HawkShack.com

You can only keep one Wilson or Lynch who and why?

This is a no-brainer. You keep Wilson 100x out of 100. Lynch is a beast but when it comes down to it you keep the franchise player at the most important position in sports. Taking it a step further, if you have to, Wilson is much younger playing a position that you can produce until a later age while Lynch is approaching the end of his productive years as an NFL player, again no brainer.

I can't believe this is even a question. Lynch is at (or near) the end of his career, Wilson's got at least a solid decade in him.

This is the silliest proposition I've ever heard. Is there anyone in their right mind, or anyone over the age of 6, that would assign the higher priority to Lynch over Wilson? The choice is so obvious that the question isn't even worth voting on.

RiverDog wrote:This is the silliest proposition I've ever heard. Is there anyone in their right mind, or anyone over the age of 6, that would assign the higher priority to Lynch over Wilson? The choice is so obvious that the question isn't even worth voting on.

and yet someone already voted fro Lynch.

This is the silliest proposition I've ever heard. Is there anyone in their right mind, or anyone over the age of 6, that would assign the higher priority to Lynch over Wilson? The choice is so obvious that the question isn't even worth voting on.

and yet someone already voted fro Lynch.

Well, then they must have been under the age of 6

Anthony, I love your passion for all things Seahawks, but you can't stress or worry about the RW3 thing, or how Lynch is being handled right now. It will all take care of itself. You have to know Pete and John are handling things professionally and the right things will happen.

I think you just need to take a little step back sometimes in your stance and see it from a broader view. Just my opinion man, not coming down on you.