Hester

Official Seahawks Forum, for the 12th man, by the 12th man.

Hester

Postby Hawktawk » Tue Jan 03, 2017 8:11 pm

Brilliant move. Game changer.
Hawktawk
Legacy
 
Posts: 8481
Joined: Tue Dec 17, 2013 10:57 am

Re: Hester

Postby jshawaii22 » Tue Jan 03, 2017 8:20 pm

he was... a few year's ago anyway... but it gets Richard off the field and that's worth the signing.

js
User avatar
jshawaii22
Legacy
 
Posts: 2001
Joined: Sat Dec 14, 2013 11:32 am

Re: Hester

Postby Hawkstar » Tue Jan 03, 2017 8:42 pm

Maybe he has some mojo left, maybe not. Regardless, anything is better than 25 fair catching everything. Richardson looked fine returning KO's - we needed a proven punt returner.
Hawkstar
Legacy
 
Posts: 748
Joined: Sat Dec 14, 2013 12:13 pm
Location: Bend Oregon

Re: Hester

Postby Hawktawk » Tue Jan 03, 2017 10:01 pm

hester has arrived in a dream scenario . Championship quality playoff team set up to block for an explosive returner.
He's going to house one.
Hawktawk
Legacy
 
Posts: 8481
Joined: Tue Dec 17, 2013 10:57 am

Re: Hester

Postby Stream Hawk » Tue Jan 03, 2017 10:24 pm

I dig it. Didn't know he was still in the league but Hester may have one last mojo in a bottle for us. Seems like a win win and he can at least give us better field position.
Stream Hawk
Legacy
 
Posts: 622
Joined: Sat Dec 14, 2013 11:08 am

Re: Hester

Postby obiken » Tue Jan 03, 2017 10:53 pm

Stream Hawk wrote:I dig it. Didn't know he was still in the league but Hester may have one last mojo in a bottle for us. Seems like a win win and he can at least give us better field position.


No the guy is 34 years old, he will do a little more than call for a fair catch, I just hope he doesn't drop the ball. Remember folks, he got cut for a reason.
obiken
Legacy
 
Posts: 3962
Joined: Sat Dec 14, 2013 4:50 pm
Location: Wilsonville, Oregon 97070

Re: Hester

Postby HumanCockroach » Wed Jan 04, 2017 12:27 am

http://www.pro-football-reference.com/p ... stDe99.htm

He didn't have some enormous drop in production, I am guessing Baltimore found a younger, cheaper alternative, can't say that I blame them, that said, Hester was still productive when they released him, so I'm not entirely sure that implying he can't play any longer is accurate.

For comparison..

http://www.pro-football-reference.com/p ... ckTy00.htm
User avatar
HumanCockroach
Legacy
 
Posts: 5133
Joined: Sat Dec 14, 2013 12:41 pm
Location: Woodinville, Wa

Re: Hester

Postby Uppercut » Wed Jan 04, 2017 7:30 am

He may be good at catching bubble screeens on third and long.
Uppercut
Legacy
 
Posts: 594
Joined: Sun Jan 12, 2014 6:23 pm

Re: Hester

Postby Hawktawk » Wed Jan 04, 2017 9:16 am

Hester has never gotten a ring in his hall of fame career. Now he has one more chance.
Motivation.
Hawktawk
Legacy
 
Posts: 8481
Joined: Tue Dec 17, 2013 10:57 am

Re: Hester

Postby Oly » Wed Jan 04, 2017 10:27 am

HumanCockroach wrote:http://www.pro-football-reference.com/players/H/HestDe99.htm

He didn't have some enormous drop in production, I am guessing Baltimore found a younger, cheaper alternative, can't say that I blame them, that said, Hester was still productive when they released him, so I'm not entirely sure that implying he can't play any longer is accurate.

For comparison..

http://www.pro-football-reference.com/p ... ckTy00.htm


It's the 5 fumbles that did him in. If he can hang on to the ball, he's solid. But given the fumbles and Pete's obsession about the ball, I'm a bit surprised he's the guy they brought in.
User avatar
Oly
Legacy
 
Posts: 901
Joined: Sat Dec 14, 2013 10:01 pm
Location: Middle of cornfields

Re: Hester

Postby c_hawkbob » Wed Jan 04, 2017 11:02 am

Oly wrote:
It's the 5 fumbles that did him in. If he can hang on to the ball, he's solid. But given the fumbles and Pete's obsession about the ball, I'm a bit surprised he's the guy they brought in.


5 fumbles doesn't constitute a particularly bad year for Devin. He's always been a high risk/high reward type of player.

Devin Hester years with 5 or more fumbles:

2006 - 8 (Pro Bowl)
2008 - 5
2011 - 5 (2nd team All Pro)
2013 - 5
2016 - 5

So it's not as though 5 fumbles all that unusual for him, nor that it meant he had a bad year.

