idhawkman wrote:I bet they don't swarm his house with swat teams and tactical gear an hour before dawn. Says they sent his attorney a letter about an arrest warrant.
Without getting too political, I posted on this in the off topic area since this was a result of a human trafficking investigation that Kraft got caught up in.
RiverDog wrote:Kraft is finished as an owner in the NFL. It's a first time misdemeanor solicitation charge, meaning that even if he's found guilty, he'll just have to pay a fine and do some community service, so the legal part is trivial. But the NFL's personal conduct policy specifically states that it is not good enough to simply to be found not guilty of a crime, that they have to uphold themselves to a higher bar. Even if he settles out of court or if they drop the charges, Kraft's reputation has been irreparably damaged.
I've heard some say that the Patriots should be penalized with the forfeiture of draft choices, which is preposterous. This is clearly a personal conduct issue not related to the team so they should not be going after innocent parties. But Kraft will undoubtedly have to sell the team. Heck, they just got through enduring the Jerry Richardson scandal which resulted in his selling of his team, and that scandal was lame compared to what Kraft is being accused of.
This will shake the NFL to its core. Robert Kraft is well liked amongst his peers and a personal friend of the commissioner's. He is one of the most visible owners in the league, and certainly the most successful. The whole NFL community grieved when his wife passed away. Now his reputation is trash, a dirty old man that pays a couple hundred bucks to get rolled by young, perhaps teenaged women, and is the butt of jokes in bars, clubs, and spread across the world on the internet.
It's truly a sad saga to see a fall from grace like this, especially a man of his age in the sunset of his life.
idhawkman wrote:Before we fry him in public court like a couple of recent news stories have in Washington DC and Chicago, maybe we should wait to see if it is actually him. I'm not excusing him, I'm just saying, let's be sure it is him (not a close match look alike) that is on tape.
NorthHawk wrote:I agree with idhawkman on this. It does look damning, though but money has a way of making things that
seem legally problematic to just disappear. He's going to have the best lawyers, too so we'll have to wait
to see how it all unfolds.
NorthHawk wrote:He may have some short term problems, but I think he'll ride it out and then we'll mostly forget about it.
It's the scandal of the day and we are like a dog so when someone says SQUIRREL we all run off in another direction and forget about what we were doing before.
Aseahawkfan wrote:I'm already at the point where I don't care. Unless they find out he was buying an under-aged prostitute sex slave, then I'm about as far into the not caring department as you can go. I don't see this being all that bad for Kraft if he can handle the public image damage control. As far as losing his franchise, do you really think Goodel will do that? I'm skeptical. Jerry Jones has done some dumb things and he's been untouchable. Kraft is in that category.
RiverDog wrote:In the larger scheme of things, I agree, it's a trivial charge. So what, an old man pays to get rolled by some hookers. I can think of much more serious crimes.
Goodell isn't the one that would force Kraft out. Goodell works for the owners, and it would be pressure from them, or pressure from outside the NFL, that could cause Kraft to sell. Personally, I don't think that they would force Kraft to resign, but IMO there's a real possibility that there is enough bad publicity that he decides it would be better for him, the team, and the league to bow out.
But at the very least, the league is going to have to suspend him for a significant amount of time and issue a multi million dollar fine due by virtue of their Personal Conduct Policy as this is about as clear of a violation that exists.
RiverDog wrote:Social media is going nuts with this topic: "Viagra-gate is the most appropriate name as Kraft is always seeking ways for his paid associates to get a better grip on his..."
Aseahawkfan wrote:I think he will get some kind of suspension at worst. I don't see that many people being all that outraged.
Hawktawk wrote:Richardson had to sell the panthers but that involved harassment of his staff. The better example would be Bob Irsay who was caught driving with a pocketful of pain meds in his system and more in his possession. he paid a big fine and was suspended from team operations for 6 games but I think he was in somewhat of a GM capacity. Kraft will not lose the team. I mean WTH they are the most hated dynasty of all time with the possible exception of the NY Yankees. So many scandals.. It's just making for funny memes on FB.
c_hawkbob wrote:You'd think a guy with his money could make more discrete arrangements ...
c_hawkbob wrote:You'd think a guy with his money could make more discrete arrangements ...
obiken wrote:THATS WHAT i SAID!! Get Gronk or Tommy to find a high priced call girl not some cheap hooker!!
NorthHawk wrote:I heard a comment on the radio that said he expects Kraft to give his team to his son and then fade into the background.
