 143 yards consisting of nothing but check downs, zero TDs, isn't the D letting you down. Wasn't your retread starter replaced because he wasn't throwing TDs?

Good news for you is, you only need 3 more wins to get to your regular highwater mark of 7 wins, so just .500 ball. Of course the Rams typically can't play at that level. So it might be more difficult than it appears.

I dont get how Fisher is still employed. I love the Rams keep him around tho... all that talent and sub .500 every year. I feel for Goff, under Fisher his career could be headed the way of Vince Young.

I-5 wrote:How are those bold predictions working so far?

So far Ramblow is batting .000 on his prediction that the Seahawks would lose their next 4 games.

Hawkstar wrote:I dont get how Fisher is still employed. I love the Rams keep him around tho... all that talent and sub .500 every year. I feel for Goff, under Fisher his career could be headed the way of Vince Young.

Not only is he still employed, but they recently extended his contract. The Rams are the west coast version of the Browns.

Rambo2014 wrote:The D let Gott down yesterday!

Guys, he doesn't even know the name of the QB he's touting.

Rambo2014 wrote:Just one mistake otherwise he had a good first outing and should be a threat when the Rams play the hawks.

Ummm, that word doesn't mean what you think it means:

Jared Goff’s longest completion travelled 7 yards, and he finished just 5-of-11 for 64 yards on passes thrown more than 5 yards downfield.

https://twitter.com/Edwerderespn/status ... 0895476736

Rambo2014 wrote:The D let Gott down yesterday! Just one mistake otherwise he had a good first outing and should be a threat when the Rams play the hawks. Maybe we are not in line for the playoffs this year but Seahawks will have to play top caliber teams like the Skins and Cowboys to move on which there is no way.

How old are you? Seriously!!!

Ok Ok spell checker is not picking up names and my eyesight failed mt..should be FF..LOL I am old boys, I remember Roman Gabriel the best ever

I think you will have major problems next week against TB, they looked sharp yesterday

So if you aren't 11, You must just be severely mentally challenged. Sorry for picking on you then, just thought you were young and stupid. But, you are just a special boy. Nobody should pick on the mentally challenged. Go Hawks.

I think you will have major problems next week against TB, they looked sharp yesterday

Care to make a wager on that statement?

Jjones84 wrote:So if you aren't 11, You must just be severely mentally challenged. Sorry for picking on you then, just thought you were young and stupid. But, you are just a special boy. Nobody should pick on the mentally challenged. Go Hawks.

You do know that it's not exactly kosher to pick on people with intellectual disabilities, right? They haven't done anything to deserve that kind of a comparison.

Rambo2014 wrote:Ok Ok spell checker is not picking up names and my eyesight failed mt..should be FF..LOL I am old boys, I remember Roman Gabriel the best ever

I think you will have major problems next week against TB, they looked sharp yesterday

I'm pretty sure I'm as old or older than you as I remember Roman Gabriel..and Jack Snow, Rosy Grier, Lamar Lundy, Deacon Jones, Merlin Olson, George Allen, et al and if you think that Gabriel was the best ever, then you must have spent the 60's with your head buried between your lower cheeks as there were at least 6 other QB's in just his era that were better than him. But if you want to limit your claim to just Rams QB's, then maybe Gabriel deserves the "best ever" designation as the best QB's in the over 60 years of history that sorry franchise can put up include such stars as Jim Everett and Vince Feragamo.