RiverDog wrote:A couple of observations:
I haven't seen any of the evidence, but 6 games seems extraordinary considering the fact that Reed was not arrested or charged.
The incident happened over two years ago. That amount of time seems outrageous to me, that the process is that slow.
Anyone want to take a shot at explaining those observations to me?
RiverDog wrote:A couple of observations:
I haven't seen any of the evidence, but 6 games seems extraordinary considering the fact that Reed was not arrested or charged.
The incident happened over two years ago. That amount of time seems outrageous to me, that the process is that slow.
Anyone want to take a shot at explaining those observations to me?
c_hawkbob wrote:The Seahawks are not Goodell's favorite team.
RiverDog wrote:Seahawks defensive tackle Jarran Reed has been suspended for six games for a violation of the league’s personal conduct policy, according to NFL Network’s Ian Rapoport.
The suspension stems from a May 2017 incident, during which a woman reportedly claimed Reed assaulted her at a home in Bellevue.
“He had his appeal come back on Friday and it was denied,” Rapoport told NFL Network Monday morning. “He was not arrested, he was not charged, he was found culpable by the NFL.
http://sports.mynorthwest.com/676237/re ... fhWdhOiKZU
Just what we need to start off the season.
c_hawkbob wrote:The Seahawks are not Goodell's favorite team.
c_hawkbob wrote:Yes indeed Goodell hears his own appeals. Do you not remember this from the Brady appeals?
jshawaii22 wrote: The officer assigned to the case reviews the play RD, that sounds like appeals for on-field suspensions, not for off-field like Reids.
I think Goodell does the appeal -- it's been a bone of contention over the life of the current Labor contract.
c_hawkbob wrote:Do you really not remember all the kerfuffle over Goodell hearing Brady's appeals of his own rulings?
NorthHawk wrote:According to this story, he was suspended because his accuser cooperated with the NFL
while Hunt’s accuser did not.
https://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2 ... f-justice/
RiverDog wrote:I've been doing some more research regarding the league's appeal process of discipline administered via the personal conduct policy. There were some changes made. Here's an excerpt from an article published in December of 2014:
NFL teams unanimously endorsed a revised and strengthened Personal Conduct Policy for all NFL employees that was presented today at a league meeting in Dallas.
» An appeals process pursuant to Article 46 (Commissioner Discipline) of the Collective Bargaining Agreement for players or to applicable club or league procedures for non-players. The commissioner may name a panel that consists of independent experts to participate in deciding an appeal.
http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap300000 ... uct-policy
Interesting that they used the word "may" instead of "will" with regard to the commissioner setting up an independent arbitrator.
RiverDog wrote:I've been doing some more research regarding the league's appeal process of discipline administered via the personal conduct policy. There were some changes made. Here's an excerpt from an article published in December of 2014:
NFL teams unanimously endorsed a revised and strengthened Personal Conduct Policy for all NFL employees that was presented today at a league meeting in Dallas.
» An appeals process pursuant to Article 46 (Commissioner Discipline) of the Collective Bargaining Agreement for players or to applicable club or league procedures for non-players. The commissioner may name a panel that consists of independent experts to participate in deciding an appeal.
http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap300000 ... uct-policy
Interesting that they used the word "may" instead of "will" with regard to the commissioner setting up an independent arbitrator.
NorthHawk wrote:I think they used may to give some room in different circumstances. It’s smart to not lock yourself into a single option.
obiken wrote:Any way to block Dumbo! I am so sick of that mutant.
Put him on your enemies list. Go into your user control panel and click on friends and foes. Type in "Rambo" in the members search box...not the more descriptive "Ramblow".
c_hawkbob wrote:Do you really not remember all the kerfuffle over Goodell hearing Brady's appeals of his own rulings?
c_hawkbob wrote:Do you really not remember all the kerfuffle over Goodell hearing Brady's appeals of his own rulings?
idhawkman wrote:Didn't Brady appeal to court after that though?
c_hawkbob wrote:Do you really not remember all the kerfuffle over Goodell hearing Brady's appeals of his own rulings?
idhawkman wrote:Didn't Brady appeal to court after that though?
c_hawkbob wrote:Yes and the lower court ruled in his favor but the appeals court upheld Goodell's right to hear his own appeals.
c_hawkbob wrote:Do you really not remember all the kerfuffle over Goodell hearing Brady's appeals of his own rulings?
idhawkman wrote:Didn't Brady appeal to court after that though?
c_hawkbob wrote:Yes and the lower court ruled in his favor but the appeals court upheld Goodell's right to hear his own appeals.
RiverDog wrote:So back to my question: Does anyone know who heard Reed's appeal? It would appear that Goodell had an option to either hear the appeal himself or defer to an arbitrator or some other outside entity.
c_hawkbob wrote:Yes and the lower court ruled in his favor but the appeals court upheld Goodell's right to hear his own appeals.
Users browsing this forum: c_hawkbob and 39 guests