It gets the NFL off the hook, but he can still enjoy his team.
Obi;
I realize that you didn't mean it, but if you'll read some of the background on the story, the women weren't "hookers" as one would commonly think of the term. From the accounts I've read, they were virtual slaves that were coerced into this business by false promises of legitimate jobs. That's what makes this story so sordid and despicable and why I feel that Kraft's reputation is damaged beyond repair.
obiken wrote:No I wasn't, and thanks. Minimally, If that is true, he is going to have to give up the team to his son and never be in the sky box again.
RiverDog wrote:I realize that you didn't mean it, but if you'll read some of the background on the story, the women weren't "hookers" as one would commonly think of the term. From the accounts I've read, they were virtual slaves that were coerced into this business by false promises of legitimate jobs. That's what makes this story so sordid and despicable and why I feel that Kraft's reputation is damaged beyond repair.
RiverDog wrote:I realize that you didn't mean it, but if you'll read some of the background on the story, the women weren't "hookers" as one would commonly think of the term. From the accounts I've read, they were virtual slaves that were coerced into this business by false promises of legitimate jobs. That's what makes this story so sordid and despicable and why I feel that Kraft's reputation is damaged beyond repair.
Aseahawkfan wrote:If that is true, then he might be done. If Kraft is involved in a sex slavery ring, that would be grounds for ejection.
RiverDog wrote:
The two cases you are referring to are in no way comparable to this incident. The police weren't involved at all in your DC example and the one in Chicago was fishy from the get go and lacked statements of certainty from LE as those that we've seen in this case.
Additionally, we can assume that these weren't sketchy, amateurish outdoor security cameras that one might see at a private residence or a parking lot. These were cameras set up by the police in a sting operation in small, indoor rooms and were strategically placed by video experts for the purpose of identifying suspects. Especially since Kraft was reportedly recorded on two separate occasions, the likelihood that he is a victim of mistaken identity on both those occasions is pretty low.
So yea, I get waiting for all the facts, especially if a trial outcome is relevant, which according to the NFL's personal conduct policy, a simple innocent verdict does not necessarily let Kraft off the hook. Given what we already know, I feel pretty comfortable going out on a very thick limb in making my assumptions.
idhawkman wrote:My example was how the press jumped on the story without all the info. But hey, twist it to fit your narrative how ever you want. Its what you do.
idhawkman wrote:My business is selling high quality cameras and you are assuming too much. First, the cameras are hidden by under cover officers in the rooms so they are not high quality. Second, the lighting is going to be dim in those rooms which is probably going to be Infra Red (IR) so the videos will be in black and white. I wouldn't jump to any conclusions Riv, else you risk the same exposure as the media in the two examples I provided. We just need to let this simmer and play out. I despise the NE Patriots but in no way am I going to jump on this bandwagon with the allegations as they are. I do reserve the right to change this opinion upon further information but missing that additional information, it is just too quick to pass judgement that it is actually him.
idhawkman wrote:What exactly do you know? Have you seen the video of him? Are you taking other's opinion that it is actually him on the video?
On Monday, probable cause affidavits made clear that one of the days Kraft allegedly visited the massage parlor in question was the morning of the AFC Championship between the Patriots and Chiefs.
idhawkman wrote:I don't understand how Kraft would be soliciting sex in Florida the day his team is playing in KC for a playoff game. That just doesn't make sense.
Here's the headline: On Monday, probable cause affidavits made clear that one of the days Kraft allegedly visited the massage parlor in question was the morning of the AFC Championship between the Patriots and Chiefs.
idhawkman wrote:But as I said, we'll wait and see the evidence before I pass judgement.
RiverDog wrote:
I'm not sure how much more evidence you need, but there's already a substantial amount, and until I hear him refute it by saying something like "that's not me in the video" or "I was never anywhere near the place" just a he hasn't done anything illegal" statement from a spokesman of his, I'm passing my judgment and saying he's as guilty as sin...pardon the pun.
RiverDog wrote:I'm not sure how much more evidence you need, but there's already a substantial amount, and until I hear him refute it by saying something like "that's not me in the video" or "I was never anywhere near the place" just a he hasn't done anything illegal" statement from a spokesman of his, I'm passing my judgment and saying he's as guilty as sin...pardon the pun.
idhawkman wrote:I always wait for the jury verdict in cases like this.
Users browsing this forum: c_hawkbob and 39 guests