Page 1 of 1
Depressing Article Ouch

Posted:
Fri Oct 23, 2015 9:41 am
by Uppercut
Re: Depressing Article Ouch

Posted:
Fri Oct 23, 2015 9:58 am
by RiverDog
Yes, that was definitely the glass half empty viewpoint. Talk about a turd in the punchbowl!
Re: Depressing Article Ouch

Posted:
Fri Oct 23, 2015 10:16 am
by NorthHawk
2nd half problems continue on Offense.
I don't know what the answer is for that except maybe change things up a little so the Defensive adjustments of the other team don't work as well.
Re: Depressing Article Ouch

Posted:
Fri Oct 23, 2015 10:26 am
by mykc14
Looks like somebody hasn't been watching too much Seahawks football the past few years. Last night is how we play most games. I have no problem admitting we beat a bad team but that is usually the exact way we beat bad teams. We still need to fix the second half issues on O, especially along the OL, but really we dominated that game.
Re: Depressing Article Ouch

Posted:
Fri Oct 23, 2015 10:30 am
by depaashaas
Funny here is the article about cheese heads beating the niners just two weeks ago and nothing but praise for packers both offense and defense
http://www.usatoday.com/story/sports/nf ... /73364054/And now the Hawks hold the niners to lower numbers and even scored more points than cheese heads but we are just a bad team. I think those reporters are cheese fans and hate every other team in the league
Re: Depressing Article Ouch

Posted:
Fri Oct 23, 2015 10:35 am
by mykc14
depaashaas wrote:Funny here is the article about cheese heads beating the niners just two weeks ago and nothing but praise for packers both offense and defense
http://www.usatoday.com/story/sports/nf ... /73364054/And now the Hawks hold the niners to lower numbers and even scored more points than cheese heads but we are just a bad team. I think those reporters are cheese fans and hate every other team in the league
Man, that is funny.
Re: Depressing Article Ouch

Posted:
Fri Oct 23, 2015 10:47 am
by NorthHawk
2 different authors, apparently and two different viewpoints.
Re: Depressing Article Ouch

Posted:
Fri Oct 23, 2015 10:55 am
by depaashaas
NorthHawk wrote:2 different authors, apparently and two different viewpoints.
dang it, I thought I had them

Re: Depressing Article Ouch

Posted:
Fri Oct 23, 2015 10:56 am
by NorthHawk
I'm only suspecting that they are 2 different authors as I couldn't find a name on the GB article.
Re: Depressing Article Ouch

Posted:
Fri Oct 23, 2015 12:49 pm
by Hawktawk
This writer is a hater and an idiot to boot. They cant have it both ways. The fact is 2 weeks ago the 9ers should have beaten a hot Giants team in NY with a Kapernic late drive except for an incredible Eli Manning drive in the final seconds. Last week they rather handily dispatched the Ravens with Kap throwing for 340 yards and 2 TDs with no picks. The buzz around the league was how much Kap had improved over the last few weeks, reading the field better, making better decisions, taking snaps under center BLAH BLAH BLAH. Then Seattle comes in there and slaps them back to the leather helmet era and now they were just a bad team all along and Kap cant play worth a damn.....OK whatever.
Re: Depressing Article Ouch

Posted:
Fri Oct 23, 2015 1:51 pm
by HumanCockroach
Eh, whatever, let them talk, it's what they do. Last season about this time Seattle was not even going to the playoffs, much less the Superbowl. Ignore their stupidity. They might end up being right, but in the end it's how you build throughout the season. Hopefully the Seahawks have taken step one in a long journey.
Re: Depressing Article Ouch

Posted:
Fri Oct 23, 2015 4:50 pm
by RiverDog
HumanCockroach wrote:Eh, whatever, let them talk, it's what they do. Last season about this time Seattle was not even going to the playoffs, much less the Superbowl. Ignore their stupidity. They might end up being right, but in the end it's how you build throughout the season. Hopefully the Seahawks have taken step one in a long journey.
10-4. Their opinion is no more or less valid than any of ours. The only difference is that they have access to the media.