I-5 wrote:I honestly don’t understand why Seahawks would let Penny walk if the offer from Philly is that low. Even if he didn’t play the whole year, the production he showed when healthy is well worth the minimal cost.
I-5 wrote:I honestly don’t understand why Seahawks would let Penny walk if the offer from Philly is that low. Even if he didn’t play the whole year, the production he showed when healthy is well worth the minimal cost.
NorthHawk wrote:Injuries are always a concern and it's why we should draft another top RB. Splitting the reps can keep both healthy and with the season now 17 games with an Offense where the run game is critical to its success, it's really important to have someone to share the load in a meaningful way.
MackStrongIsMyHero wrote:Making we want to trade down even more. Maybe pickup Bijan Robinson middle of the first.
I still would rather have had Penny, but I tend to want to hold on to everybody. Still have to trust our FO will get the players we need.
obiken wrote: I think its a great pickup Riv, but 51 million is a little steep.
Hawktawk wrote:Just heard rumors Rogers to jets is a done deal . Also Lamar Jackson may be 9ers bound and not sure how to feel about that . Scared a little .
Hawktawk wrote:There was something worth wanting to hang on to . If he was a 4ypc guy he’d have been done long ago . But he averaged 7.1 his last 5 games of 21. His last complete game as a Seahawk was a thing of beauty vs the lions housing it on an audible on 3rd and 18.
Mike Salk is bummed . He things Penny could lead the league in rushing in Philly .
Hawktawk wrote:Just heard rumors Rogers to jets is a done deal . Also Lamar Jackson may be 9ers bound and not sure how to feel about that . Scared a little .
Aseahawkfan wrote:No, it wasn't. Getting hurt when you're needed in the playoffs is seriously problematic. Seahawks no longer want that risk or that problem. They gave him 5 years. That was plenty. Not sure why you think otherwise.
I-5 wrote:There simply is no way to know how a player will be in terms of injuries. CMC is always hurt, yet he contributed greatly to SF's run. You never know. At that price, he would be well worth the risk to me. But maybe HT is right, it was Penny's choice.
I-5 wrote:There simply is no way to know how a player will be in terms of injuries. CMC is always hurt, yet he contributed greatly to SF's run. You never know. At that price, he would be well worth the risk to me. But maybe HT is right, it was Penny's choice.
Aseahawkfan wrote:That's why they gave Penney 5 years. Every chance to get healthy and produce. You reached a point where you've given a player every opportunity to get going and then you let him move on, see if he can salvage something somewhere else.
I-5 wrote:I think it's fair to call out conditioning when it comes to injuries like strains or pulls that Penny has suffered. But when you're on the bottom of a pile and monsters are falling on top of your leg, I don't know how much conditioning can save you. I'd say it's fair to say Penny has been a mix of both. In 5 years, he didn't play nearly enough, but when he did play, he was quite effective, and more recently a game breaker type of back. I'll be happy for him if he puts it together for Philly, if at our expense.
Thanks Riv! I'm kind of sporadic on here, I know.
NorthHawk wrote:The Seahawks are supposed to be hosting LB Devin Bush and S Julian Love.
Some of the Steeler fans think Bush is horrible calling him Devin Bust and saying things like he's worse than Cody Barton. But we do need ILB's with Brooks recovering from his ACL tear and Barton gone along with Muse being released.
It's interesting that they are hosting a S considering the money we have on the table at the moment. Maybe Adams isn't recovering well from his injury?
NorthHawk wrote:It's not Pete's defense any more. He ran a 4-3 Under and we are now using a 3-4. Different responsibilities for DBs and Safeties.
Adams was an OK tackler but has average coverage and ball skills which are more in demand in a 3-4. He is more hype than production.
But I hope he fully heals so he can have a very good life after football whenever that may be.
c_hawkbob wrote:Bringing Drew Lock back at up to $7.5M. Evidently Pete really did like our QB room.
Agent 86 wrote:He just made some real bonehead throws ending up in INT's that looked awful.
Agent 86 wrote:He just made some real bonehead throws ending up in INT's that looked awful.[/
“Rd
The problem is that it's those real bonehead throws that cost him his job in Denver and the reason why the Broncos tossed him in on the Russell trade.
RiverDog wrote:The problem is that it's those real bonehead throws that cost him his job in Denver and the reason why the Broncos tossed him in on the Russell trade.
Hawktawk wrote:Jamal Adams was filmed walking with a distinct limp recently. As horrific as the injury was he may be *recovered* at some point but maybe never the same. For all his detractors it was Adams speed and explosiveness that made him special. I see no way hes ready for the season and in fact Pete had said he would need all this off season at least . Neal's decent but not top shelf by any means. Pete's defense is based on outstanding safety play which is why they reached for Adams to begin with,
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 33 guests