RiverDog wrote:It's an oxymoronic statement. They can't both be true. It's like saying "I don't like beer", then adding "but if I did, Budweiser would be my favorite". How can it be your favorite if you don't like beer?
RiverDog wrote:It's an oxymoronic statement. They can't both be true. It's like saying "I don't like beer", then adding "but if I did, Budweiser would be my favorite". How can it be your favorite if you don't like beer?
Aseahawkfan wrote:Not sure what you even mean by this.
Aseahawkfan wrote:It is obvious the team wasn't communicating with him that they were not interested in trading him. He had nothing to do with requesting a trade. He can't control what the team does behind the scenes.
Aseahawkfan wrote:So not sure what you mean by both ways. Teams trade or cut players all the time telling them at the last minute they are getting cut with no advance communication with the player. For all Russ knew the team was attempting to trade him, so his agent let the team know if they don't want him anymore, here is where he might go.
Aseahawkfan wrote:Why aren't you or some of the others in any way blaming the team for the terrible handling of this as well? Why is Russ taking the brunt of this garbage?
Aseahawkfan wrote:Why didn't Pete or Seattle come out and clearly state they weren't interested in trading him?
jshawaii22 wrote:Aseahawkfan wrote:
Why didn't Pete or Seattle come out and clearly state they weren't interested in trading him?
JS did come out after Chicago announced they had made a 'heavy' play and went all-in to try to trade for Russell. JS said "He's not available at any price"... that pretty much summed up the teams feeling, so YES, i put this on Russell and his team, not the Seahawks as it was Russell and his team making all the public statements that were taken as negative and possibly out of context by the public and fans.
Aseahawkfan wrote:
BS.
What about the newsletter? What about that? A newsletter not including any talk of Russ having a career year. That wasn't on the team sending a messed up message?
govandals wrote:I understand if folks want to call it a career year for RW. The raw numbers don't lie, regardless of the opposition.
However, there were stretches in the second half where RW was flat out bad, the worst Russ I've ever seen.
And he capped it off with a home playoff performance of 11-27 (40.7 comp %), 174 yards, 2 tds, 1 Int and a 72.1 rating.
In my eyes, not a career year.
NorthHawk wrote:It’s not ridiculous to expect your team to improve after 5 years.
We’re simply stuck at the point of making the playoffs then laying an egg.
That’s not good enough for a team that says they expect to go to the SB
each year. Every other team in our division has got to the SB since we
were last there.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 44 guests