Re: Seattle Seahawks sign Tyler Ott
Posted:
Fri Sep 02, 2016 8:23 pmby burrrton
Not surprising: we signed another long snapper.
Surprising (to me): it wasn't Gresham.
Are we really that tight on cap space that his extra few-hundred-thou made a difference, or is he not as solid as I'm remembering??
Re: Seattle Seahawks sign Tyler Ott
Posted:
Fri Sep 02, 2016 9:37 pmby jshawaii22
maybe Gresham just doesn't want to play anymore. If he hasn't continued to stay 'football' ready, he would be no help to us.
Re: Seattle Seahawks sign Tyler Ott
Posted:
Tue Sep 06, 2016 7:42 amby HawkandBalls
http://www.fieldgulls.com/2016/9/3/1278 ... ng-sourcesWell, Ott's out. Do we have a better plan?
I'd rather have Gresham running down the field slowly, than the current guy running quickly to recover his own poor snap.
Re: Seattle Seahawks sign Tyler Ott
Posted:
Wed Sep 07, 2016 8:00 pmby HumanCockroach
Guessing Boyer was exceedingly fast for a long snapper, didn't seem to help him, and I don't remember a single poor snap...
Re: Seattle Seahawks sign Tyler Ott
Posted:
Thu Sep 08, 2016 10:39 amby HawkandBalls
HumanCockroach wrote:Guessing Boyer was exceedingly fast for a long snapper, didn't seem to help him, and I don't remember a single poor snap...
I was thinking the same thing.