I am actually a bit surprised that Pete picked him up with as much as he emphasizes ball security. I think it speaks to a) how much Pete wants a real threat on returns and b) how much we really don't want to expose Sherm unnecessarily.
User avatar
c_hawkbob
Legacy
 
Posts: 7513
Joined: Sat Dec 14, 2013 3:34 pm
Location: Paducah Kentucky, 42001

Re: Hester

Postby NorthHawk » Wed Jan 04, 2017 11:13 am

It might be that part of it is to give a spark to an inconsistent Offense.
Good field position also makes it easier on the Defense when the Offense sputters.
NorthHawk
Legacy
 
Posts: 11453
Joined: Sat Dec 14, 2013 11:57 am

Re: Hester

Postby Oly » Wed Jan 04, 2017 11:18 am

c_hawkbob wrote:5 fumbles doesn't constitute a particularly bad year for Devin. He's always been a high risk/high reward type of player.

Devin Hester years with 5 or more fumbles:

2006 - 8 (Pro Bowl)
2008 - 5
2011 - 5 (2nd team All Pro)
2013 - 5
2016 - 5

So it's not as though 5 fumbles all that unusual for him, nor that it meant he had a bad year.

I am actually a bit surprised that Pete picked him up with as much as he emphasizes ball security. I think it speaks to a) how much Pete wants a real threat on returns and b) how much we really don't want to expose Sherm unnecessarily.


The thing is that the returns aren't what they used to be, but the risk is still there. I mean, his stats aren't bad, it's just that if he's not producing huge returns and TDs, the fumbles hurt more.
User avatar
Oly
Legacy
 
Posts: 901
Joined: Sat Dec 14, 2013 10:01 pm
Location: Middle of cornfields

Re: Hester

Postby Hawktawk » Wed Jan 04, 2017 1:01 pm

Anyone watching Sherman dropping punts in pre game last week shouldn't worry about Hesters ball security.
Its the alamo, there's no back door.
In a perfect world Lockette the rocket is our return guy and Hester is retired. But it just isn't the reality and with all the other problems we cannot afford to have basically no threat to shorten the field in the return game.
In the postseason we cant be getting Richardson and Sherman etc gassed and maybe banged up on returns.

Its double trouble for Seattle because Lock handled all the returns, not just punts.


This is a guy who is microwave in terms of walking in the door ready to roll. Its a ballsy brilliant gamble.
At least if we are going down there wont be any bullets left in the chamber.
Hawktawk
Legacy
 
Posts: 8481
Joined: Tue Dec 17, 2013 10:57 am

Re: Hester

Postby I-5 » Wed Jan 04, 2017 1:59 pm

I think if he is able to successfully secure fair catches, and make a couple of decent long returns, it will have been a good decision.
User avatar
I-5
Legacy
 
Posts: 1770
Joined: Mon Dec 16, 2013 12:41 pm
Location: Seattle

Re: Hester

Postby Zorn76 » Thu Jan 05, 2017 12:28 am

Pleasantly surprised.
Hester still has some in the tank, and I agree that his pursuit of a ring will help him get whatever 2nd wind he needs.
User avatar
Zorn76
Legacy
 
Posts: 1894
Joined: Sat Dec 14, 2013 11:33 pm
Location: San Jose, CA

Re: Hester

Postby RiverDog » Thu Jan 05, 2017 5:36 am

jshawaii22 wrote:he was... a few year's ago anyway... but it gets Richard off the field and that's worth the signing.

js


Off topic a little, but why was Sherman and not Richardson returning punts last Sunday?
User avatar
RiverDog
Legacy
 
Posts: 23995
Joined: Sat Dec 14, 2013 10:52 am
Location: Kennewick, WA, 99338

Re: Hester

Postby HumanCockroach » Thu Jan 05, 2017 11:33 am

Probably because he's practiced returning punts for over two years solidly, Richardson hasn't.
User avatar
HumanCockroach
Legacy
 
Posts: 5133
Joined: Sat Dec 14, 2013 12:41 pm
Location: Woodinville, Wa

Re: Hester

Postby Seahawkfan80 » Fri Jan 06, 2017 4:28 pm

Hawktawk wrote:Anyone watching Sherman dropping punts in pre game last week shouldn't worry about Hesters ball security.
Its the alamo, there's no back door.
In a perfect world Lockette the rocket is our return guy and Hester is retired. But it just isn't the reality and with all the other problems we cannot afford to have basically no threat to shorten the field in the return game.
In the postseason we cant be getting Richardson and Sherman etc gassed and maybe banged up on returns.

Its double trouble for Seattle because Lock handled all the returns, not just punts.


This is a guy who is microwave in terms of walking in the door ready to roll. Its a ballsy brilliant gamble.
At least if we are going down there wont be any bullets left in the chamber.


Dangit....I always thought we were in the matrix.......Used to eat at the restaurant called Hooters too once in a while.
Seahawkfan80
Legacy
 
Posts: 34
Joined: Thu Mar 26, 2015 3:46 pm


Return to Seahawks Forum

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: HawkSis and 70 guests